Astana vs Ulytau: match statistics
Astana vs Ulytau: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Astana play Ulytau in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match date is 22 May 2026 at 14:00. Venue: Astana Arena. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Astana: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Ulytau: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Astana scores 1.47 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Ulytau scores 0.83 and concedes 0.89. League average: 2.27 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Astana 47%, Ulytau 44%. Over 2.5: Astana 47%, Ulytau 28%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 41%.
xG, shots and style
Astana has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.28. Astana: 15.5 shots per match, Ulytau: 11.0.
Match halves
Astana: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.71. Ulytau: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
Astana: 46-60 (7 goals). Ulytau: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 41%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Astana is the clear favorite based on home metrics: they win 80% of home matches and in their last five games at home they have a run (WWDWW) — 4 wins and 1 draw, averaging 2.2 goals per game (13 goals this season). In attack at home they create on average 6.8 shots on target and 14.4 shots per game with a conversion rate of 15%, and their average home xG is 1.72 versus 1.37 xG for guests on the road. Ulytau score only 0.75 goals per away game, register on average 3 shots on target and have 50% of games without a goal; in the last 5 matches the visitors conceded 7 goals, while Astana conceded 6. Defensively the hosts concede 0.8 goals at home versus 1.25 conceded by Ulytau away, so given the superiority in chance quality and efficiency I predict an Astana win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Astana | Ulytau | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Astana is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Astana · 1 pts / match - Ulytau
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Astana is 77% better for: goals scored per match.
1.47 goals / match - Astana · 0.83 goals / match - Ulytau
Ulytau is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.12 goals / match - Astana · 0.89 goals / match - Ulytau
Astana scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Ulytau keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).
Ulytau scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Astana keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Astana
Over / Under — Ulytau
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Astana is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.59 pts / match - Astana · 1.22 pts / match - Ulytau
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Astana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ulytau - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Astana
Ulytau
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Astana | Liga | Ulytau | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.59 | 2.27 | ▼ 1.72 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 51% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 41% | ▼ 28% |
| Clean sheets | • 29% | 30% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 62% | • 61% |
| Goal after half-time | • 71% | 70% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Astana 2 - 0 - 0 Ulytau. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Astana vs Ulytau?
The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Astana 3:0 Ulytau. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Astana and Ulytau?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Astana won 2, Ulytau won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Astana vs Ulytau?
Astana score 1.47 goals per game on average and Ulytau 0.83. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Astana's matches and 44% of Ulytau's.
What form are Astana and Ulytau in?
Over the last 5 games Astana have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Ulytau 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Astana vs Ulytau?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.