Algeria - Ligue 1Stade Mohamed BoumezragData current as of September 12, 2026

ASO Chlef vs JS Kabylie: match statistics

ASO Chlef crest
ASO Chlef
1 : 2half-time 1:1
JS Kabylie crest
JS Kabylie

ASO Chlef vs JS Kabylie: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

ASO Chlef played against JS Kabylie in Ligue 1 (Algeria). The game was played on May 20, 2026. Venue: Stade Mohamed Boumezrag. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

ASO Chlef has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. JS Kabylie has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

ASO Chlef scores 0.89 goals per game and allows 0.96. JS Kabylie scores 1.36 and allows 1.07. Games in this league average 2.24 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 43% of ASO Chlef's games and 64% of JS Kabylie's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 43%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

JS Kabylie has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.26 per game. ASO Chlef takes 9.7 shots per game, while JS Kabylie takes 10.1.

First-half and second-half trends

ASO Chlef leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. JS Kabylie leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.79 after halftime.

When the teams score

ASO Chlef's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For JS Kabylie, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ligue 1 games average 2.24 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

ASO Chlef holds a clear home advantage driven by superior defensive metrics and quality of chances: at home they concede 0.71 goals per game and record an xG of 1.48, while JS Kabylie concedes 1.07 on the road with an xG of 1.09. The hosts average more attempts (11.79 shots and 5.36 on target per match) compared to the visitors (8.08 and 3.69), which—despite a lower conversion rate (8% vs 11%)—favors ASO due to the higher volume of opportunities. ASO wins 50% of home matches and keeps 50% clean sheets at their stadium, whereas JS wins only 21% of away games and records 21% clean sheets, further increasing the home side’s edge. Trends are mixed—both teams average 1.2 points in their last 5 matches, and JS has scored 10 goals in their last 5 fixtures versus ASO’s 5, highlighting the visitors’ offensive potential and narrowing the gap. Overall, given the hosts’ higher xG (1.48 vs 1.09), better home defense (0.71 vs 1.07) and greater shot volume, I predict an ASO Chlef victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS (Yes) scenario is more likely: ASO Chlef has a seasonal BTTS rate of 71% versus JS Kabylie's 57%, against a league average of 48%, placing both teams clearly above average. In the last 5 matches JS Kabylie recorded BTTS at 100% and ASO Chlef at 60%, with goal averages of 2.0 for JS and 1.0 for ASO and concessions of 1.4 and 1.2 respectively — both sides have recently been both scoring and conceding. xG data shows a similar picture: ASO has xG_for 1.77 and xG_against 1.26, while JS has xG_for 1.09 and xG_against 1.58 — JS’s defense allows a significant number of expected scoring opportunities (1.58). Shot statistics reinforce this signal: ASO averages 6.36 shots on target and 12.79 total shots versus JS’s 3.69 and 8.08, with conversion rates of 14% vs 11%, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering the 71% vs 57% seasonal BTTS, 100% vs 60% in the last 5, higher xG against and greater shooting activity, I assess the probability of BTTS at 70% (Yes) vs 30% (No).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG: ASO Chlef has xG_for 1.77 and the opponent’s xG_against 1.58, yielding a projected 1.68 goals for the home side; JS Kabylie has xG_for 1.09 and xG_against_home 1.26, yielding a projected 1.17 goals for the away side, total = 2.85. ASO averages 12.79 shots and 6.36 shots on target with a 14% conversion, while JSK averages 8.08 shots and 3.69 on target with an 11% conversion, so the higher shooting activity from the home team increases the likelihood of goals. Seasonal indicators support this picture: Over 1.5 occurred in 71% of ASO’s matches and 64% of JSK’s; a Poisson model at total xG=2.85 gives roughly a 78% chance of Over 1.5, about 55% for Over 2.5 and about 32% for Over 3.5. Additionally both teams have high BTTS rates: ASO 71% and JSK 57%, and the chance of a clean sheet is only 21% for each side, which further argues for Over and Both Teams To Score. On that basis the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (estimate 78%), therefore the recommended play is Over at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

ASO Chlef holds a clear offensive advantage: their goals per season average is 1.79 versus 0.93 for JS Kabylie, home xG is 1.77 versus 1.09 for the visitors, and the hosts led at the break in 50% of matches (7 occurrences) compared to just 7% for their opponents. At half-time ASO scores on average 0.79 goals, JSK 0.36; the hosts register an average of 6.36 shots on target versus 3.69 for the visitors and have a higher conversion rate (14% vs 11%), all supporting a likelihood of ASO leading after 45 minutes. In the second half ASO also dominates — they average 1.0 goal after the break, 79% of their matches feature at least one goal after half-time and they have scored 9 goals in minutes 76–90, so maintaining or extending the lead is probable. JS Kabylie draws frequently (50% of season results are draws and 86% of their matches are level at half-time), therefore an alternative scenario is draw at half-time and draw at full-time (X/X), but only 21% of away wins reduces the probability of a turnaround. In light of these figures the strongest market signal is the hosts to lead at the break and win the match (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
1Shots2
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
5Shots on target9
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
1.08xG1.41
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
3Corners3
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
90Dangerous attacks89
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
12Fouls11
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
1Cards0
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0.89Goals scored / game1.36
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0.96Goals allowed / game1.07
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
44%Average possession53%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
4.07Shots on target / game4.86
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.68Shots per game10.11
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
4.07Shots on target4.86
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
9.2%Shot conversion13.4%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
44%Possession53%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
1.26xG for1.44
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
1.44xG against1.42
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie

Shooting quality

ASO Chlef: BalancedJS Kabylie: Efficient finishing
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
Accuracy (shots on target)42%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

ASO Chlef
LWLWL
Season result split
32% W25% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-12
1.21 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-5
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
JS Kabylie
DDDLW
Season result split
36% W39% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-11-7
1.46 pts / game · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-7-4
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LWDDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JS Kabylie is 53% better for: goals scored per game.

0.89 goals / game - ASO Chlef · 1.36 goals / game - JS Kabylie

ASO Chlef is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.96 goals / game - ASO Chlef · 1.07 goals / game - JS Kabylie

ASO Chlef scoring profile: very strong

ASO Chlef scores in 71% of games (20 of 28 meczów), while JS Kabylie keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 meczów).

JS Kabylie scoring profile: strong

JS Kabylie scores in 79% of games (22 of 28 meczów), while ASO Chlef keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 meczów).

25Goals scored (season)38
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
27Goals conceded (season)30
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
1.86Average goals per game2.43
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
5Goals scored (last 5)10
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal79%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
18%2 goals32%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0%3 goals14%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0%4 goals7%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal79%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
32%2 goals29%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0%3 goals0%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0%4 goals0%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time25%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
4%BTTS in both halves4%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
18%Scored in both halves25%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
60%BTTS - last 5100%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JS Kabylie is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / game - ASO Chlef · 1.46 pts / game - JS Kabylie

ASO Chlef - half-time state
21% leading43% draw36% trailing
JS Kabylie - half-time state
29% leading61% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per game (1st half)1.46
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.57
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0.89Average goals (1st half)0.93
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
50%Clean sheet before half-time64%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
64%No goal before half-time54%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per game (2nd half)1.36
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
0.96Average goals (2nd half)1.5
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
61%Clean sheet after half-time46%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie
46%No goal after half-time43%
ASO ChlefJS Kabylie

ASO Chlef - second-half results

32% W46% D21% L
30
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

JS Kabylie - second-half results

29% W50% D21% L
41
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.46
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

ASO Chlef - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.40.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
JS Kabylie - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.40
Goals scored / game0.81.2
Goals allowed / game0.21.2
Average goals per game1.02.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

ASO Chlef
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
5
7
16-30
3
4
31-45
6
5
46-60
4
3
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

JS Kabylie
ScoredConceded
4
0
0-15
6
5
16-30
6
5
31-45
6
4
46-60
6
7
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.14
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

ASO Chlef

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

JS Kabylie

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).

Teams vs league

ASO ChlefLigaJS Kabylie
Average goals per game 1.862.24 2.43
Both teams scored 43%48% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%38% 43%
Clean sheets 36%30% 21%
Goal before half-time 71%64% 57%
Goal after half-time 71%71% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.24
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / game
0.91
Away goals / game
+46%
Home attack advantage
+32%
Home defensive advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JS KabylieGoalOualid MalkiAssist: Reda Benchaa
  2. JS KabylieSubstitutionOn: Jaredi Lopes TeixeiraOff: Zineddine Belaïd
  3. ASO ChlefSubstitutionOn: Djamel BelalemOff: Ismael Mahamadou Moussa
  4. ASO ChlefYellow cardAbdelhak Debbari
  5. JS KabylieGoalLahlou AkhribAssist: Mostapha Bott
  6. JS KabylieSubstitutionOn: Josaphat Arthur BadaOff: Billel Messaoudi
  7. JS KabylieSubstitutionOn: Fares Nechat DjabriOff: Mohamed Reda Hamidi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from ASO Chlef's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against JS Kabylie. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

JS Kabylie
2 : 1
ASO Chlef

FAQ

What was the result of ASO Chlef vs JS Kabylie?

The Ligue 1 match finished ASO Chlef 1:2 JS Kabylie. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before ASO Chlef vs JS Kabylie?

ASO Chlef score 0.89 goals per game on average and JS Kabylie 1.36. The Ligue 1 average is 2.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 43% of ASO Chlef's matches and 64% of JS Kabylie's.

What form are ASO Chlef and JS Kabylie in?

Over the last 5 games ASO Chlef have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and JS Kabylie 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ASO Chlef vs JS Kabylie?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.