Arema vs Persijap: match statistics
Arema holds a clear advantage over Persijap in this matchup. The hosts boast a significantly better home goal difference (-1) compared to the visitors' away record (-11), indicating a more solid defense and a more effective attack. Persijap has a disastrous away form with a 75% loss rate and only a 13% win rate, failing to keep a single clean sheet in away matches. Arema scores an average of 1.56 goals per home game, while Persijap concedes an average of 2.25 goals away, suggesting a high probability of success for the hosts. Additionally, Arema has superior xG stats (1.49 vs 1.4) and higher possession (52% vs 47%), confirming their control of the game. Despite similar form in the last five matches (0.8 PPG for both teams), the home advantage and Persijap's away weakness point to a likely victory for Arema.
Arema vs Persijap: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Arema played against Persijap in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on February 2, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Arema has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Persijap has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Arema scores 1.28 goals per game and allows 1.39. Persijap scores 0.89 and allows 1.83. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 78% of Arema's games and 61% of Persijap's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 61%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Persijap has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.44 per game. Arema takes 11.8 shots per game, while Persijap takes 12.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Arema leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Persijap leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.61 after halftime.
When the teams score
Arema's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Persijap, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 1 games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Arema holds a clear advantage over Persijap in this matchup. The hosts boast a significantly better home goal difference (-1) compared to the visitors' away record (-11), indicating a more solid defense and a more effective attack. Persijap has a disastrous away form with a 75% loss rate and only a 13% win rate, failing to keep a single clean sheet in away matches. Arema scores an average of 1.56 goals per home game, while Persijap concedes an average of 2.25 goals away, suggesting a high probability of success for the hosts. Additionally, Arema has superior xG stats (1.49 vs 1.4) and higher possession (52% vs 47%), confirming their control of the game. Despite similar form in the last five matches (0.8 PPG for both teams), the home advantage and Persijap's away weakness point to a likely victory for Arema.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Arema | Persijap | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.19 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Arema is 44% better for: goals scored per game.
1.28 goals / game - Arema · 0.89 goals / game - Persijap
Arema is 32% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.39 goals / game - Arema · 1.83 goals / game - Persijap
Arema scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 meczów), while Persijap keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 meczów).
Persijap scores in 67% of games (12 of 18 meczów), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Arema
Over / Under - Persijap
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Arema is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / game - Arema · 0.78 pts / game - Persijap
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Arema - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Persijap - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Arema
Persijap
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Arema | Liga | Persijap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.67 | 2.59 | ▲ 2.72 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 78% | 53% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 49% | ▲ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 26% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 72% | 68% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 83% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Arema's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Persijap. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Arema vs Persijap?
The Liga 1 match finished Arema 1:0 Persijap. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Arema vs Persijap?
Arema score 1.28 goals per game on average and Persijap 0.89. The Liga 1 average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Arema's matches and 61% of Persijap's.
What form are Arema and Persijap in?
Over the last 5 games Arema have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Persijap 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arema vs Persijap?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Arema vs Persijap: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.