Anyang vs Incheon United: match statistics
Anyang vs Incheon United: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Anyang played against Incheon United in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on August 26, 2026. Venue: Anyang Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Anyang has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Incheon United has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Anyang scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.54. Incheon United scores 1.30 and allows 1.09. Games in this league average 2.39 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 71% of Anyang's games and 52% of Incheon United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 48%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Incheon United has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.28 per game. Anyang takes 10.1 shots per game, while Incheon United takes 11.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Anyang leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Incheon United leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.61 after halftime.
When the teams score
Anyang's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Incheon United, it is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.39 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Incheon United have clearly superior away numbers: they average 1.60 goals per match compared with Anyang’s 1.18 at home, while conceding just 1.20 goals versus the hosts’ 1.36. The visitors also create more high-quality chances, recording an xG of 1.49 and 4.40 shots on target per game, compared with Anyang’s 1.26 and 3.36, respectively. Anyang have failed to keep a clean sheet in any home match, while their defense allows opponents an average xG of 1.64, which should benefit Incheon’s attacking efficiency. The teams’ recent five-match form is similar in terms of points, with both averaging 1.2 points per game, but Incheon have lost just once and drawn three times, whereas Anyang have suffered 3 defeats. The hosts’ high home draw rate of 45% increases the likelihood of a closely contested match, but the visitors’ edge in chance creation and defensive stability points to a narrow Incheon victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The case for both teams to score is strengthened primarily by their current form: in their last 5 matches, both Anyang and Incheon recorded BTTS in 80% of games. Anyang averaged 1.4 goals scored during this period but conceded as many as 1.8, while Incheon scored and conceded 1.4 goals per match. Their attacking potential is also reflected in their xG figures from the last five outings: 1.51 for the hosts and a very strong 1.76 for the visitors, with Anyang’s xG against standing at 1.59. Over the course of the season, Incheon have recorded BTTS in 60% of matches compared with 50% for Anyang, while both teams rarely keep a clean sheet, doing so in 30% and 25% of games respectively. Although Anyang have failed to score in 25% of their league matches this season, the current number of chances and the hosts’ weaker defensive setup make the BTTS - Yes scenario more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The projection of 2.65 goals is based on fairly similar chance-quality metrics: Anyang creates an average of 1.50 xG, while Incheon averages 1.49 xG per match. At the same time, the hosts score only 1.08 goals per game this season, while their opponents keep a clean sheet in 30% of matches, limiting the potential for a very high-scoring game. The 3.5 line went under in 83% of Anyang’s matches and 70% of Incheon’s, clearly more often than would be expected in a scenario involving four or more goals. The hosts’ last five matches have been more open, with 80% finishing Over 2.5 goals, but Incheon went over this line in only 40% of such games. Therefore, the most consistent edge lies with Under 3.5: the data supports two or three goals but does not provide strong enough evidence for at least four.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and at full-time, as Incheon were level at the break in 70% of their matches, with that figure rising to 75% across their last five games. Anyang score only 0.50 goals per match before the break and failed to score in the first half in 67% of their games, while Incheon concede an average of just 0.50 goals during this period. At full-time, the visitors have drawn as many as 40% of their matches this season and 60% of their last five, limiting the advantage suggested by their superior average of 1.60 goals scored compared with Anyang’s 1.08. The two sides are closely matched in chance quality, with average xG of 1.50 for the hosts and 1.49 for the visitors, while both defenses allow approximately 1.3 xG. This points to a balanced, cautious match in which the first half particularly favors a draw, with neither team having clear grounds to pull away after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Anyang | Incheon United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Incheon United is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Anyang · 1.8 pts / game - Incheon United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Incheon United is 41% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.54 goals / game - Anyang · 1.09 goals / game - Incheon United
Anyang scores in 79% of games (19 of 24 meczów), while Incheon United keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 meczów).
Incheon United scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 meczów), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Anyang
Over / Under - Incheon United
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Anyang - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Incheon United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Anyang
Incheon United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Anyang | Liga | Incheon United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.79 | 2.39 | • 2.39 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 50% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 46% | 42% | ▲ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 31% | • 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 62% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 75% | ▲ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Anyang's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Incheon United. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Anyang vs Incheon United?
The K League 1 match finished Anyang 2:1 Incheon United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Anyang and Incheon United?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Anyang won 1, Incheon United won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Anyang vs Incheon United?
Anyang score 1.25 goals per game on average and Incheon United 1.30. The K League 1 average is 2.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Anyang's matches and 52% of Incheon United's.
What form are Anyang and Incheon United in?
Over the last 5 games Anyang have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Incheon United 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Anyang vs Incheon United?
The statistical background for Anyang vs Incheon United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


