South Korea - K League 2Data current as of September 07, 2026

Asan Mugunghwa vs Gyeongnam: match statistics

Asan Mugunghwa crest
Asan Mugunghwa
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Gyeongnam crest
Gyeongnam

Asan Mugunghwa vs Gyeongnam: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Asan Mugunghwa played against Gyeongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on July 12, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Asan Mugunghwa has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Gyeongnam has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Asan Mugunghwa scores 1.53 goals per game and allows 1.20. Gyeongnam scores 1.27 and allows 1.60. Games in this league average 2.80 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Asan Mugunghwa's games and 67% of Gyeongnam's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 53%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Asan Mugunghwa has the higher season xG average, 1.38 to 1.31 per game. Asan Mugunghwa takes 10.5 shots per game, while Gyeongnam takes 11.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Asan Mugunghwa leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Gyeongnam leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.87 after halftime.

When the teams score

Asan Mugunghwa's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Gyeongnam, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 2 games average 2.80 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Asan Mugunghwa holds an offensive efficiency advantage at home — averaging 1.88 goals scored per game with an average xG of 1.29, while Gyeongnam scores only 0.83 goals away with xG 1.26. The gap in output stems from conversion: the home side posts an 18% shot conversion on 10.38 shots per game, whereas the visitors convert 8% on 10.5 shots, so Asan turns a similar volume of attempts into far more goals. Goal and clean sheet metrics are also significant — Asan has not had a match without scoring at home (0% of home matches without a goal) and records 25% clean sheets, while Gyeongnam has 50% of away matches without scoring and 0% away clean sheets. Over the last 5 matches both teams average 1.6 points and share an identical 2-2-1 record, but across the season Asan wins 50% of home fixtures with a +3 goal difference, whereas Gyeongnam as a visitor has only a 17% win rate and a -4 goal difference. Considering the superior finishing (1.88 vs 0.83), better conversion (18% vs 8%) and more consistent home metrics, I favor the home side to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS (Both Teams To Score) appears more likely: Asan has a seasonal BTTS rate of 78% (last 5 matches 60%), while Gyeongnam is 50% for the season but 80% in the last 5. Both teams produce similar xG — Asan 1.34 vs Gyeongnam 1.26 — and seasonal goals per game of 1.56 for Asan and 0.83 for Gyeongnam, with last 5 figures of 1.4 for Asan and 1.6 for Gyeongnam. Defenses are vulnerable: Asan concedes 1.67 goals on average this season and has only 11% clean sheets, while Gyeongnam has 0% clean sheets and concedes 1.5 on average (1.6 in the last 5). Additionally, Asan averages 11.78 shots and 3.67 on target with a 13% conversion rate, whereas Gyeongnam averages 10.5 shots and 3.33 on target with an 8% conversion rate, creating real chances for both sides. Considering Asan’s 78% BTTS, Gyeongnam’s 80% in the last 5 and a league-wide BTTS level of 62%, I assign BTTS - Yes a 72% probability versus 28% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Statistics point to a match with goals: Asan scores 1.56 and concedes 1.67 at home, while Gyeongnam away scores 0.83 and concedes 1.50; xG are 1.34 for Asan and 1.26 for Gyeongnam, yielding an estimate of ~1.39 goals for the home side and ~1.27 for the visitors (total 2.66). In the last 5 matches Asan has scored 7 goals (1.4 per game) with average xG 1.13, and Gyeongnam 8 goals (1.6) with xG 1.45, confirming moderate attacking potential for both teams. Both teams have a high share of Over 1.5 this season: 78% (Asan) and 83% (Gyeongnam), hence a high probability for Over 1.5 (81%). For the 2.5 line there is a divergence — Asan at home has 78% of matches over 2.5, Gyeongnam away only 17%, and the last 5 matches for both teams show 60% Over 2.5, which together gives a moderate edge to Over 2.5 (56%). Over 3.5 is less likely: 44% (Asan) vs 17% (Gyeongnam) averages to ~30.5%, therefore I assigned 31% to Over 3.5 (Under 69%); the strongest signal from the data is therefore Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Asan average 1.56 goals per match versus Gyeongnam’s 0.83, with xG of 1.34 versus 1.26, confirming Asan’s offensive advantage. At half-time the hosts led in 22% of matches and were level in 44% (the visitors were level at half in 50%), and on average Asan score 0.44 goals by the break versus 0.33 for their opponents, so first halves often finish tied with a low goal count. In the second half Asan average 1.11 goals versus 0.5 for Gyeongnam and have 89% of matches with over 0.5 goals in the second half (visitors 67%), which indicates that decisive action comes after the break. Additionally the hosts have 44% wins this season versus 17% for the visitors and a higher shot conversion rate 13% vs 8%, so the strongest signal is a turnaround after half-time. Therefore I select a Half-Time draw and a Home win after 90 minutes (X/1) as the most likely scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

34Possession (%)66
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
9Shots16
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
6Shots on target3
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
1.36xG1.84
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
0Corners2
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
50Dangerous attacks85
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
11Fouls14
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
2Cards3
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
1.53Goals scored / game1.27
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
1.2Goals allowed / game1.6
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
51%Average possession48%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
4.13Shots on target / game3.53
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.53Shots per game11.27
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
4.13Shots on target3.53
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
14.6%Shot conversion11.2%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
51%Possession48%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
1.38xG for1.31
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
1.37xG against1.28
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam

Shooting quality

Asan Mugunghwa: Efficient finishingGyeongnam: Balanced
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
Accuracy (shots on target)39%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Asan Mugunghwa
LDWDW
Season result split
40% W33% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-4
1.53 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Gyeongnam
DWLDW
Season result split
33% W27% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-6
1.27 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DWLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Asan Mugunghwa is 20% better for: goals scored per game.

1.53 goals / game - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.27 goals / game - Gyeongnam

Asan Mugunghwa is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.2 goals / game - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.6 goals / game - Gyeongnam

Asan Mugunghwa scoring profile: very strong

Asan Mugunghwa scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 meczów), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 meczów).

Gyeongnam scoring profile: strong

Gyeongnam scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 meczów), while Asan Mugunghwa keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 meczów).

23Goals scored (season)19
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
18Goals conceded (season)24
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
2.73Average goals per game2.87
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
7Goals scored (last 5)8
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal73%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
53%2 goals40%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
20%3 goals13%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
0%4 goals0%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal93%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
40%2 goals53%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
13%3 goals7%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
0%4 goals7%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time27%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
13%BTTS in both halves0%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
27%Scored in both halves27%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
60%BTTS - last 580%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Asan Mugunghwa is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Asan Mugunghwa · 0.87 pts / game - Gyeongnam

Asan Mugunghwa - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Gyeongnam - half-time state
13% leading47% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)0.87
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.13
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
47%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
53%No goal before half-time60%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.73Points per game (2nd half)1.2
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.73
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
60%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam
40%No goal after half-time40%
Asan MugunghwaGyeongnam

Asan Mugunghwa - second-half results

40% W53% R7% P
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Gyeongnam - second-half results

27% W40% R33% P
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding254%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Asan Mugunghwa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.80
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Gyeongnam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.60
Goals scored / game0.21.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game0.82.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Asan Mugunghwa
ScoredConceded
0
5
0-15
5
2
16-30
3
5
31-45
6
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Gyeongnam
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
8
31-45
2
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Asan Mugunghwa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Gyeongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Asan MugunghwaLigaGyeongnam
Average goals per game 2.732.80 2.87
Both teams scored 60%63% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%57% 53%
Clean sheets 33%22% 7%
Goal before half-time 73%72% 60%
Goal after half-time 67%77% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / game
1.40
Away goals / game
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defensive advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Asan MugunghwaGoalJoon-Ho SonAssist: Ju-Sung Kim
  2. Asan MugunghwaYellow cardHee-Won Choe
  3. GyeongnamGoalHyeon-Oh KimAssist: Il-Lok Yun
  4. Asan MugunghwaYellow cardHee-Won Choe
  5. GyeongnamYellow cardIl-Lok Yun
  6. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Hyun-Seo BaeOff: Il-Lok Yun
  7. GyeongnamYellow cardJeong-Hyun Kim
  8. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Chung-Geun JeongOff: Hyeon-Oh Kim
  9. GyeongnamYellow cardHyun-Seo Bae

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Asan Mugunghwa's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Gyeongnam. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Asan Mugunghwa FC
1 : 0
Gyeongnam FC
Asan Mugunghwa FC
2 : 2
Gyeongnam FC
Gyeongnam FC
1 : 3
Asan Mugunghwa FC

FAQ

What was the result of Asan Mugunghwa vs Gyeongnam?

The K League 2 match finished Asan Mugunghwa 1:1 Gyeongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Asan Mugunghwa and Gyeongnam?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Asan Mugunghwa won 2, Gyeongnam won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Asan Mugunghwa vs Gyeongnam?

Asan Mugunghwa score 1.53 goals per game on average and Gyeongnam 1.27. The K League 2 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Asan Mugunghwa's matches and 67% of Gyeongnam's.

What form are Asan Mugunghwa and Gyeongnam in?

Over the last 5 games Asan Mugunghwa have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Gyeongnam 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Asan Mugunghwa vs Gyeongnam?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.