Ansan Greeners vs Suwon: match statistics
Ansan Greeners vs Suwon: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ansan Greeners played against Suwon in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on July 4, 2026. Venue: Ansan Wa~ Stadium. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
Ansan Greeners has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Suwon has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Ansan Greeners scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.79. Suwon scores 1.86 and allows 1.43. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of Ansan Greeners's games and 86% of Suwon's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 79%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Suwon has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.26 per game. Ansan Greeners takes 9.7 shots per game, while Suwon takes 11.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Ansan Greeners leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Suwon leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ansan Greeners's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Suwon, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ansan Greeners sit 15th in the table with only 3 wins this season and 14 goals scored vs 25 conceded, while Suwon are 7th with 26 scored and 20 conceded, giving a clear advantage to the visitors. Ansan have lost 5 of their last 5 matches (0 wins); in those five fixtures they scored 2 and conceded 11, an average of 0.4 scored and 2.2 conceded per game. Suwon in their last 5 matches scored 8 goals and average 1.2 points per game in that period; away they register 1.88 goals per game and on average 4.25 shots on target, versus 0.89 goals and 3.78 shots on target for the hosts, with a shot conversion rate of 17% vs 9%. In terms of quality of chances Ansan have average home xG per game of 1.30 against xG against 1.74 (difference -0.44), while Suwon have away xG per game of 1.39 and xG against 1.22 (difference +0.17), indicating better chance creation by the visitors. Considering Ansan’s 78% home loss rate, no wins in their last 5, and Suwon’s superiority in goals (26 vs 14) and efficiency, I forecast a win for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are very high: Ansan 83% and Suwon 88%, while the league average is 63%, strongly favoring a both-teams-to-score scenario. In the last 5 matches there is a divergence — Ansan has only 40% BTTS and averages 0.4 goals scored with 2.2 conceded per game, whereas Suwon has 80% BTTS and records 1.6 scored and 1.4 conceded, so the visitors are in better offensive form. xG confirms both teams create chances: Ansan offensive xG is 1.43 versus Suwon 1.39, and xG against is 1.58 (Ansan) versus 1.22 (Suwon), suggesting potential for goals from both sides. Additionally, Suwon has 0% clean sheets this season and Ansan 17%, while 67% of home matches and 88% of away matches finish over 2.5 goals, which reduces the probability of a goalless game. Summing seasonal 83%/88%, the visitors’ lack of clean sheets and favorable xG, I rate BTTS as more likely and give it 80% (Yes) versus 20% (No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonal goal averages are 1.83 for Ansan and 1.88 for Suwon (total 3.71), while calculated xG gives 1.33 for Ansan and 1.49 for Suwon, totalling 2.82 expected goals. This season Ansan had 83% of matches with at least 2 goals and Suwon 100%; additionally the percentage of matches with both teams scoring is 83% for Ansan and 88% for Suwon — a strong signal for Over 1.5 (I rate this at 92%). For the 2.5 line note that 67% of Ansan’s matches and 88% of Suwon’s matches finished Over 2.5 goals, and our expected 2.82 goals exceeds the 2.5 threshold, so I assign 74% probability to Over 2.5. The 3.5 line is less convincing: seasonal Over 3.5 rates are 50%/50% and xG 2.82 remains below 3.5, so I rate Over 3.5 at 40% (Under 60%). Considering the last 5 matches as well (Ansan scored 2 goals in their last 5 matches, i.e. 0.4 average, and Suwon 8 goals i.e. 1.6) and Ansan’s defensive weakness (11 goals conceded in the last 5 matches, average 2.2), the best pick is Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Scenario 1/1 is supported by seasonal statistics: the home side led at the break in 4 of their matches so far (67%) and score on average 1.0 goals before half-time, while Suwon averages 0.75 goals by the break. Additionally, Ansan has a higher season-long points efficiency: 2.0 points per game versus 1.38 for the visitors, a higher win rate of 50% vs 38%, and a slightly better xG of 1.43 compared to 1.39, indicating an advantage in chance creation. Countering this is the hosts’ poor recent form over the last five matches — 0 wins and 5 losses (five straight defeats) and an average of 2.2 goals conceded in that period, which increases the risk of surrendering a lead. Considering the strong seasonal signals favoring the home side at half-time and the xG advantage, while also accounting for the poor form, I assigned the highest probability of 28% to the 1/1 scenario; realistic alternatives are the visitors leading and winning 2/2 (15%) and draw at half-time and draw at full-time X/X (14%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ansan Greeners | Suwon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Suwon is 86% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Ansan Greeners · 1.86 goals / game - Suwon
Suwon is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.79 goals / game - Ansan Greeners · 1.43 goals / game - Suwon
Ansan Greeners scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while Suwon keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 meczów).
Suwon scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 meczów), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ansan Greeners
Over / Under - Suwon
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Suwon is 76% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / game - Ansan Greeners · 1.64 pts / game - Suwon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ansan Greeners - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Suwon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 43%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ansan Greeners
Suwon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Ansan Greeners | Liga | Suwon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.79 | 2.74 | ▲ 3.29 |
| Both teams scored | • 64% | 63% | ▲ 86% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 57% | 57% | ▲ 79% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 23% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 73% | ▲ 93% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 76% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Ansan Greeners vs Suwon?
The K League 2 match finished Ansan Greeners 1:3 Suwon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ansan Greeners vs Suwon?
Ansan Greeners score 1.00 goals per game on average and Suwon 1.86. The K League 2 average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Ansan Greeners's matches and 86% of Suwon's.
What form are Ansan Greeners and Suwon in?
Over the last 5 games Ansan Greeners have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Suwon 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ansan Greeners vs Suwon?
The statistical background for Ansan Greeners vs Suwon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


