Norway - First DivisionData current as of 16 July 2026

Åsane vs Moss: match statistics

Åsane crest
Åsane
2 : 3half-time 1:0
Moss crest
Moss

Åsane vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Åsane play Moss in First Division (Norway). The match date is 6 April 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Åsane: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Moss: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Åsane scores 1.43 and concedes 2.14 goals per match. Moss scores 1.64 and concedes 2.29. League average: 3.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Åsane 43%, Moss 79%. Over 2.5: Åsane 64%, Moss 86%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

Moss has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.24. Åsane: 9.6 shots per match, Moss: 14.6.

Match halves

Åsane: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 1.00. Moss: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Åsane: 76-90+ (9 goals). Moss: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I back an away win because the numbers favor Moss. In the last 5 matches Moss scored 6 and conceded 7, while Åsane has 5 scored and 10 conceded, equating to 1.2 goals scored and 1.4 conceded per match for Moss versus 1.0 scored and 2.0 conceded for Åsane. The visitors collected 1.0 point per match in their last 5 fixtures, hosts only 0.6, and Åsane failed to win any of those five games (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses) compared to Moss’s 1-2-2 record. League position 7 for Moss versus 16 for Åsane further confirms the visitors’ edge, so I assign a higher probability to a Moss victory, with a draw still a realistic possibility.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
ÅsaneMoss
10Shots16
ÅsaneMoss
2Shots on target8
ÅsaneMoss
1.16xG2.05
ÅsaneMoss
3Corners8
ÅsaneMoss
53Dangerous attacks67
ÅsaneMoss
12Fouls13
ÅsaneMoss
4Cards3
ÅsaneMoss

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.43Goals scored / match1.64
ÅsaneMoss
2.14Goals conceded / match2.29
ÅsaneMoss
47%Average possession49%
ÅsaneMoss
4.29Shots on target / match5.36
ÅsaneMoss

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.64Shots per match14.57
ÅsaneMoss
4.29Shots on target5.36
ÅsaneMoss
14.8%Shot conversion11.3%
ÅsaneMoss
47%Possession49%
ÅsaneMoss
1.24xG for1.69
ÅsaneMoss
1.78xG against1.75
ÅsaneMoss

Shooting quality

Åsane: Counter-attackingMoss: Attacking
ÅsaneMoss
Accuracy (shots on target)45%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Åsane is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Åsane · 0.8 pts / match - Moss

Åsane
LWLWL
Season result split
29% W7% R64% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-9
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 0.86Opponent xG: 2.20BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Moss
DWLLL
Season result split
36% W14% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-7
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Moss is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

1.43 goals / match - Åsane · 1.64 goals / match - Moss

Åsane is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.14 goals / match - Åsane · 2.29 goals / match - Moss

Åsane scoring profile: very strong

Åsane scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).

Moss scoring profile: very strong

Moss scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Åsane keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).

20Goals scored (season)23
ÅsaneMoss
30Goals conceded (season)32
ÅsaneMoss
3.57Average goals in match3.93
ÅsaneMoss
8Goals scored (last 5)9
ÅsaneMoss
11Goals conceded (last 5)14
ÅsaneMoss

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal86%
ÅsaneMoss
50%2 goals50%
ÅsaneMoss
21%3 goals21%
ÅsaneMoss
7%4 goals7%
ÅsaneMoss

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal93%
ÅsaneMoss
50%2 goals79%
ÅsaneMoss
43%3 goals43%
ÅsaneMoss
21%4 goals14%
ÅsaneMoss

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time29%
ÅsaneMoss
7%BTTS in both halves7%
ÅsaneMoss
29%Scored in both halves21%
ÅsaneMoss

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS71%
ÅsaneMoss
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
ÅsaneMoss
60%BTTS - last 580%
ÅsaneMoss

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
ÅsaneMoss
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
ÅsaneMoss
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time36%
ÅsaneMoss

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
ÅsaneMoss
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
ÅsaneMoss
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time36%
ÅsaneMoss

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Åsane - half-time state
21% leading43% draw36% trailing
Moss - half-time state
29% leading21% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.07
ÅsaneMoss
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.64
ÅsaneMoss
1Goals conceded (1st half)1.14
ÅsaneMoss
1.43Average goals (1st half)1.79
ÅsaneMoss
50%Clean sheet before half-time36%
ÅsaneMoss
57%No goal before half-time57%
ÅsaneMoss

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.21
ÅsaneMoss
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
ÅsaneMoss
1.14Goals conceded (2nd half)1.14
ÅsaneMoss
2.14Average goals (2nd half)2.14
ÅsaneMoss
43%Clean sheet after half-time29%
ÅsaneMoss
50%No goal after half-time36%
ÅsaneMoss

Åsane - second-half results

36% W21% R43% P
15
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Moss - second-half results

36% W14% R50% P
15
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Åsane - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Moss - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.61.2
Average goals in match2.81.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Åsane
ScoredConceded
0
7
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Moss
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
9
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
5
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Åsane

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

Moss

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

ÅsaneLigaMoss
Average goals in match 3.573.75 3.93
Both teams scored 43%60% 79%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%73% 86%
Clean sheets 21%21% 7%
Goal before half-time 71%77% 79%
Goal after half-time 86%88% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.75
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.17
Home goals / match
1.58
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Åsane 2 - 0 - 0 Moss. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Moss FK
1 : 2
Åsane Fotball
Åsane Fotball
2 : 1
Moss FK

FAQ

What was the result of Åsane vs Moss?

The First Division match finished Åsane 2:3 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Åsane and Moss?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Åsane won 2, Moss won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Åsane vs Moss?

Åsane score 1.43 goals per game on average and Moss 1.64. The First Division average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Åsane's matches and 79% of Moss's.

What form are Åsane and Moss in?

Over the last 5 games Åsane have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Moss 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Åsane vs Moss?

The statistical background for Åsane vs Moss — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.