APEA vs Iraklis Yerolakkou: match statistics
APEA shows poor home form with just 27% of matches won at home and a 1-1-3 record in their last five matches overall. Iraklis Yerolakkou, on the other hand, is in significantly better form, being undefeated in their last five matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and averaging 1.8 points per game. The visitors play very defensively away from home, as evidenced by 50% draws and an average of only 1 goal conceded per away match. APEA scores an average of 1.45 goals at home, but their xG (1.49) suggests efficiency at the expected level, while the visitors struggle to score away (60% of matches without a goal). Considering Iraklis's defensive style and their current unbeaten streak, along with APEA's problems winning at home, the most likely scenario seems to be a draw, although the hosts have a slight advantage due to the home factor.
APEA vs Iraklis Yerolakkou: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
APEA played against Iraklis Yerolakkou in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on February 21, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
APEA has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Iraklis Yerolakkou has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
APEA scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.55. Iraklis Yerolakkou scores 0.85 and allows 1.15. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of APEA's games and 60% of Iraklis Yerolakkou's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 30%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
APEA has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.25 per game. APEA takes 8.3 shots per game, while Iraklis Yerolakkou takes 6.0.
First-half and second-half trends
APEA leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Iraklis Yerolakkou leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.35 after halftime.
When the teams score
APEA's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Iraklis Yerolakkou, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
APEA shows poor home form with just 27% of matches won at home and a 1-1-3 record in their last five matches overall. Iraklis Yerolakkou, on the other hand, is in significantly better form, being undefeated in their last five matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and averaging 1.8 points per game. The visitors play very defensively away from home, as evidenced by 50% draws and an average of only 1 goal conceded per away match. APEA scores an average of 1.45 goals at home, but their xG (1.49) suggests efficiency at the expected level, while the visitors struggle to score away (60% of matches without a goal). Considering Iraklis's defensive style and their current unbeaten streak, along with APEA's problems winning at home, the most likely scenario seems to be a draw, although the hosts have a slight advantage due to the home factor.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| APEA | Iraklis Yerolakkou | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.21 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Iraklis Yerolakkou is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - APEA · 1.8 pts / game - Iraklis Yerolakkou
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
APEA is 47% better for: goals scored per game.
1.25 goals / game - APEA · 0.85 goals / game - Iraklis Yerolakkou
Iraklis Yerolakkou is 35% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.55 goals / game - APEA · 1.15 goals / game - Iraklis Yerolakkou
APEA scores in 65% of games (13 of 20 meczów), while Iraklis Yerolakkou keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 meczów).
Iraklis Yerolakkou scores in 65% of games (13 of 20 meczów), while APEA keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - APEA
Over / Under - Iraklis Yerolakkou
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Iraklis Yerolakkou is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.95 pts / game - APEA · 1.15 pts / game - Iraklis Yerolakkou
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
APEA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Iraklis Yerolakkou - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
APEA
Iraklis Yerolakkou
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| APEA | Liga | Iraklis Yerolakkou | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.80 | 2.65 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 49% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 46% | ▼ 30% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 29% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 90% | 74% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 78% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from APEA's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Iraklis Yerolakkou. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of APEA vs Iraklis Yerolakkou?
The Second Division match finished APEA 0:1 Iraklis Yerolakkou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before APEA vs Iraklis Yerolakkou?
APEA score 1.25 goals per game on average and Iraklis Yerolakkou 0.85. The Second Division average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 50% of APEA's matches and 60% of Iraklis Yerolakkou's.
What form are APEA and Iraklis Yerolakkou in?
Over the last 5 games APEA have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Iraklis Yerolakkou 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for APEA vs Iraklis Yerolakkou?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for APEA vs Iraklis Yerolakkou: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.