Arminia Bielefeld vs Energie Cottbus: match statistics
Arminia Bielefeld vs Energie Cottbus: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Arminia Bielefeld played against Energie Cottbus in 2. Bundesliga (Germany). The game was played on August 16, 2026. Venue: SchücoArena. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Arminia Bielefeld has 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Energie Cottbus has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Arminia Bielefeld scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.00. Energie Cottbus scores 3.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.33 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Arminia Bielefeld's games and 100% of Energie Cottbus's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 100%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Arminia Bielefeld has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 1.18 per game. Arminia Bielefeld takes 11.0 shots per game, while Energie Cottbus takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Arminia Bielefeld leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Energie Cottbus leads at halftime in 0% and scores 2.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Arminia Bielefeld's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (1 goals). For Energie Cottbus, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
2. Bundesliga games average 3.33 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Energie Cottbus go into the match in 3rd place in the table, while Arminia Bielefeld sit 14th. The visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 9 goals in that run, whereas the hosts recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats despite scoring 12 goals. This season, Cottbus opened with a 3:1 victory, while Arminia lost their match 1:2, giving the visitors an advantage both in points and in their defensive record so far. Bielefeld conceded an average of 1.2 goals per game in their last five outings, while Cottbus scored 1.8 goals per match over the same period. Arminia have attacking strengths, but the higher league position, better recent league result and 1.8 points per game across their last five matches all point towards a narrow away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS pick is primarily supported by the teams’ current results: Arminia scored an average of 2.4 goals in their last five matches, while Energie averaged 1.8. At the same time, the hosts conceded 1.2 goals per game during this period, compared with 1.6 for the visitors, creating scope for goals at both ends. The BTTS rate across the last five matches stands at 60% for Arminia and as high as 80% for Energie, against a league average of 67%. Their attacking potential is confirmed by xG: 1.81 for the hosts and 1.44 for the visitors, while both defenses allowed 1.18 and 1.55 xG respectively. Although some season data is incomplete, recent scoring form and regular goals conceded point more clearly towards a scenario in which both teams score at least once—BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal—rather than BTTS - No, which means that at least one team fails to score and does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have shown strong attacking productivity in their last five matches: Arminia averaged 2.4 goals, while Energie averaged 1.8. The defensive numbers are equally important, as the home side conceded an average of 1.2 goals and the visitors 1.6, supporting a projection of around 3.15 goals in the match. The quality of chances created also points to an open game: Arminia’s xG stands at 1.81 and Energie’s at 1.44, while both teams allow opponents an xG exceeding 1.18. Over 2.5 goals landed in 60% of Arminia’s recent matches and 80% of Energie’s, with the league average standing at a high 3.44 goals. However, the strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as even with below-par finishing from both attacks, at least two goals should be scored.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest-looking HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Arminia win at full-time, as Bielefeld have scored an average of 0.8 goals before the break in their last five matches, while Cottbus have also averaged 0.8, limiting either side’s early advantage. Cottbus were level at half-time in two of their last five matches, whereas the hosts, despite having no half-time draws, went into the break trailing on three occasions, making an evenly balanced opening a realistic possibility. After the break, Arminia have a clearly stronger profile: they score an average of 1.6 goals and concede just 0.4, while Energie score 1.0 and concede 0.6. The hosts also have a positive second-half goal balance of +6 over their last five appearances, compared with +2 for the visitors. Arminia’s full-season data cover just one match, so greater weight should be placed on their current form, which points to the hosts deciding the match after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Arminia Bielefeld | Energie Cottbus | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.75 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Energie Cottbus is 200% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Arminia Bielefeld · 3 goals / game - Energie Cottbus
Energie Cottbus is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
2 goals / game - Arminia Bielefeld · 1 goals / game - Energie Cottbus
Arminia Bielefeld scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 games), while Energie Cottbus keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 games).
Energie Cottbus scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 games), while Arminia Bielefeld keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Arminia Bielefeld
Over / Under - Energie Cottbus
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Arminia Bielefeld - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Energie Cottbus - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Arminia Bielefeld
Energie Cottbus
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. Bundesliga).
Teams vs league
| Arminia Bielefeld | Liga | Energie Cottbus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.00 | 3.33 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 60% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 67% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 27% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 73% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Arminia Bielefeld vs Energie Cottbus?
The 2. Bundesliga match finished Arminia Bielefeld 3:0 Energie Cottbus. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Arminia Bielefeld vs Energie Cottbus?
Arminia Bielefeld score 1.00 goals per game on average and Energie Cottbus 3.00. The 2. Bundesliga average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Arminia Bielefeld's matches and 100% of Energie Cottbus's.
What form are Arminia Bielefeld and Energie Cottbus in?
Over the last 5 games Arminia Bielefeld have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Energie Cottbus 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arminia Bielefeld vs Energie Cottbus?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


