Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of September 13, 2026

Aswan FC vs Tersana: match statistics

Aswan FC crest
Aswan FC
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Tersana crest
Tersana
130%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
230%(0.00)

Aswan FC is showing very poor form, with just one point in the last five matches and a disastrous record at home (18% wins, 64% of matches without scoring a goal). Tersana also isn't shining on the road, but has significantly better recent form (3 points in 5 matches) and an impressive 50% clean sheets away. A key factor is the defensive solidity of the visitors (averaging 0.8 goals conceded away) and their propensity for draws (50% of away matches). Aswan has huge issues with efficiency (averaging 0.45 goals at home), which, given Tersana's defensive approach, indicates a low probability of many goals. Considering the offensive weakness of both teams and Tersana's tendency to draw away from home, the most likely scenario is a goalless or low-scoring draw.

Aswan FC vs Tersana: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Aswan FC played against Tersana in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on February 12, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Aswan FC has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Tersana has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Aswan FC scores 0.36 goals per game and allows 0.86. Tersana scores 0.73 and allows 0.77. Games in this league average 1.88 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 14% of Aswan FC's games and 27% of Tersana's. The Over 2.5 rates are 18% and 18%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 30% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Tersana has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 0.97 per game. Aswan FC takes 5.8 shots per game, while Tersana takes 8.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Aswan FC leads at halftime in 9% of its games and scores 0.18 goals per game after halftime. Tersana leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.32 after halftime.

When the teams score

Aswan FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Tersana, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 1.88 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 30% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Aswan FC is showing very poor form, with just one point in the last five matches and a disastrous record at home (18% wins, 64% of matches without scoring a goal). Tersana also isn't shining on the road, but has significantly better recent form (3 points in 5 matches) and an impressive 50% clean sheets away. A key factor is the defensive solidity of the visitors (averaging 0.8 goals conceded away) and their propensity for draws (50% of away matches). Aswan has huge issues with efficiency (averaging 0.45 goals at home), which, given Tersana's defensive approach, indicates a low probability of many goals. Considering the offensive weakness of both teams and Tersana's tendency to draw away from home, the most likely scenario is a goalless or low-scoring draw.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

34Possession (%)66
Aswan FCTersana
8Shots11
Aswan FCTersana
2Shots on target4
Aswan FCTersana
0.83xG1.45
Aswan FCTersana
1Corners10
Aswan FCTersana
26Dangerous attacks67
Aswan FCTersana
9Fouls12
Aswan FCTersana
0Cards0
Aswan FCTersana

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.36Goals scored / game0.73
Aswan FCTersana
0.86Goals allowed / game0.77
Aswan FCTersana
40%Average possession42%
Aswan FCTersana
2Shots on target / game3.32
Aswan FCTersana

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

5.82Shots per game8.23
Aswan FCTersana
2Shots on target3.32
Aswan FCTersana
6.3%Shot conversion8.8%
Aswan FCTersana
40%Possession42%
Aswan FCTersana
0.97xG for1.29
Aswan FCTersana
1.21xG against1.07
Aswan FCTersana

Shooting quality

Aswan FC: BalancedTersana: Balanced
Aswan FCTersana
Accuracy (shots on target)34%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.180.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Tersana is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / game - Aswan FC · 1 pts / game - Tersana

Aswan FC
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
18% W32% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-11
0.86 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Tersana
LWLDD
Season result split
27% W41% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-7
1.23 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tersana is 103% better for: goals scored per game.

0.36 goals / game - Aswan FC · 0.73 goals / game - Tersana

Tersana is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.86 goals / game - Aswan FC · 0.77 goals / game - Tersana

Aswan FC scoring profile: more difficult

Aswan FC scores in 32% of games (7 of 22 meczów), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 meczów).

Tersana scoring profile: mixed

Tersana scores in 45% of games (10 of 22 meczów), while Aswan FC keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 meczów).

8Goals scored (season)16
Aswan FCTersana
19Goals conceded (season)17
Aswan FCTersana
1.23Average goals per game1.5
Aswan FCTersana
1Goals scored (last 5)3
Aswan FCTersana
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
Aswan FCTersana

How often they score at least...

32%1 goal45%
Aswan FCTersana
5%2 goals14%
Aswan FCTersana
0%3 goals9%
Aswan FCTersana
0%4 goals5%
Aswan FCTersana

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal55%
Aswan FCTersana
23%2 goals14%
Aswan FCTersana
9%3 goals5%
Aswan FCTersana
0%4 goals5%
Aswan FCTersana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time14%
Aswan FCTersana
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Aswan FCTersana
0%Scored in both halves14%
Aswan FCTersana

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
Aswan FCTersana
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Aswan FCTersana
20%BTTS - last 520%
Aswan FCTersana

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

41%Min. 1 goal before half-time36%
Aswan FCTersana
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Aswan FCTersana
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Aswan FCTersana

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time59%
Aswan FCTersana
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Aswan FCTersana
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Aswan FCTersana

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tersana is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.91 pts / game - Aswan FC · 1.32 pts / game - Tersana

Aswan FC - half-time state
9% leading64% draw27% trailing
Tersana - half-time state
18% leading77% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.91Points per game (1st half)1.32
Aswan FCTersana
0.18Goals scored (1st half)0.41
Aswan FCTersana
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
Aswan FCTersana
0.55Average goals (1st half)0.68
Aswan FCTersana
68%Clean sheet before half-time82%
Aswan FCTersana
82%No goal before half-time68%
Aswan FCTersana

After half-time (2nd half)

0.91Points per game (2nd half)1.05
Aswan FCTersana
0.18Goals scored (2nd half)0.32
Aswan FCTersana
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Aswan FCTersana
0.68Average goals (2nd half)0.82
Aswan FCTersana
59%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Aswan FCTersana
86%No goal after half-time73%
Aswan FCTersana

Aswan FC - second-half results

14% W50% D36% L
20
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Tersana - second-half results

18% W50% D32% L
29
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Aswan FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.400.60
Goals scored / game0.20.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.00.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Tersana - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.60.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Aswan FC
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Tersana
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
2
3
46-60
0
3
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.36
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.6 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
72%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
21%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
14%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
37%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Aswan FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
38%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Tersana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 38% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Aswan FCLigaTersana
Average goals per game 1.231.88 1.50
Both teams scored 14%40% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 18%30% 18%
Clean sheets 45%38% 45%
Goal before half-time 41%51% 36%
Goal after half-time 50%68% 59%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.88
Average goals per game
40%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
0.95
Home goals / game
0.93
Away goals / game
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defensive advantage
+-1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Aswan FC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Tersana. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Tersana
1 : 0
Aswan FC

FAQ

What was the result of Aswan FC vs Tersana?

The Second Division match finished Aswan FC 1:1 Tersana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Aswan FC vs Tersana?

Aswan FC score 0.36 goals per game on average and Tersana 0.73. The Second Division average is 1.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 14% of Aswan FC's matches and 27% of Tersana's.

What form are Aswan FC and Tersana in?

Over the last 5 games Aswan FC have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Tersana 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aswan FC vs Tersana?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.