South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics

Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land

Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ansan Greeners play Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 07:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Ansan Greeners: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Seoul E-Land: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ansan Greeners scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Seoul E-Land scores 1.76 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ansan Greeners 65%, Seoul E-Land 65%. Over 2.5: Ansan Greeners 65%, Seoul E-Land 76%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.18. Ansan Greeners: 8.9 shots per match, Seoul E-Land: 13.3.

Match halves

Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.53. Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.12.

Goals by minute

Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (4 goals). Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-2-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 67%.

Match description

Seoul E-Land are clear favorites for this fixture: they sit 3rd in the table with a season record of 4 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, while Ansan Greeners are 11th with 2 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses. Offensive and defensive differentials are significant — the away side score 1.75 goals per away match and concede 1.00, whereas the home team score 1.00 at home and concede 2.25; average xG are 1.38 for Seoul versus 1.18 for Ansan, and xG against 1.63 vs 2.06. Seoul create more chances (on average 11.75 shots and 5.0 on target per away game) with a conversion rate of 15%, while Ansan register 8.75 shots and 3.75 on target with an 11% conversion, translating to 11 goals for Seoul in the last 5 matches versus 5 for Ansan and 3 away wins in that period compared to 1 home win. Ansan’s home issues are pronounced: no home wins yet (0% home wins), 75% of home matches lost, 0% clean sheets and a negative home goal difference of -5, indicating defensive fragility and a higher likelihood of opponent goals. Considering superior chance volume, higher efficiency and an average of 2 points in Seoul’s last 5 matches versus 1 point for Ansan, I forecast an away win at 65% probability, 20% for a draw and 15% for the home side.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
6Shots12
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0Shots on target5
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0.57xG1.46
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1Corners2
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
26Dangerous attacks49
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
7Fouls14
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1Cards4
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1Goals scored / match1.76
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
2Goals conceded / match1.24
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
46%Average possession50%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
3.82Shots on target / match5.41
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.94Shots per match13.29
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
3.82Shots on target5.41
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
11.2%Shot conversion13.3%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
46%Possession50%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1.18xG for1.61
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
2.07xG against1.24
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

Shooting quality

Ansan Greeners: BalancedSeoul E-Land: Efficient finishing
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
Accuracy (shots on target)43%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seoul E-Land is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Ansan Greeners
LLLWL
Season result split
24% W12% R65% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-11
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-8
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 2.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Seoul E-Land
WWLWD
Season result split
53% W18% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-5
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.86Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 76% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.76 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Seoul E-Land is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.24 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Ansan Greeners scoring profile: strong

Ansan Greeners scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

17Goals scored (season)30
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
34Goals conceded (season)21
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
3Average goals in match3
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
4Goals scored (last 5)10
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
15Goals conceded (last 5)6
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal88%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
18%2 goals59%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
6%3 goals29%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
6%4 goals0%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal71%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
59%2 goals41%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
35%3 goals12%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
6%4 goals0%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time24%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0%Scored in both halves35%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
60%BTTS - last 580%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seoul E-Land is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.94 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.47 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Ansan Greeners - half-time state
18% leading41% draw41% trailing
Seoul E-Land - half-time state
35% leading41% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.94Points per match (1st half)1.47
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0.82Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.12
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
35%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
53%No goal before half-time47%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

After half-time (2nd half)

0.82Points per match (2nd half)1.82
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)1.12
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1.18Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.88
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
47%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
76%No goal after half-time29%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

18% W29% R53% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

53% W24% R24% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding151%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ansan Greeners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Seoul E-Land - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
2
6
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
5
4
61-75
10
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.89
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Ansan GreenersLigaSeoul E-Land
Average goals in match 3.002.75 3.00
Both teams scored 65%61% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%56% 76%
Clean sheets 6%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 82%73% 76%
Goal after half-time 71%76% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Ansan Greeners 0 - 2 - 1 Seoul E-Land. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Seoul E-Land FC
6 : 0
Ansan Greeners FC
Ansan Greeners FC
2 : 2
Seoul E-Land FC
Seoul E-Land FC
1 : 1
Ansan Greeners FC

FAQ

What was the result of Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land?

The K League 2 match finished Ansan Greeners 0:2 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ansan Greeners and Seoul E-Land?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ansan Greeners won 0, Seoul E-Land won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land?

Ansan Greeners score 1.00 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.76. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Ansan Greeners's matches and 65% of Seoul E-Land's.

What form are Ansan Greeners and Seoul E-Land in?

Over the last 5 games Ansan Greeners have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.