AS Kigali vs Gicumbi: match statistics
AS Kigali vs Gicumbi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
AS Kigali played against Gicumbi in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The game was played on May 15, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
AS Kigali has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Gicumbi has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
AS Kigali scores 0.69 goals per game and allows 1.16. Gicumbi scores 1.10 and allows 1.55. Games in this league average 2.07 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of AS Kigali's games and 58% of Gicumbi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 28% and 48%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 37% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
AS Kigali has the higher season xG average, 1.25 to 1.11 per game. AS Kigali takes 7.6 shots per game, while Gicumbi takes 6.8.
First-half and second-half trends
AS Kigali leads at halftime in 3% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Gicumbi leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.48 after halftime.
When the teams score
AS Kigali's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For Gicumbi, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
National Soccer League games average 2.07 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 37% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw (X): AS Kigali records as many as 60% of home matches ending in draws and scores only 0.47 goals per home game, failing to score in 60% of fixtures. Gicumbi has better recent form — 3 wins in the last 5 matches, 7 goals in that period and an average of 1.8 points per game versus AS Kigali’s 0.8. Defensively the hosts have the edge: AS Kigali concedes 0.93 goals at home with xG against 1.29, while Gicumbi concedes 1.6 goals away with xG against 1.19, suggesting a goal-limited affair. Offensively the visitors are more efficient — 15% shot conversion away compared to just 5% for the hosts, despite the hosts taking more shots (8.93 vs 7.43) and more shots on target (3.27 vs 2.57). Considering AS Kigali’s high home draw rate and Gicumbi’s superior form, I assess draw probability at 50%, away win 30% and home win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I select BTTS - Yes as the more likely outcome due to clearly elevated season metrics for both teams: AS Kigali has BTTS in 63% of matches, Gicumbi in 53%, versus the league level of 44%. Both sides defend poorly — AS Kigali concedes 1.5 goals per match, Gicumbi 1.6, and clean sheet expected is low at only 19% (home) and 20% (away). In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 40% of games for both teams, though the away side scored 7 goals (1.4 per match) versus 3 goals for the home team (0.6), indicating greater recent attacking efficiency from Gicumbi. Attacking xG is 1.10 for AS Kigali and 1.13 for Gicumbi, with xG against of 1.23 and 1.19 respectively, and average shots on target 2.44 vs 2.57 — this suggests both teams create and allow chances. Considering these figures, I assess the BTTS probability at 65% versus 35% for No Goal, because the high season BTTS rates (63%/53%) and the large number of goals conceded (1.5 and 1.6) provide a stronger signal for Yes despite moderate form over the last five matches.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Offensive xG are 1.10 for AS Kigali and 1.13 for Gicumbi; after accounting for xG conceded (1.19 for Gicumbi and 1.23 for AS Kigali) adjusted expected goals are roughly 1.15 for the home side and 1.18 for the visitors, totaling 2.33 goals. Seasonal rates show 88% of AS Kigali matches and 73% of Gicumbi matches finished over 1.5 goals, with BTTS in 63% and 53% of fixtures respectively, which strongly favors Over 1.5. Signals for Over 2.5 are mixed: AS Kigali have 56% of matches >2.5, Gicumbi 40%, and the league average for Over 2.5 is 37% — with expected 2.33 goals I assess Over 2.5 at about a 45% probability. Over 3.5 is unlikely (seasonal 13% and 33%); additionally average shots 6.75/7.43 and on-target 2.44/2.57 do not indicate regularly exceeding the 3.5 threshold, so Under 3.5 is the preferred hedge. On this basis I recommend an OVER on the 1.5 line as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is a half-time draw with a home win at full-time (X/1). A draw at the break occurs in 50% of AS Kigali’s matches, while the home side led at half-time in 25% of fixtures, so the most common scoreline at 45 minutes is a draw. AS Kigali has a higher average points per match (1.31 vs 0.93 for Gicumbi) and wins 38% of games compared to the visitors’ 20% win rate, suggesting that draws are more often converted into home wins. Hosts score on average 1.5 goals after the break versus 1.07 for the away side, and shot conversion is 17% versus 15%, which increases the probability of a second-half decision in favor of the home team. However, note the visitors’ recent form over the last five matches (60% wins for Gicumbi vs 20% for AS Kigali), so I assign moderate weight also to the scenarios X/2 and 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| AS Kigali | Gicumbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Gicumbi is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - AS Kigali · 1.8 pts / game - Gicumbi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gicumbi is 59% better for: goals scored per game.
0.69 goals / game - AS Kigali · 1.1 goals / game - Gicumbi
AS Kigali is 34% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.16 goals / game - AS Kigali · 1.55 goals / game - Gicumbi
AS Kigali scores in 56% of games (18 of 32 meczów), while Gicumbi keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 31 meczów).
Gicumbi scores in 71% of games (22 of 31 meczów), while AS Kigali keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - AS Kigali
Over / Under - Gicumbi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gicumbi is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.75 pts / game - AS Kigali · 1.1 pts / game - Gicumbi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AS Kigali - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 3% of games and wins 19%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Gicumbi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
AS Kigali
Gicumbi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).
Teams vs league
| AS Kigali | Liga | Gicumbi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.84 | 2.07 | ▲ 2.65 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 44% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 28% | 37% | ▲ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 35% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 60% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 72% | 69% | ▲ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from AS Kigali's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Gicumbi. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of AS Kigali vs Gicumbi?
The National Soccer League match finished AS Kigali 2:1 Gicumbi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before AS Kigali vs Gicumbi?
AS Kigali score 0.69 goals per game on average and Gicumbi 1.10. The National Soccer League average is 2.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 38% of AS Kigali's matches and 58% of Gicumbi's.
What form are AS Kigali and Gicumbi in?
Over the last 5 games AS Kigali have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Gicumbi 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AS Kigali vs Gicumbi?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


