Arda vs Montana: match statistics
Arda vs Montana: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Arda play Montana in First League (Bulgaria). The match date is 4 April 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Arda: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Montana: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Arda scores 1.17 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Montana scores 0.57 and concedes 1.49. League average: 2.30 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Arda 28%, Montana 38%. Over 2.5: Arda 36%, Montana 38%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 43%.
xG, shots and style
Arda has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.15. Arda: 10.9 shots per match, Montana: 9.0.
Match halves
Arda: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.56. Montana: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.24.
Goals by minute
Arda: 76-90+ (9 goals). Montana: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First League: 2.30 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 43%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Arda is 7th in the table while Montana is 16th; in the last 5 matches Arda has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, scoring 7 goals, whereas Montana has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses and has not scored. At home Arda averages 14 shots per match, with 4.31 on target and 57% possession, and their home xG is 1.72 (they actually score 0.92 goals per home match), while Montana away averages 8.5 shots with 2.79 on target, 43% possession, xG 1.13 and only 0.36 goals per away match. Defensively Arda concedes only 0.85 goals per home match and has 46% clean sheets, whereas Montana concedes 1.64 goals away, has 21% clean sheets and fails to score in 64% of away games; the visitors win only 7% of their away matches. The difference in efficiency is evident: shot conversion for the hosts is about 7% versus 4% for the visitors, and the advantage in xG (1.72 vs 1.13) and shots (14 vs 8.5) suggests Arda will create more high-quality chances. Considering the clearly better form (an average of 2.0 points in the last 5 matches versus 0.2 for Montana), superiority in possession, shots and a more stable defense, I predict a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Arda | Montana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.19 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Arda is 400% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Arda · 0.4 pts / match - Montana
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Arda is 105% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Arda · 0.57 goals / match - Montana
Arda is 59% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.94 goals / match - Arda · 1.49 goals / match - Montana
Arda scores in 53% of matches (19 of 36 matches), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 37 matches).
Montana scores in 49% of matches (18 of 37 matches), while Arda keeps a clean sheet in 42% (15 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Arda
Over / Under — Montana
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Arda is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.28 pts / match - Arda · 0.89 pts / match - Montana
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Arda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Montana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Arda
Montana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First League).
Teams vs league
| Arda | Liga | Montana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.11 | 2.30 | ▼ 2.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 28% | 43% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 43% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 35% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | • 64% | 63% | • 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 74% | ▼ 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Arda 0 - 1 - 0 Montana. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Arda vs Montana?
The First League match finished Arda 2:1 Montana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Arda vs Montana?
Arda score 1.17 goals per game on average and Montana 0.57. The First League average is 2.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Arda's matches and 38% of Montana's.
What form are Arda and Montana in?
Over the last 5 games Arda have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Montana 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arda vs Montana?
The statistical background for Arda vs Montana — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.