Ararat vs Banants: match statistics
Ararat vs Banants: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ararat played against Banants in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The game was played on May 10, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Ararat has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Banants has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Ararat scores 0.71 goals per game and allows 2.21. Banants scores 1.75 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Ararat's games and 46% of Banants's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 42%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Banants has the higher season xG average, 1.28 to 1.26 per game. Ararat takes 11.0 shots per game, while Banants takes 10.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Ararat leads at halftime in 4% of its games and scores 0.42 goals per game after halftime. Banants leads at halftime in 46% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ararat's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Banants, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Armenian Premier League games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Banants are clear favorites: they sit 3rd in the table versus Ararat in 10th, and have 13 wins this season compared to the hosts' 3. In attack Banants have scored 42 goals this season (1.33 on average away), while Ararat have 17 goals (0.64 at home); shooting accuracy is 14% versus 6%, and average shots on target are 3.33 vs 3. Defensively the gap is even wider: Ararat concedes 1.64 goals per home match, Banants only 0.67 away; the visitors have 50% clean sheets on the road versus 18% for the hosts. xG analysis shows Ararat’s home xG at 1.28 but they convert only 0.64 goals, whereas Banants’ away xG is 1.16 and they actually score 1.33 — this indicates greater efficiency from the visitors and higher effectiveness in goal-scoring situations. Considering Banants’ 58% away wins and Ararat’s 73% home losses, I predict a victory for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS - Yes at 65% versus 35% for No. Key figures: Ararat’s home scoring average is 2.17 goals and Banants’ away average is 1.33, with Banants failing to score in only 8% of matches this season and Ararat in 25%. Assuming simple independence this implies roughly a 69% chance both teams score (100% - 25% - 8% + 2%), which is a strong signal for Goal/Goal. Form supports this: Banants over the last 5 matches averages 1.0 goals and xG 1.37, while Ararat concedes 1.8 goals on average (9 in 5 matches), increasing the likelihood the opponent will find the net. Offsetting factors include high clean sheet rates: Ararat 42% and Banants 50% away, plus a league BTTS of 45%, so I conservatively adjust the raw model down to 65%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model combines team xG (Ararat xG 1.39 vs Banants xG 1.16) and xG conceded (Banants 1.35, Ararat 1.29) and projects 1.37 expected goals for the home side and 1.22 for the away, totaling 2.59 goals. Season metrics show Over 1.5 in 75% of Ararat’s matches and 67% of Banants’ matches, and matches with at least one goal occur in 92% of cases for both teams, which reinforces the likelihood of at least two goals. Ararat averages 5.0 shots on target with a 19% conversion rate versus Banants’ 3.33 shots on target and 14% conversion, suggesting greater home effectiveness and a realistic chance of scoring. In the last 5 matches both sides have averaged 1.0 goal each (2.0 combined), which slightly reduces the probability of a high-scoring game and explains the moderate 48% for Over 2.5. Considering the projected 2.59 goals and strong seasonal Over 1.5 signals, I recommend backing Over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Ararat scores an average of 1.0 goal by half-time and concedes only 0.25, with the hosts leading at the break in 50% of matches (15 total first-half goals), indicating a strong start from Ararat. Banants have weaker away first-half stats (0.5 scored, 0.33 conceded), but over the season they average 2.08 points per game and win 58% of matches, so they are dangerous after the break. Additionally, Ararat’s xG is 1.39 versus Banants’ 1.16, Ararat registers 5.0 shots on target vs 3.33 and has a higher conversion rate (19% vs 14%), which increases the hosts’ chance of scoring in the first half. First-half goals per game are 1.25 for the hosts and 0.83 for the visitors, therefore the strongest signal from the data is a home lead at half-time and holding the win to full-time. I assign this scenario a 24% probability; significant alternatives are Half-Time draw/Full-Time away win (X/2) at 17% and away lead at the break and hold to full-time (2/2) at 17%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ararat | Banants | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Banants is 146% better for: goals scored per game.
0.71 goals / game - Ararat · 1.75 goals / game - Banants
Banants is 151% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.21 goals / game - Ararat · 0.88 goals / game - Banants
Ararat scores in 46% of games (11 of 24 meczów), while Banants keeps a clean sheet in 46% (11 of 24 meczów).
Banants scores in 83% of games (20 of 24 meczów), while Ararat keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ararat
Over / Under - Banants
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Banants is 202% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.58 pts / game - Ararat · 1.75 pts / game - Banants
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ararat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 4% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Banants - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 46% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ararat
Banants
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ararat | Liga | Banants | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.92 | 2.53 | ▲ 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 45% | • 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 47% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 32% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 70% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 79% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Ararat's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Banants. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ararat vs Banants?
The Armenian Premier League match finished Ararat 0:1 Banants. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ararat and Banants?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ararat won 0, Banants won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ararat vs Banants?
Ararat score 0.71 goals per game on average and Banants 1.75. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Ararat's matches and 46% of Banants's.
What form are Ararat and Banants in?
Over the last 5 games Ararat have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Banants 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ararat vs Banants?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


