Artsakh vs Ararat: match statistics
Artsakh vs Ararat: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Artsakh played against Ararat in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The game was played on May 19, 2026. Venue: Mika. Final score: 8:3.
Recent form
Artsakh has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Ararat has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Artsakh scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 0.67. Ararat scores 0.68 and allows 2.16. Games in this league average 2.51 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Artsakh's games and 36% of Ararat's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 52%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Artsakh has the higher season xG average, 1.81 to 1.24 per game. Artsakh takes 16.1 shots per game, while Ararat takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Artsakh leads at halftime in 58% of its games and scores 1.08 goals per game after halftime. Ararat leads at halftime in 4% and scores 0.40 after halftime.
When the teams score
Artsakh's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Ararat, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Armenian Premier League games average 2.51 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1) — Artsakh shows significantly better home metrics: 62% wins, on average 2.08 goals scored and 0.77 conceded per match, with a +17 goal differential at home. Ararat performs poorly away: on average 0.77 goals scored, 2.69 conceded, a -25 goal differential and 77% losses on the road. The difference in quality of chances also favors the hosts — Artsakh records average xG 1.96 and 6.15 shots on target per home match versus Ararat’s 1.24 xG and 3.69 shots on target away, with conversion rates of 12% vs 7%. Recent form over the last 5 matches confirms the advantage: Artsakh scored 12 and conceded 3 in the last 5 (3 wins, 2 draws) averaging 2.2 points, while Ararat has 3 scored and 7 conceded and averages 1.2 points. Based on this I estimate probabilities of 72% for a home win, 18% for a draw and 10% for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back No BTTS, because Ararat has 0% BTTS in the last 5 matches and averages 0.6 goals in those games (3 goals in 5 matches), while Artsakh averages 2.4 goals in the last 5 (12 goals). On the season both teams show low BTTS rates: 33% for the home side and 38% for the away side, below the league average of 45%, so the league generally does not favor Goal/Goal outcomes. Long-term numbers reveal a large offensive disparity: Artsakh scored 48 and conceded 16 this season, whereas Ararat has only 17 scored and 54 conceded, which increases the likelihood that only the hosts will find the net. Although the teams’ xG is similar (xG 1.25 vs 1.24), Ararat’s low finishing and their average 2.69 goals conceded away indicate they rarely score on the road. Based on this I estimate BTTS probability at 30% for 'yes' and 70% for 'no', therefore the best pick is 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model yields total expected goals of 2.83: the home side has xG 1.25 versus Ararat’s average xG allowed of 1.66 (Artsakh average 1.46), while Ararat has xG 1.24 against the home defense’s xG allowed of 1.50 (away average 1.37). A Poisson distribution with λ=2.83 gives probabilities of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) ≈77%, at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) ≈54% and at least 4 goals (Over 3.5) ≈32%. In the last 5 matches Artsakh scored 12 goals (2.4 per game) and conceded 3 (0.6), whereas Ararat scored 3 (0.6) and conceded 7 (1.4), which supports a higher-scoring outlook for this fixture. Season metrics confirm the trend: Ararat has 100% of matches Over 1.5 and 62% Over 2.5, while Artsakh has 58% Over 1.5 and 42% Over 2.5, therefore the strongest signal from the data is to play Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical and form analysis points to a scenario in which Artsakh will lead at the break and win the match (1/1). In their last five matches Artsakh scores an average of 2.4 goals per game and 1.0 goal by half-time, leading at the break in 60% of those fixtures, whereas Ararat averages only 0.6 goals per game and 0.0 by half-time with 0% leads at the break across those five appearances. Seasonally Ararat concedes an average of 2.69 goals per game versus 1.58 conceded by Artsakh, and although the teams’ xG are similar (1.25 vs 1.24), Ararat’s xG against is higher (1.66 vs 1.50), indicating greater defensive vulnerability from the visitors. The second half is goal-prone (83% of home matches and 92% of away matches have at least one goal after the break), and Ararat have conceded as many as 13 goals in minutes 76–90, which increases the likelihood that the home side will hold their lead. Taking the above into account, the safest scenario is 1/1 (42% probability), with X/1 (20%) and X/X (12%) as the main alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Artsakh | Ararat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Artsakh is 83% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Artsakh · 1.2 pts / game - Ararat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Artsakh is 194% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - Artsakh · 0.68 goals / game - Ararat
Artsakh is 222% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.67 goals / game - Artsakh · 2.16 goals / game - Ararat
Artsakh scores in 79% of games (19 of 24 meczów), while Ararat keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 25 meczów).
Ararat scores in 44% of games (11 of 25 meczów), while Artsakh keeps a clean sheet in 58% (14 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Artsakh
Over / Under - Ararat
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Artsakh is 240% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.04 pts / game - Artsakh · 0.6 pts / game - Ararat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Artsakh - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 58% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Ararat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 4% of games and wins 12%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Artsakh
Ararat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Artsakh | Liga | Ararat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.67 | 2.51 | ▲ 2.84 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 44% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 46% | ▲ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 58% | 33% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 69% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 79% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Artsakh's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Ararat. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Artsakh vs Ararat?
The Armenian Premier League match finished Artsakh 8:3 Ararat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Artsakh and Ararat?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Artsakh won 2, Ararat won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Artsakh vs Ararat?
Artsakh score 2.00 goals per game on average and Ararat 0.68. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Artsakh's matches and 36% of Ararat's.
What form are Artsakh and Ararat in?
Over the last 5 games Artsakh have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Ararat 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Artsakh vs Ararat?
The statistical background for Artsakh vs Ararat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


