Norway - First DivisionData current as of 05 August 2026

Åsane vs Kongsvinger: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Åsane vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Åsane play Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The match date is 9 August 2026.

Current form

Åsane: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Kongsvinger: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Åsane scores 1.50 and concedes 2.31 goals per match. Kongsvinger scores 2.69 and concedes 1.56. League average: 3.77 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Åsane 50%, Kongsvinger 81%. Over 2.5: Åsane 69%, Kongsvinger 88%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

Kongsvinger has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.25. Åsane: 9.6 shots per match, Kongsvinger: 14.0.

Match halves

Åsane: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.94. Kongsvinger: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.56.

Goals by minute

Åsane: 76-90+ (9 goals). Kongsvinger: 46-60 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.77 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 67%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(5.58)
(4.90)
(1.45)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match2.69
ÅsaneKongsvinger
2.31Goals conceded / match1.56
ÅsaneKongsvinger
46%Average possession55%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
4.44Shots on target / match5.75
ÅsaneKongsvinger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.63Shots per match14
ÅsaneKongsvinger
4.44Shots on target5.75
ÅsaneKongsvinger
15.6%Shot conversion19.2%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
46%Possession55%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
1.25xG for1.71
ÅsaneKongsvinger
1.88xG against1.52
ÅsaneKongsvinger

Shooting quality

Åsane: Counter-attackingKongsvinger: Dominant
ÅsaneKongsvinger
Accuracy (shots on target)46%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.47

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kongsvinger is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Åsane · 1.4 pts / match - Kongsvinger

Åsane
LWLDL
Season result split
25% W13% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-10
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-3
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 2.14BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Kongsvinger
DLWWL
Season result split
63% W19% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-3-3
2.06 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kongsvinger is 79% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Åsane · 2.69 goals / match - Kongsvinger

Kongsvinger is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.31 goals / match - Åsane · 1.56 goals / match - Kongsvinger

Åsane scoring profile: very strong

Åsane scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

Kongsvinger scoring profile: very strong

Kongsvinger scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while Åsane keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

24Goals scored (season)43
ÅsaneKongsvinger
37Goals conceded (season)25
ÅsaneKongsvinger
3.81Average goals in match4.25
ÅsaneKongsvinger
9Goals scored (last 5)18
ÅsaneKongsvinger
14Goals conceded (last 5)13
ÅsaneKongsvinger

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal94%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
50%2 goals81%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
25%3 goals50%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
6%4 goals25%
ÅsaneKongsvinger

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal88%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
56%2 goals38%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
50%3 goals19%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
25%4 goals13%
ÅsaneKongsvinger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time31%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
6%BTTS in both halves6%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
31%Scored in both halves50%
ÅsaneKongsvinger

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
60%BTTS - last 5100%
ÅsaneKongsvinger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time31%
ÅsaneKongsvinger

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time44%
ÅsaneKongsvinger

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kongsvinger is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Åsane · 1.5 pts / match - Kongsvinger

Åsane - half-time state
25% leading38% draw38% trailing
Kongsvinger - half-time state
44% leading19% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.5
ÅsaneKongsvinger
0.56Goals scored (1st half)1.13
ÅsaneKongsvinger
1.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
ÅsaneKongsvinger
1.69Average goals (1st half)1.88
ÅsaneKongsvinger
50%Clean sheet before half-time44%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
50%No goal before half-time38%
ÅsaneKongsvinger

After half-time (2nd half)

1.19Points per match (2nd half)2
ÅsaneKongsvinger
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)1.56
ÅsaneKongsvinger
1.19Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
ÅsaneKongsvinger
2.13Average goals (2nd half)2.38
ÅsaneKongsvinger
44%Clean sheet after half-time44%
ÅsaneKongsvinger
50%No goal after half-time19%
ÅsaneKongsvinger

Åsane - second-half results

31% W25% R44% P
18
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kongsvinger - second-half results

63% W13% R25% P
24
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Åsane - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match2.00.8
Average goals in match2.62.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-7+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Kongsvinger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match2.01.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match3.23.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals80%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 10

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Åsane
ScoredConceded
1
8
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
8
31-45
5
4
46-60
1
7
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Kongsvinger
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
8
2
16-30
3
8
31-45
11
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 2.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Åsane

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Kongsvinger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.94
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.98
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
165%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

ÅsaneLigaKongsvinger
Average goals in match 3.813.77 4.25
Both teams scored 50%61% 81%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%73% 88%
Clean sheets 19%21% 13%
Goal before half-time 75%75% 88%
Goal after half-time 81%88% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.77
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.14
Home goals / match
1.63
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
18%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Åsane 0 - 2 - 1 Kongsvinger. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Kongsvinger
3 : 1
Åsane
Åsane Fotball
0 : 0
Kongsvinger IL
Kongsvinger IL
1 : 1
Åsane Fotball

FAQ

When do Åsane and Kongsvinger play?

Åsane face Kongsvinger on 9 August 2026 in First Division. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Åsane and Kongsvinger?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Åsane won 0, Kongsvinger won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Åsane vs Kongsvinger?

Åsane score 1.50 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.69. The First Division average is 3.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Åsane's matches and 81% of Kongsvinger's.

What form are Åsane and Kongsvinger in?

Over the last 5 games Åsane have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Kongsvinger 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Åsane vs Kongsvinger?

The statistical background for Åsane vs Kongsvinger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.