APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion: match statistics
The match shapes up to be a tightly contested clash between two bottom-table sides struggling for form. APEA holds a poor home record with just a 14% win rate and a -6 goal difference, conceding an average of 2 goals per game. Ethnikos Latsion performs equally poorly on the road (29% win rate, -5 GD), yet boasts a superior shot conversion rate (10% vs 4%) and generates more shots on target (4.67 vs 3.8). Both teams share an identical clean sheet percentage (29%) and similar defensive frailties, suggesting goals are likely. Recent form over the last 5 matches is dismal for both squads (APEA: 1 point/match, Ethnikos: 0.4 points/match), pointing towards a draw as the safest scenario. The hosts' slight edge derives solely from home advantage, as their underlying statistics offer no guarantee of victory.
APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
APEA played against Ethnikos Latsion in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on January 3, 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
APEA has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Ethnikos Latsion has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
APEA scores 1.23 goals per game and allows 1.62. Ethnikos Latsion scores 0.85 and allows 1.77. Games in this league average 2.50 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 54% of APEA's games and 46% of Ethnikos Latsion's. The Over 2.5 rates are 69% and 31%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
APEA has the higher season xG average, 1.40 to 1.15 per game. APEA takes 8.4 shots per game, while Ethnikos Latsion takes 8.1.
First-half and second-half trends
APEA leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.69 goals per game after halftime. Ethnikos Latsion leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.38 after halftime.
When the teams score
APEA's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Ethnikos Latsion, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.50 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The match shapes up to be a tightly contested clash between two bottom-table sides struggling for form. APEA holds a poor home record with just a 14% win rate and a -6 goal difference, conceding an average of 2 goals per game. Ethnikos Latsion performs equally poorly on the road (29% win rate, -5 GD), yet boasts a superior shot conversion rate (10% vs 4%) and generates more shots on target (4.67 vs 3.8). Both teams share an identical clean sheet percentage (29%) and similar defensive frailties, suggesting goals are likely. Recent form over the last 5 matches is dismal for both squads (APEA: 1 point/match, Ethnikos: 0.4 points/match), pointing towards a draw as the safest scenario. The hosts' slight edge derives solely from home advantage, as their underlying statistics offer no guarantee of victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| APEA | Ethnikos Latsion | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
APEA is 150% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - APEA · 0.4 pts / game - Ethnikos Latsion
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
APEA is 45% better for: goals scored per game.
1.23 goals / game - APEA · 0.85 goals / game - Ethnikos Latsion
APEA is 9% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.62 goals / game - APEA · 1.77 goals / game - Ethnikos Latsion
APEA scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while Ethnikos Latsion keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 meczów).
Ethnikos Latsion scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while APEA keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - APEA
Over / Under - Ethnikos Latsion
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
APEA is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / game - APEA · 0.85 pts / game - Ethnikos Latsion
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
APEA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Ethnikos Latsion - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
APEA
Ethnikos Latsion
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| APEA | Liga | Ethnikos Latsion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.85 | 2.50 | ▲ 2.62 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 48% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 46% | ▼ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 31% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 65% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | • 77% | 78% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion?
The Second Division match finished APEA 3:0 Ethnikos Latsion. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion?
APEA score 1.23 goals per game on average and Ethnikos Latsion 0.85. The Second Division average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 54% of APEA's matches and 46% of Ethnikos Latsion's.
What form are APEA and Ethnikos Latsion in?
Over the last 5 games APEA have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ethnikos Latsion 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion?
The statistical background for APEA vs Ethnikos Latsion — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.