Anyang vs Ulsan: match statistics
Anyang vs Ulsan: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Anyang played against Ulsan in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on September 19, 2026. Venue: Anyang Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Anyang has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Ulsan has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Anyang scores 1.24 goals per game and allows 1.59. Ulsan scores 1.52 and allows 1.31. Games in this league average 2.45 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 72% of Anyang's games and 66% of Ulsan's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 59%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ulsan has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 1.25 per game. Anyang takes 9.8 shots per game, while Ulsan takes 13.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Anyang leads at halftime in 24% of its games and scores 0.69 goals per game after halftime. Ulsan leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.97 after halftime.
When the teams score
Anyang's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Ulsan, it is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.45 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ulsan sit 2nd in the table, while Anyang are ninth, and the overall season record stands at 14 wins for the visitors compared with 8 home wins. Current form also favors Ulsan: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and conceded just 4 goals in that run, whereas Anyang have averaged 1 point per game, suffering 2 defeats and conceding 9 goals. Away from home, Ulsan score an average of 1.29 goals, create chances worth 1.50 xG and register 4.43 shots on target per match, compared with Anyang’s 1.07 goals, 1.18 xG and 2.86 shots on target at home. The hosts’ defense is a clear concern, conceding 1.86 goals per home match and keeping no clean sheets, while Ulsan concede an average of 1.07 goals away from home. A draw remains a realistic possibility given Anyang’s 36% home draw rate, but the visitors’ superiority in chance quality, defensive efficiency and current form points to a Ulsan win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes pick is supported by the seasonal metrics of both teams: Anyang have recorded goals from both sides in 73% of their matches, while Ulsan have done so in 57%, compared with the league average of 53%. The hosts score an average of 1.73 goals but concede 1.53, whereas Ulsan score 1.29 goals per match and concede 1.07. In their last five matches, Anyang had BTTS in 80% of cases and conceded as many as 1.8 goals per game, significantly increasing Ulsan’s chances of scoring. However, Ulsan have kept a clean sheet in 21% of their matches and conceded only 0.8 goals over their last five fixtures, meaning the risk of an Anyang No Goal scenario remains significant. Nevertheless, the hosts’ high xG of 1.81 and the 1.96 xG recently allowed by Ulsan support the Goal/Goal outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal points to at least two goals: Anyang matches went over the 1.5 line in 73% of cases, while Ulsan reached it in as many as 86%. Both teams very rarely finish matches without scoring, as a goal was scored in 93% of their games. Anyang generate an average of 1.81 xG, compared with 1.50 xG for Ulsan, while both defenses allow opponents 1.69 and 1.63 xG respectively. The last five matches also support a goals-based selection: Over 2.5 occurred in 60% of matches for both teams, although Ulsan's improved recent defensive record, conceding 0.8 goals per game, reduces confidence in higher lines. The 2.72-goal projection indicates that Over 1.5 has a clear advantage over the more demanding Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Ulsan win at full-time, as the visitors were level at the break in all of their last five matches, while Anyang recorded this outcome in 60% of that sample. Ulsan’s first halves have been very tight: across their last five matches, they averaged just 0.2 goals scored and conceded, which strongly supports an undecided scoreline before the break. After half-time, the form advantage shifts to the visitors, who averaged 1.2 goals scored in the second half of their last five appearances, while Anyang conceded as many as 1.2 goals during that period. Ulsan won 60% of their last five matches and conceded an average of 0.8 goals per game, compared with Anyang’s 20% win rate and 1.8 goals conceded. The hosts have a slightly higher seasonal xG, 1.81 compared with 1.50, but their weaker current form and Ulsan’s more solid defense point towards a visitors’ victory after the break. The recommended HT/FT selection is X/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Anyang | Ulsan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ulsan is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Anyang · 2 pts / game - Ulsan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ulsan is 23% better for: goals scored per game.
1.24 goals / game - Anyang · 1.52 goals / game - Ulsan
Ulsan is 21% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.59 goals / game - Anyang · 1.31 goals / game - Ulsan
Anyang scores in 79% of games (23 of 29 games), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 games).
Ulsan scores in 79% of games (23 of 29 games), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 29 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Anyang
Over / Under - Ulsan
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Anyang is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / game - Anyang · 1.21 pts / game - Ulsan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Anyang - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ulsan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Anyang
Ulsan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Anyang | Liga | Ulsan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.83 | 2.45 | ▲ 2.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 72% | 52% | ▲ 66% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 45% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 30% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 62% | 60% | ▲ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 77% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Anyang's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses against Ulsan. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Anyang vs Ulsan?
The K League 1 match finished Anyang 2:1 Ulsan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Anyang and Ulsan?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Anyang won 2, Ulsan won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Anyang vs Ulsan?
Anyang score 1.24 goals per game on average and Ulsan 1.52. The K League 1 average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Anyang's matches and 66% of Ulsan's.
What form are Anyang and Ulsan in?
Over the last 5 games Anyang have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ulsan 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Anyang vs Ulsan?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Anyang vs Ulsan: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.