South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Asan Mugunghwa vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics

Asan Mugunghwa crest
Asan Mugunghwa
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land

Asan Mugunghwa vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Asan Mugunghwa play Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 9 May 2026 at 07:00. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Asan Mugunghwa: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Seoul E-Land: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Asan Mugunghwa scores 1.41 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. Seoul E-Land scores 1.76 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Asan Mugunghwa 59%, Seoul E-Land 65%. Over 2.5: Asan Mugunghwa 53%, Seoul E-Land 76%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.41. Asan Mugunghwa: 10.9 shots per match, Seoul E-Land: 13.3.

Match halves

Asan Mugunghwa: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.88. Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.12.

Goals by minute

Asan Mugunghwa: 76-90+ (7 goals). Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Seoul E-Land are the favorites for this fixture: the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 11 goals in that period, while Asan have 1 win and 6 goals in their last 5. Seoul’s key advantage is defense — the visitors concede only 0.8 goals on average away and have 40% clean sheets, whereas Asan concede 1.6 goals at home and have 20% clean sheets. In terms of chance quality, Seoul average 5 on-target shots per away match versus Asan’s 4.2 on-target shots at home and have a higher conversion rate of 15% compared to 14%. However, Asan consistently score at home — averaging 1.8 goals per match and have yet to register a scoreless home game (0% matches without a goal); their home xG is 1.56 versus Seoul’s 1.4 xG away. Considering form (Seoul 2.4 average points in the last 5 vs 1.2 for Asan), superior defense (0.8 vs 1.6) and greater shot quality, I forecast a Seoul victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
6Shots15
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
3Shots on target2
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0.88xG1.54
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
4Corners8
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
39Dangerous attacks62
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
16Fouls13
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0Cards2
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
1.41Goals scored / match1.76
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
1.18Goals conceded / match1.24
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
50%Average possession50%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
4.35Shots on target / match5.41
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.94Shots per match13.29
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
4.35Shots on target5.41
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
12.9%Shot conversion13.3%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
50%Possession50%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
1.41xG for1.61
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
1.37xG against1.24
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

Shooting quality

Asan Mugunghwa: BalancedSeoul E-Land: Efficient finishing
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
Accuracy (shots on target)40%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seoul E-Land is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Asan Mugunghwa
WDWDL
Season result split
35% W35% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-5
1.41 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Seoul E-Land
WWLWD
Season result split
53% W18% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-5
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.86Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

1.41 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.76 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Asan Mugunghwa is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.18 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.24 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Asan Mugunghwa scoring profile: very strong

Asan Mugunghwa scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Asan Mugunghwa keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

24Goals scored (season)30
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
20Goals conceded (season)21
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
2.59Average goals in match3
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
7Goals scored (last 5)10
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal88%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
47%2 goals59%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
18%3 goals29%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0%4 goals0%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
35%2 goals41%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
12%3 goals12%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0%4 goals0%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time24%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
12%BTTS in both halves0%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
24%Scored in both halves35%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
60%BTTS - last 580%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seoul E-Land is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.47 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Asan Mugunghwa - half-time state
18% leading47% draw35% trailing
Seoul E-Land - half-time state
35% leading41% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.47
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.12
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
47%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
53%No goal before half-time47%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

After half-time (2nd half)

1.59Points per match (2nd half)1.82
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)1.12
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
0.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.88
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
59%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land
47%No goal after half-time29%
Asan MugunghwaSeoul E-Land

Asan Mugunghwa - second-half results

35% W53% R12% P
17
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

53% W24% R24% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding151%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Asan Mugunghwa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Seoul E-Land - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Asan Mugunghwa
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
5
2
16-30
3
6
31-45
6
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
5
4
61-75
10
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Asan Mugunghwa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Asan MugunghwaLigaSeoul E-Land
Average goals in match 2.592.75 3.00
Both teams scored 59%61% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 76%
Clean sheets 29%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 71%73% 76%
Goal after half-time 65%76% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Asan Mugunghwa 0 - 1 - 2 Seoul E-Land. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Seoul E-Land FC
4 : 1
Asan Mugunghwa FC
Asan Mugunghwa FC
1 : 1
Seoul E-Land FC
Seoul E-Land FC
2 : 1
Asan Mugunghwa FC

FAQ

What was the result of Asan Mugunghwa vs Seoul E-Land?

The K League 2 match finished Asan Mugunghwa 3:0 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Asan Mugunghwa and Seoul E-Land?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Asan Mugunghwa won 0, Seoul E-Land won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Asan Mugunghwa vs Seoul E-Land?

Asan Mugunghwa score 1.41 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.76. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Asan Mugunghwa's matches and 65% of Seoul E-Land's.

What form are Asan Mugunghwa and Seoul E-Land in?

Over the last 5 games Asan Mugunghwa have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Asan Mugunghwa vs Seoul E-Land?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.