Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueStadion Soglom AvlodData current as of September 19, 2026

Andijan vs Pakhtakor: match statistics

Andijan crest
Andijan
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Pakhtakor crest
Pakhtakor

Andijan vs Pakhtakor: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Andijan played against Pakhtakor in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on August 1, 2026. Venue: Stadion Soglom Avlod. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Andijan has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Pakhtakor has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Andijan scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 1.14. Pakhtakor scores 1.86 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.62 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 43% of Andijan's games and 64% of Pakhtakor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 50%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Pakhtakor has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.51 per game. Andijan takes 11.9 shots per game, while Pakhtakor takes 13.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Andijan leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 1.14 goals per game after halftime. Pakhtakor leads at halftime in 43% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Andijan's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Pakhtakor, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.62 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 6.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pakhtakor are the favorites: they sit 2nd in the table, with 10 wins, 3 draws and only 1 loss this season, and on the road they win 83% of matches with 0% defeats and 50% clean sheets. Andijan show strong offensive output at home — averaging 1.71 goals per game and xG 1.62, and in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 15 goals (3.0 per game), but conceded 7 goals in that period (1.4 per game). Despite the hosts' higher home xG (1.62 vs 1.44) Pakhtakor are more efficient and defensively stable: they concede only 0.67 goals on average away versus Andijan’s 0.86 and keep 50% clean sheets compared to the hosts’ 43%. Additionally, the visitors have 0% matches without scoring on the road (FTS 0%), while Andijan failed to score in 14% of their home games, which favors Pakhtakor’s attacking consistency. Considering table position, average points over the last 5 matches (2.0 vs 1.6) and the visitors’ defensive edge, I predict a Pakhtakor win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Andijan has a seasonal BTTS rate of 75% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Pakhtakor is at 50% seasonally and 40% in the last 5, with the league average at 56%, which favors the Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes) outcome. Andijan averages 2.0 goals per match (3.0 in the last 5) and records xG_for 1.65, while Pakhtakor scores 1.67 (1.4 in the last 5) with xG_for 1.44, so both sides are generating goal opportunities. Defensive comparison shows Andijan concedes 1.25 goals seasonally (xG_against 1.23), and Pakhtakor concedes 0.67 (xG_against 1.16), meaning Andijan has a strong chance to score against the weaker defense, and Pakhtakor has a realistic chance to score against Andijan (1.67 vs 1.25). The risk to BTTS comes from Pakhtakor keeping 50% clean sheets seasonally versus 13% for Andijan, so a no-goal scenario for one side is possible. Overall I assess BTTS probability at 65% (Yes) vs 35% (No) and recommend a 'yes' bet due to Andijan's strong scoring signals (75%/80%) and stable xG profiles for both teams.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I forecast a match with a clear likelihood of goals: xG is 1.65 for Andijan and 1.44 for Pakhtakor, and average goals scored are 2.0 (Andijan at home) and 1.67 (Pakhtakor away), yielding expected goals of 1.40 for the home side and 1.34 for the visitors (total 2.74). Andijan has averaged 3.0 goals in their last 5 matches and has 100% of home games this season over 1.5 goals, while Pakhtakor has 50% of games over 1.5 and 50% clean sheets away. Defensively Andijan concedes 1.25 goals at home on average, and Pakhtakor only 0.67 away, indicating the visitors can limit goals but do not exclude them (seasonal scoring rates: 75% for home team, 50% for away). From these data the safest bet is Over 1.5 (estimated probability ~76%); the 2.5 line has only a moderate edge (~52% for Over), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (~29%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time a lead for Andijan is more likely: the hosts led at the break in 4 home matches (50%) and score an average of 1.13 goals in the first half, while Pakhtakor averages 0.50 goals by half-time. After the break the advantage shifts to the visitors — Pakhtakor scored 5 goals in minutes 46–60 and averages 1.17 goals in the second half versus 0.88 for Andijan; points gained after the break are 14 for Pakhtakor vs 10 for the hosts (average points after the break 2.33 vs 1.25). Additionally Pakhtakor has better season-long results: 83% wins compared to 63% for Andijan and 0% away losses, which increases the visitors’ chance of overturning the deficit and winning. Considering the hosts’ half-time leads (50%) and the visitors’ second-half strength (higher average goals and points), the strongest signal is the 1/2 scenario — Andijan leading at half-time with Pakhtakor winning by full-time, which I assign a 30% probability. I distributed the remaining probabilities to reflect moderate chances of the lead holding (1/1 — 12%, 1/X — 8%), draw scenarios (X/X — 14%) or the visitors winning from a draw (X/2 — 20%) and low probabilities for situations where Pakhtakor leads at half-time (2/2 — 5%, 2/X — 1%, 2/1 — 0%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
AndijanPakhtakor
3Shots16
AndijanPakhtakor
1Shots on target3
AndijanPakhtakor
0.55xG1.56
AndijanPakhtakor
3Corners6
AndijanPakhtakor
39Dangerous attacks48
AndijanPakhtakor
14Fouls12
AndijanPakhtakor
7Cards2
AndijanPakhtakor

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.57Goals scored / game1.86
AndijanPakhtakor
1.14Goals allowed / game1
AndijanPakhtakor
49%Average possession59%
AndijanPakhtakor
4.43Shots on target / game4.71
AndijanPakhtakor

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.86Shots per game13.5
AndijanPakhtakor
4.43Shots on target4.71
AndijanPakhtakor
13.3%Shot conversion13.8%
AndijanPakhtakor
49%Possession59%
AndijanPakhtakor
1.51xG for1.56
AndijanPakhtakor
1.2xG against1.2
AndijanPakhtakor

Shooting quality

Andijan: Efficient finishingPakhtakor: Efficient finishing
AndijanPakhtakor
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Andijan is 11% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Andijan · 1.8 pts / game - Pakhtakor

Andijan
WWLDW
Season result split
43% W14% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-6
1.43 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Pakhtakor
DDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
71% W21% D7% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-3-1
2.36 pts / game · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pakhtakor is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.57 goals / game - Andijan · 1.86 goals / game - Pakhtakor

Pakhtakor is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.14 goals / game - Andijan · 1 goals / game - Pakhtakor

Andijan scoring profile: strong

Andijan scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 games), while Pakhtakor keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 games).

Pakhtakor scoring profile: very strong

Pakhtakor scores in 93% of games (13 of 14 games), while Andijan keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 games).

22Goals scored (season)26
AndijanPakhtakor
16Goals conceded (season)14
AndijanPakhtakor
2.71Average goals per game2.86
AndijanPakhtakor
11Goals scored (last 5)7
AndijanPakhtakor
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
AndijanPakhtakor

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal93%
AndijanPakhtakor
50%2 goals57%
AndijanPakhtakor
29%3 goals21%
AndijanPakhtakor
7%4 goals14%
AndijanPakhtakor

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal71%
AndijanPakhtakor
36%2 goals29%
AndijanPakhtakor
14%3 goals0%
AndijanPakhtakor
0%4 goals0%
AndijanPakhtakor

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time21%
AndijanPakhtakor
0%BTTS in both halves7%
AndijanPakhtakor
29%Scored in both halves36%
AndijanPakhtakor

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
AndijanPakhtakor
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AndijanPakhtakor
60%BTTS - last 580%
AndijanPakhtakor

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
AndijanPakhtakor
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
AndijanPakhtakor
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
AndijanPakhtakor

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
AndijanPakhtakor
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
AndijanPakhtakor
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
AndijanPakhtakor

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pakhtakor is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / game - Andijan · 1.79 pts / game - Pakhtakor

Andijan - half-time state
29% leading43% draw29% trailing
Pakhtakor - half-time state
43% leading50% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per game (1st half)1.79
AndijanPakhtakor
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.86
AndijanPakhtakor
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
AndijanPakhtakor
0.79Average goals (1st half)1.21
AndijanPakhtakor
71%Clean sheet before half-time71%
AndijanPakhtakor
71%No goal before half-time36%
AndijanPakhtakor

After half-time (2nd half)

1.86Points per game (2nd half)1.71
AndijanPakhtakor
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)1
AndijanPakhtakor
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
AndijanPakhtakor
1.93Average goals (2nd half)1.64
AndijanPakhtakor
43%Clean sheet after half-time50%
AndijanPakhtakor
29%No goal after half-time36%
AndijanPakhtakor

Andijan - second-half results

57% W14% D29% L
18
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Pakhtakor - second-half results

50% W21% D29% L
25
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 71%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Andijan - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.40
Goals scored / game0.41.8
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game0.62.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Pakhtakor - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Andijan
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
4
31-45
2
4
46-60
5
1
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Pakhtakor
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
1
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+133%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Andijan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

Pakhtakor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

AndijanLigaPakhtakor
Average goals per game 2.712.62 2.86
Both teams scored 43%56% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%52% 50%
Clean sheets 36%25% 29%
Goal before half-time 57%68% 71%
Goal after half-time 93%79% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / game
1.25
Away goals / game
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AndijanYellow cardAzizbek Turgunbayev
  2. AndijanYellow cardOdilbek Abdumajidov
  3. AndijanSubstitutionOn: Martin BoakyeOff: Khumoyunmirzo Iminov
  4. AndijanSubstitutionOn: Hamidullo KarimovOff: Azizbek Turgunbayev
  5. AndijanRed cardNemanja Ćalasan
  6. AndijanYellow cardBekzod Sulaymonov
  7. AndijanRed cardMartin Boakye

Head-to-head

Record from Andijan's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Pakhtakor. Games average 6.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FK Andijan
2 : 6
FK Pakhtakor Tashkent
FK Pakhtakor Tashkent
2 : 3
FK Andijan

FAQ

What was the result of Andijan vs Pakhtakor?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Andijan 0:0 Pakhtakor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Andijan and Pakhtakor?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Andijan won 1, Pakhtakor won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 6.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Andijan vs Pakhtakor?

Andijan score 1.57 goals per game on average and Pakhtakor 1.86. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Andijan's matches and 64% of Pakhtakor's.

What form are Andijan and Pakhtakor in?

Over the last 5 games Andijan have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Pakhtakor 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Andijan vs Pakhtakor?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.