APS Bomet vs Tusker: match statistics
APS Bomet vs Tusker: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
APS Bomet played against Tusker in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The game was played on December 21, 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
APS Bomet has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Tusker has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
APS Bomet scores 1.07 goals per game and allows 1.29. Tusker scores 0.86 and allows 0.79. Games in this league average 1.89 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of APS Bomet's games and 36% of Tusker's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 21%, compared with league averages of 39% for BTTS and 30% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tusker has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.12 per game. APS Bomet takes 6.0 shots per game, while Tusker takes 12.6.
First-half and second-half trends
APS Bomet leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.21 goals per game after halftime. Tusker leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.36 after halftime.
When the teams score
APS Bomet's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (11 goals). For Tusker, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Kenyan Premier League games average 1.89 goals. Both teams score in 39% of games, and 30% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| APS Bomet | Tusker | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tusker is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - APS Bomet · 1.8 pts / game - Tusker
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
APS Bomet is 24% better for: goals scored per game.
1.07 goals / game - APS Bomet · 0.86 goals / game - Tusker
Tusker is 63% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.29 goals / game - APS Bomet · 0.79 goals / game - Tusker
APS Bomet scores in 57% of games (8 of 14 meczów), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 meczów).
Tusker scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while APS Bomet keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - APS Bomet
Over / Under - Tusker
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tusker is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / game - APS Bomet · 1.07 pts / game - Tusker
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
APS Bomet - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Tusker - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
APS Bomet
Tusker
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| APS Bomet | Liga | Tusker | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.36 | 1.89 | ▼ 1.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 39% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 43% | 30% | ▼ 21% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 39% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 21% | 34% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | • 36% | 37% | • 36% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of APS Bomet vs Tusker?
The Kenyan Premier League match finished APS Bomet 0:1 Tusker. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before APS Bomet vs Tusker?
APS Bomet score 1.07 goals per game on average and Tusker 0.86. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 50% of APS Bomet's matches and 36% of Tusker's.
What form are APS Bomet and Tusker in?
Over the last 5 games APS Bomet have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Tusker 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for APS Bomet vs Tusker?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.