Anyang vs Gwangju: match statistics
Anyang vs Gwangju: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Anyang played against Gwangju in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on July 19, 2026. Venue: Anyang Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Anyang has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Gwangju has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Anyang scores 1.29 goals per game and allows 1.12. Gwangju scores 0.47 and allows 2.41. Games in this league average 2.27 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 71% of Anyang's games and 29% of Gwangju's. The Over 2.5 rates are 35% and 53%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Anyang has the higher season xG average, 1.23 to 1.03 per game. Anyang takes 9.4 shots per game, while Gwangju takes 8.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Anyang leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Gwangju leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.35 after halftime.
When the teams score
Anyang's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Gwangju, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.27 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an Anyang win (1): the hosts average 1.13 goals per home match, while Gwangju manage only 0.25 goals on the road. Defensively the visitors are weak — Gwangju concede 2.88 goals per away match and have 41 goals conceded this season, whereas Anyang concede 1.38 at home and only 19 in total. Chance creation and efficiency favor Anyang: hosts average 9.13 shots and 3.0 on target per game with a 12% conversion, versus Gwangju’s 7.5 shots, 1.88 on target and just 3% conversion; the visitors fail to score in 75% of away matches. In the last 5 matches Anyang scored 8 goals and average 1.6 points per game, while Gwangju have 1 goal and 0.4 points; combined with the xG differential (1.15 vs 0.94 in favor of Anyang and xG against 1.43 vs 1.71) this confirms the home-side advantage.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict No BTTS. Gwangju essentially do not score — seasonal goals average 0.25 and only 1 goal in the last 5 matches (0.2), with a shot conversion rate of just 3%, which sharply limits the away side’s chances of finding the net. Anyang have a clearly superior offense: seasonal average 0.67, 22 goals this season and 8 goals in the last 5 matches (1.6 avg), xG for 1.1 (last 5: 1.19) and an average of 2.67 shots on target, so the hosts are likely to score. Both teams are however vulnerable defensively — Gwangju concede 2.88 goals per match, Anyang 2.0, and xG against in the last 5 matches is 2.04 (Gwangju) and 2.07 (Anyang), which increases the risk of goals but does not guarantee BTTS due to Gwangju’s poor efficiency. Additionally, seasonal BTTS rates are low (33% Anyang, 25% Gwangju, league 48%), and away matches for Gwangju show 50% of games as over 2.5 goals without BTTS, therefore I assess No BTTS as more likely (approx. 70%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
On the season Anyang averages 0.67 goals per game and Gwangju 0.25, but in the last 5 matches Anyang scored 8 goals (1.6 avg) while Gwangju only 1 goal (0.2), indicating an improvement in the home side’s attack. xG for Anyang is 1.10 and for Gwangju 0.94, with xG against 1.96 (Anyang) and 1.71 (Gwangju), yielding expected goals of ~1.40 for Anyang and ~1.45 for Gwangju (total 2.85). Both teams have relatively high percentages of matches over 1.5 goals: 56% (Anyang) and 75% (Gwangju), and over 2.5 at 44%/63%, which translates into clear support for overs, particularly Over 1.5. Additionally, the hosts average 8.44 shots with an 8% conversion rate versus the visitors’ 7.5 shots and 3% conversion, and both sides concede many goals on the season (2.0 and 2.88), increasing the likelihood of further scoring. Based on this, the strongest and most probable signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time it is most likely to be a draw: the average goals by half-time are only 0.11 for Anyang and 0.13 for Gwangju, and the home side are level at the break in 67% of matches, indicating a high probability of a draw after 45 minutes. However, in the last 5 matches Anyang led at half-time in 60% (3 of 5) and record 0.8 goals by half-time versus 0.0 for Gwangju, so in the most recent form the hosts are more active early. After the break the case for Anyang is stronger: the hosts’ xG is 1.10 vs 0.94 for the visitors, more shots on target (2.67 vs 1.88) and higher shot conversion (8% vs 3%), and the average second-half goals are 0.56 for the hosts versus 0.13 for the visitors. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Anyang have won 40% of games while Gwangju have won 0%, and seasonally the visitors concede an average of 2.88 goals vs 2.00 for the hosts, so the best HT/FT pick appears to be draw at half-time and home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Anyang | Gwangju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Anyang is 300% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Anyang · 0.4 pts / game - Gwangju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Anyang is 174% better for: goals scored per game.
1.29 goals / game - Anyang · 0.47 goals / game - Gwangju
Anyang is 115% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.12 goals / game - Anyang · 2.41 goals / game - Gwangju
Anyang scores in 82% of games (14 of 17 meczów), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 meczów).
Gwangju scores in 29% of games (5 of 17 meczów), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Anyang
Over / Under - Gwangju
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Anyang is 226% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.53 pts / game - Anyang · 0.47 pts / game - Gwangju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Anyang - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Gwangju - second-half results
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Anyang
Gwangju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Anyang | Liga | Gwangju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.41 | 2.27 | ▲ 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 48% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 39% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 31% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 62% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 74% | ▲ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Anyang's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses against Gwangju. Games average 2.80 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Anyang vs Gwangju?
The K League 1 match finished Anyang 1:1 Gwangju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Anyang and Gwangju?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Anyang won 1, Gwangju won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Anyang vs Gwangju?
Anyang score 1.29 goals per game on average and Gwangju 0.47. The K League 1 average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Anyang's matches and 29% of Gwangju's.
What form are Anyang and Gwangju in?
Over the last 5 games Anyang have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Gwangju 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Anyang vs Gwangju?
The statistical background for Anyang vs Gwangju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


