Kazakhstan - Kazakhstan Premier LeagueData current as of September 07, 2026

Astana vs Kyzyl-Zhar: match statistics

Astana crest
Astana
2 : 1half-time 0:0
Kyzyl-Zhar crest
Kyzyl-Zhar

Astana vs Kyzyl-Zhar: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Astana played against Kyzyl-Zhar in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The game was played on May 9, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Astana has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Kyzyl-Zhar has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Astana scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.25. Kyzyl-Zhar scores 1.25 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 2.07 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Astana's games and 38% of Kyzyl-Zhar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 34% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Astana has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.12 per game. Astana takes 14.6 shots per game, while Kyzyl-Zhar takes 9.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Astana leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Kyzyl-Zhar leads at halftime in 13% and scores 1.13 after halftime.

When the teams score

Astana's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Kyzyl-Zhar, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Kazakhstan Premier League games average 2.07 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 34% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Astana is the favorite: at home they average 2.25 goals per game, register 7 shots on target and have 59% possession. At home they are unbeaten (0% defeats), have won 75% of matches and boast a +6 goal differential. Kyzyl-Zhar score only 0.33 goals on average away, average 2 shots on target per game, have a shot accuracy rate of 3% and failed to score in 67% of away matches, indicating serious finishing issues. The visitors’ defense away, however, is compact: Kyzyl-Zhar concede only 0.33 goals on average and keep 67% clean sheets, with an average xG against of 1.06, which suggests they can limit actual damage despite chances created. In the last 5 matches the hosts average 1 point per game (form ddwll), while the visitors average 1.8 points per game and have 3 wins in 5 (wwlwl), yet the visitors’ better form does not translate into away efficiency. Considering Astana’s superiority in quality and volume of chances (xG 1.77 and 7 shots on target at home versus the visitors’ xG against 1.06 and 2 shots on target away) and the high percentage of matches where Kyzyl-Zhar fail to score (67%), I tip the home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I lean toward a BTTS - Yes scenario: 70% Yes, 30% No. Astana has a season BTTS rate of 60% and 80% in the last 5 matches, with goals scored 1.8 on the season and 1.2 in the last 5, while conceding 1.2 on the season and 1.4 in the last 5. Kyzyl-Zhar has a season clean sheet rate of 67% and a season goals average of 0.33, but in the last 5 matches they scored 8 goals (1.6 avg.) and conceded 4 goals (0.8 avg.), showing scoring potential in form. xG suggests similar chance creation: xG_for 1.17 (Astana) vs 1.04 (Kyzyl-Zhar) and xG_against 1.33 vs 1.06, and additionally Astana averages 4.4 shots on target vs 2.0 for the opponents and has a conversion rate of 19% vs 3%, which increases the probability that both sides will find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG and form, I expect around 1.35 goals for Astana (xG_for season 1.17, xG_for last 5 = 1.56) and 0.95 goals for Kyzyl-Zhar (xG_for season 1.04, xG_for last 5 = 1.01), totaling 2.30 expected goals. Astana averages 1.8 goals per game this season, registers 4.4 shots on target with a 19% conversion rate, while Kyzyl-Zhar has season figures of 0.33 goals per game, 2.0 shots on target and a 3% conversion, so most goals should come from the home side. Data show a divergence: Astana home matches finished Over 2.5 goals in 80% of cases, but Kyzyl-Zhar away games had 0% Over 2.5, therefore signals point to a confident Over 1.5 but a less convincing Over 2.5. After weighing these indicators the model gives about a 67% chance of Over 1.5, about 40% for Over 2.5 and about 20% for Over 3.5, so I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1): Astana scores an average of 0.2 goals by half-time while Kyzyl‑Zhar averages 0.0, which favors a draw in the first 45 minutes. After the break however the hosts significantly accelerate — they score an average of 1.6 goals in the second half and in 100% of their matches so far they have had at least 0.5 goals after the break, so they are most often the side to produce the turnaround. Additionally Astana has an xG of 1.17 versus 1.04 for their opponents and 4.4 shots on target per game compared to 2.0 for the visitors, and the higher conversion rate (19% vs 3%) means that with similar xG the hosts more frequently convert chances into goals. Even so Kyzyl‑Zhar keep a lot of clean sheets (67% of matches without conceding this season), which justifies a relatively high chance of a full-time draw (I gave 22% to X/X) and a small probability that the visitors win after a half-time draw (X/2 only 2%). Therefore the most correct HT/FT pick is X/1, with 1/1 (10%) and 2/1 (7%) treated as secondary scenarios due to the rarity of the hosts leading at half-time (20%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

58Possession (%)42
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
13Shots9
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
6Shots on target5
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1.51xG1.16
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
5Corners6
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
37Dangerous attacks34
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
9Fouls10
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1Cards4
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.38Goals scored / game1.25
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1.25Goals allowed / game0.88
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
60%Average possession47%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
6Shots on target / game3.5
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.63Shots per game9.75
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
6Shots on target3.5
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
9.4%Shot conversion12.8%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
60%Possession47%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1.67xG for1.12
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1.21xG against1.23
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

Shooting quality

Astana: DominantKyzyl-Zhar: Counter-attacking
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
Accuracy (shots on target)41%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kyzyl-Zhar is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Astana · 1.4 pts / game - Kyzyl-Zhar

Astana
LDDWL
Season result split
38% W38% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-2
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Kyzyl-Zhar
DWWLL
Season result split
38% W25% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-3
1.38 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
LDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.83Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Astana is 10% better for: goals scored per game.

1.38 goals / game - Astana · 1.25 goals / game - Kyzyl-Zhar

Kyzyl-Zhar is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - Astana · 0.88 goals / game - Kyzyl-Zhar

Astana scoring profile: strong

Astana scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 meczów), while Kyzyl-Zhar keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 meczów).

Kyzyl-Zhar scoring profile: strong

Kyzyl-Zhar scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 meczów), while Astana keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 meczów).

11Goals scored (season)10
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
10Goals conceded (season)7
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
2.63Average goals per game2.13
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
5Goals scored (last 5)6
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
9Goals conceded (last 5)3
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal63%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
50%2 goals38%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
13%3 goals13%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
13%4 goals13%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal63%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
25%2 goals25%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
13%3 goals0%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
13%4 goals0%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time0%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
38%Scored in both halves13%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
60%BTTS - last 520%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
38%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Astana is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Astana · 0.88 pts / game - Kyzyl-Zhar

Astana - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing
Kyzyl-Zhar - half-time state
13% leading50% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)0.88
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.13
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1.63Average goals (1st half)0.5
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
75%Clean sheet before half-time63%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
50%No goal before half-time88%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per game (2nd half)1.63
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
1Average goals (2nd half)1.63
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
50%Clean sheet after half-time63%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar
50%No goal after half-time38%
AstanaKyzyl-Zhar

Astana - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
12
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Kyzyl-Zhar - second-half results

38% W50% R13% P
7
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding292%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Astana - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game1.20.6
Average goals per game1.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Kyzyl-Zhar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.41.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Astana
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Kyzyl-Zhar
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.38
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+68%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Astana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

Kyzyl-Zhar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
147%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).

Teams vs league

AstanaLigaKyzyl-Zhar
Average goals per game 2.632.07 2.13
Both teams scored 50%49% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%34% 50%
Clean sheets 25%32% 38%
Goal before half-time 63%60% 50%
Goal after half-time 75%68% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.07
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.22
Home goals / game
0.85
Away goals / game
+44%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kyzyl-ZharYellow cardArtem Cheredinov
  2. Kyzyl-ZharYellow cardAslan Adil
  3. Kyzyl-ZharSubstitutionOn: Plamen GalabovOff: Artem Cheredinov
  4. Kyzyl-ZharGoalYuriy PertsukhAssist: Aslan Adil
  5. AstanaGoalYan Vorogovskiy
  6. Kyzyl-ZharSubstitutionOn: Roman ChirkovOff: Plamen Galabov
  7. AstanaYellow cardKarlo Bartolec
  8. Kyzyl-ZharSubstitutionOn: Stéphane Cédric BahokenOff: Evgeny Makarenko
  9. AstanaSubstitutionOn: Nurali ZhaksylykovOff: Marin Tomasov
  10. Kyzyl-ZharYellow cardEtienne Yves Beugré
  11. Kyzyl-ZharYellow cardEtienne Yves Beugré
  12. AstanaSubstitutionOn: Stanislav BasmanovOff: Maksat Abraev

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Astana's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Kyzyl-Zhar. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FK Astana
3 : 3
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk
0 : 2
FK Astana

FAQ

What was the result of Astana vs Kyzyl-Zhar?

The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Astana 2:1 Kyzyl-Zhar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Astana and Kyzyl-Zhar?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Astana won 1, Kyzyl-Zhar won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Astana vs Kyzyl-Zhar?

Astana score 1.38 goals per game on average and Kyzyl-Zhar 1.25. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Astana's matches and 38% of Kyzyl-Zhar's.

What form are Astana and Kyzyl-Zhar in?

Over the last 5 games Astana have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Kyzyl-Zhar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Astana vs Kyzyl-Zhar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.