Romania - Liga IData current as of 05 August 2026

Argeș vs Csikszereda: match statistics

Argeș crest
Argeș
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Csikszereda crest
Csikszereda

Argeș vs Csikszereda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Argeș played Csikszereda in Liga I (Romania). The match was played on 31 July 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Argeș: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Csikszereda: 0-0-2, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Argeș scores 0.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Csikszereda scores 0.00 and concedes 2.50. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Argeș 0%, Csikszereda 0%. Over 2.5: Argeș 0%, Csikszereda 50%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Argeș has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.26. Argeș: 15.0 shots per match, Csikszereda: 10.0.

Match halves

Argeș: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.00. Csikszereda: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Argeș: 16-30 (1 goals). Csikszereda: 0-15 (0 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga I: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Argeș has a 100% win rate in home matches and 100% clean sheets (1/1), scoring on average 1.0 goal at home with 3 shots on target per game and a conversion rate of 11%. Csikszereda have yet to score away — 0.0 goals per game and 100% of away matches without a goal, despite averaging 11 shots and 5 on target. The visitors concede an average of 3.0 goals away and have xG against of 2.30, whereas the hosts have xG against of 1.52, indicating a higher risk of concessions for the away side. Although the visitors produce higher xG for on the road (1.38 vs the hosts' 1.03), their 0% conversion efficiency means those chances are not translating into goals. Based on this, I assess the hosts as favorites and assign them approximately a 70% probability of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In the last 5 matches Argeș had BTTS in 60% (3/5), scoring on average 1.0 and conceding 1.4; Csikszereda in their last 5 had BTTS 0% (0/5), scoring 0.6 and conceding 1.2. Looking at xG, Argeș recently generates 1.35 xG per game and Csikszereda 1.15 xG, while the visitors allow 2.09 xG versus 1.7 for the hosts, indicating greater defensive vulnerability from Csikszereda. Csikszereda averages 5.0 SOT compared to Argeș's 2.0 and has a season xG of 1.38 versus 1.20 for the hosts, so the away side has real offensive potential despite a low goals average. On the other hand the league has a low BTTS rate (36%) and a high percentage of clean sheets (64%), which slightly reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. Considering Argeș's 60% BTTS in form and the higher xG and 5.0 SOT on the visitors' side, I forecast BTTS - Yes at 65% versus 35% No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model based on the last 5 matches forecasts a total of 3.15 goals (expected xG: home 1.72 vs away 1.43), which is clearly above the league average of 2.64. Both teams show defensive frailties — Argeș conceded an average of 1.7 xG per match in the last 5 games, and Csikszereda 2.09 xG, totaling roughly 3.79 xG against. Season-long data shows 100% of matches involving both teams featured goals, and Over 1.5 occurred in 100% of matches for both sides, strongly supporting Over 1.5. Additionally, the volume of attacking actions is high: Argeș averages 10 shots per match (2 on target), and Csikszereda 11 shots (5 on target), which increases the likelihood of more goals. Considering the projected 3.15 goals and vulnerable defenses, the best line to play is Over 2.5 (pick: over 2.5), while Over 3.5 remains less certain (around 40%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In the last 5 matches Argeș trailed at the break in 3 of 5 games (60%), while Csikszereda were level at half-time in 4 of 5 (80%), suggesting the first half often finishes as a draw. The visitors have a higher xG (1.38 vs 1.20 for the hosts) and significantly more shots on target (5 vs 2), so they generate more clear chances. Over 90 minutes Csikszereda have won more often in the last 5 (40% wins vs 20% for Argeș), and the hosts average 1.0 goals scored and concede 1.4 per match in this period, indicating a definitively weaker defensive performance by the home side. On that basis I consider a Half-Time draw and a Full-Time win for the visitors (X/2) the most likely scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
ArgeșCsikszereda
15Shots1
ArgeșCsikszereda
6Shots on target1
ArgeșCsikszereda
1.82xG0.33
ArgeșCsikszereda
3Corners2
ArgeșCsikszereda
63Dangerous attacks24
ArgeșCsikszereda
12Fouls15
ArgeșCsikszereda
2Cards5
ArgeșCsikszereda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.5Goals scored / match0
ArgeșCsikszereda
1Goals conceded / match2.5
ArgeșCsikszereda
47%Average possession47%
ArgeșCsikszereda
4.5Shots on target / match3.5
ArgeșCsikszereda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15Shots per match10
ArgeșCsikszereda
4.5Shots on target3.5
ArgeșCsikszereda
3.3%Shot conversion0%
ArgeșCsikszereda
47%Possession47%
ArgeșCsikszereda
1.59xG for1.26
ArgeșCsikszereda
1.45xG against2.36
ArgeșCsikszereda

Shooting quality

Argeș: AttackingCsikszereda: Balanced
ArgeșCsikszereda
Accuracy (shots on target)30%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.110.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Argeș
LW
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Csikszereda
LL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 2.5xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 2.36BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Argeș is 150% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Argeș · 2.5 goals / match - Csikszereda

Argeș scoring profile: very strong

Argeș scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Csikszereda keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Csikszereda scoring profile: more difficult

Csikszereda scores in 0% of matches (0 of 2 matches), while Argeș keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

1Goals scored (season)0
ArgeșCsikszereda
2Goals conceded (season)5
ArgeșCsikszereda
1.5Average goals in match2.5
ArgeșCsikszereda
1Goals scored (last 5)0
ArgeșCsikszereda
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
ArgeșCsikszereda

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal0%
ArgeșCsikszereda
0%2 goals0%
ArgeșCsikszereda
0%3 goals0%
ArgeșCsikszereda
0%4 goals0%
ArgeșCsikszereda

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
ArgeșCsikszereda
50%2 goals100%
ArgeșCsikszereda
0%3 goals50%
ArgeșCsikszereda
0%4 goals0%
ArgeșCsikszereda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
ArgeșCsikszereda
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ArgeșCsikszereda
0%Scored in both halves0%
ArgeșCsikszereda

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
ArgeșCsikszereda
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
ArgeșCsikszereda
0%BTTS - last 50%
ArgeșCsikszereda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
ArgeșCsikszereda
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
ArgeșCsikszereda
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ArgeșCsikszereda

2nd half

0%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
ArgeșCsikszereda
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
ArgeșCsikszereda
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
ArgeșCsikszereda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Argeș is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Argeș · 0.5 pts / match - Csikszereda

Argeș - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
Csikszereda - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)0.5
ArgeșCsikszereda
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0
ArgeșCsikszereda
1Goals conceded (1st half)1
ArgeșCsikszereda
1.5Average goals (1st half)1
ArgeșCsikszereda
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
ArgeșCsikszereda
50%No goal before half-time100%
ArgeșCsikszereda

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.5
ArgeșCsikszereda
0Goals scored (2nd half)0
ArgeșCsikszereda
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1.5
ArgeșCsikszereda
0Average goals (2nd half)1.5
ArgeșCsikszereda
100%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ArgeșCsikszereda
100%No goal after half-time100%
ArgeșCsikszereda

Argeș - second-half results

0% W100% R0% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Csikszereda - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Argeș - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.00
Goals scored / match0.50.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.50.0
1 goal100%0%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal50%100%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Csikszereda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.500.50
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.5
Average goals in match1.01.5
1 goal50%50%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Argeș
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Csikszereda
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
0
76-90

Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
73%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
0%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
50%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 2 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Argeș

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
23%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
159%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Csikszereda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).

Teams vs league

ArgeșLigaCsikszereda
Average goals in match 1.502.75 2.50
Both teams scored 0%38% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%50% 50%
Clean sheets 50%31% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%75% 50%
Goal after half-time 0%69% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
2.13
Home goals / match
0.63
Away goals / match
+238%
Home attack advantage
+70%
Home defence advantage
+69%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ArgeșYellow cardTaylor Luvambo
  2. ArgeșSubstitutionOn: Silviu Nicolae BalaureOff: Michael Idowu
  3. CsikszeredaYellow cardRaul Ioan Palmes
  4. CsikszeredaYellow cardDarius Cristian Bota
  5. CsikszeredaYellow cardMátyás Tajti
  6. ArgeșSubstitutionOn: Claudiu MicovschiOff: Vadim Raţă
  7. ArgeșYellow cardRobert Marian Moldoveanu
  8. CsikszeredaSubstitutionOn: Ádám CzékusOff: Marton Eppel
  9. CsikszeredaSubstitutionOn: Albert Tivadar StahlOff: Szilard Veres
  10. CsikszeredaYellow cardAlbert Tivadar Stahl

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Argeș 2 - 0 - 0 Csikszereda. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

AFK Csikszereda Miercurea Ciuc
0 : 2
FC Argeș Pitești
FC Argeș Pitești
3 : 1
AFK Csikszereda Miercurea Ciuc

FAQ

What was the result of Argeș vs Csikszereda?

The Liga I match finished Argeș 1:0 Csikszereda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Argeș and Csikszereda?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Argeș won 2, Csikszereda won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Argeș vs Csikszereda?

Argeș score 0.50 goals per game on average and Csikszereda 0.00. The Liga I average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Argeș's matches and 0% of Csikszereda's.

What form are Argeș and Csikszereda in?

Over the last 5 games Argeș have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Csikszereda 0-0-2 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Argeș vs Csikszereda?

The statistical background for Argeș vs Csikszereda — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.