Asan Mugunghwa vs Ansan Greeners: match statistics
Asan Mugunghwa vs Ansan Greeners: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Asan Mugunghwa played against Ansan Greeners in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on August 7, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Asan Mugunghwa has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Ansan Greeners has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Asan Mugunghwa scores 1.47 goals per game and allows 1.21. Ansan Greeners scores 1.05 and allows 1.89. Games in this league average 2.82 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of Asan Mugunghwa's games and 63% of Ansan Greeners's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 63%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Asan Mugunghwa has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.13 per game. Asan Mugunghwa takes 11.9 shots per game, while Ansan Greeners takes 8.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Asan Mugunghwa leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Ansan Greeners leads at halftime in 16% and scores 0.58 after halftime.
When the teams score
Asan Mugunghwa's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Ansan Greeners, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.82 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Asan Mugunghwa sit 7th, while Ansan Greeners are only 15th, with the hosts’ overall season record standing at 7 wins and 6 defeats compared with the visitors’ 5 wins and 11 losses. At home, Asan average 1.8 goals per match and have failed to score in none of their games, whereas Ansan average just one goal away from home and draw a blank in 43% of matches. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 10.6 shots and 3.9 shots on target per game, compared with Ansan’s 7.14 attempts and 3.29 shots on target. The key factor is the superior quality of chances, with Asan averaging 1.32 xG at home, while the visitors’ defense allows opponents as much as 2.14 xG per away match. Recent form also slightly favors the hosts, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 10 goals in that run, whereas Ansan have found the net only 5 times during the same period.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Asan Mugunghwa has a very clear seasonal BTTS profile, with both teams scoring in 83% of its matches, while the hosts have kept a clean sheet in none of them. Ansan Greeners more often produce one-sided games, as BTTS has landed in only 29% of their matches, and as many as 43% of their games ended without them scoring. Current form nevertheless slightly supports the BTTS - Yes option: in their last 5 appearances, Asan averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Ansan averaged 1.0 scored and 2.0 conceded. The hosts also have a high xG from their last five matches, at 2.00, while the visitors' defense allows an average of 1.94 xG. Ansan's weaker xG figure of 0.61 limits confidence in the pick, but Asan's zero clean-sheet rate gives the visitors a realistic chance of scoring at least once.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Asan Mugunghwa have averaged 2.0 goals scored and created chances worth 2.0 xG in their last five matches, while Ansan Greeners have conceded 2.0 goals per game over the same period. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet all season, while their opponents have scored at least once in 56% of matches, increasing the likelihood of the visitors contributing to the scoreline. The 1.5 line has been surpassed in 92% of Asan’s matches and 71% of Ansan’s, clearly more often than the 2.5 threshold, which stands at 75% and 43%, respectively. In their last five matches, both teams recorded at least three goals in 60% of games, but the visitors’ weaker attack, generating just 0.61 xG, limits confidence in higher lines. The projected total of 2.70 goals indicates that Over 1.5 is the strongest and most reliable selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Asan Mugunghwa victory at the final whistle, corresponding to the HT/FT pick X/2. In their last five matches, Ansan Greeners have lost the first half in 80% of cases, scoring just 0.2 goals before the break and conceding 1.4 per game. The hosts are also not a team that takes the lead early, having been level at half-time in 40% of their recent appearances, with an average of only 0.4 goals scored before the break. After the interval, Asan have shown a clear improvement in their recent form, averaging 1.6 goals in second halves, compared with 0.8 for Ansan. In addition, the hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches and are averaging 2.0 goals per game overall, while the visitors have conceded an average of 2.0 goals during this period.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Asan Mugunghwa | Ansan Greeners | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Asan Mugunghwa is 40% better for: goals scored per game.
1.47 goals / game - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.05 goals / game - Ansan Greeners
Asan Mugunghwa is 56% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.21 goals / game - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.89 goals / game - Ansan Greeners
Asan Mugunghwa scores in 79% of games (15 of 19 games), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 games).
Ansan Greeners scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 games), while Asan Mugunghwa keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Asan Mugunghwa
Over / Under - Ansan Greeners
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Asan Mugunghwa is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.95 pts / game - Asan Mugunghwa · 0.89 pts / game - Ansan Greeners
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Asan Mugunghwa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Ansan Greeners - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Asan Mugunghwa
Ansan Greeners
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Asan Mugunghwa | Liga | Ansan Greeners | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.68 | 2.82 | ▲ 2.95 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 64% | • 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 56% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 22% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 72% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 78% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Asan Mugunghwa's perspective: 4 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Ansan Greeners. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Asan Mugunghwa vs Ansan Greeners?
The K League 2 match finished Asan Mugunghwa 1:1 Ansan Greeners. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Asan Mugunghwa and Ansan Greeners?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Asan Mugunghwa won 4, Ansan Greeners won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Asan Mugunghwa vs Ansan Greeners?
Asan Mugunghwa score 1.47 goals per game on average and Ansan Greeners 1.05. The K League 2 average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Asan Mugunghwa's matches and 63% of Ansan Greeners's.
What form are Asan Mugunghwa and Ansan Greeners in?
Over the last 5 games Asan Mugunghwa have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Ansan Greeners 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Asan Mugunghwa vs Ansan Greeners?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


