Italy - Serie C Group CData current as of September 12, 2026

Atalanta II vs Audace Cerignola: match statistics

Atalanta II crest
Atalanta II
3 : 2half-time 2:0
Audace Cerignola crest
Audace Cerignola
135%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
230%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams. Atalanta II shows solid form in their last five matches (2-3-0), remaining unbeaten and earning 1.8 points per match. The hosts hold the advantage in possession (53%) and have a higher xG at home (1.65 vs 1.31), suggesting more effective chance creation. However, Audace Cerignola boasts a better away record, with 40% wins and an impressive 33% clean sheets on the road. The visitors have slightly weaker recent form (1.4 PPG), but their away defense (averaging 1.2 goals conceded) is more solid than the hosts' attack suggests. Considering Atalanta II's high draw percentage at home (29%) and the tendency of both teams towards tight matches, a draw appears to be the most likely result.

Atalanta II vs Audace Cerignola: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Atalanta II played against Audace Cerignola in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on March 9, 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Recent form

Atalanta II has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Audace Cerignola has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Atalanta II scores 1.37 goals per game and allows 1.23. Audace Cerignola scores 1.27 and allows 1.27. Games in this league average 2.47 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Atalanta II's games and 47% of Audace Cerignola's. The Over 2.5 rates are 37% and 50%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Atalanta II has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.48 per game. Atalanta II takes 12.9 shots per game, while Audace Cerignola takes 12.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Atalanta II leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. Audace Cerignola leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.73 after halftime.

When the teams score

Atalanta II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (10 goals). For Audace Cerignola, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Serie C Group C games average 2.47 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams. Atalanta II shows solid form in their last five matches (2-3-0), remaining unbeaten and earning 1.8 points per match. The hosts hold the advantage in possession (53%) and have a higher xG at home (1.65 vs 1.31), suggesting more effective chance creation. However, Audace Cerignola boasts a better away record, with 40% wins and an impressive 33% clean sheets on the road. The visitors have slightly weaker recent form (1.4 PPG), but their away defense (averaging 1.2 goals conceded) is more solid than the hosts' attack suggests. Considering Atalanta II's high draw percentage at home (29%) and the tendency of both teams towards tight matches, a draw appears to be the most likely result.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
11Shots11
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
5Shots on target7
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
1.2xG1.44
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
5Corners4
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
21Dangerous attacks34
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
10Fouls10
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
2Cards1
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
1.37Goals scored / game1.27
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
1.23Goals allowed / game1.27
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
54%Average possession48%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
4.83Shots on target / game4.5
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.87Shots per game12.6
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
4.83Shots on target4.5
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
10.6%Shot conversion10.1%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
54%Possession48%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
1.56xG for1.48
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
1.4xG against1.32
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola

Shooting quality

Atalanta II: BalancedAudace Cerignola: Balanced
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
Accuracy (shots on target)38%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Atalanta II is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Atalanta II · 1.4 pts / game - Audace Cerignola

Atalanta II
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
30% W27% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-13
1.17 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-6
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Audace Cerignola
DLWLW
Season result split
40% W30% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-9
1.50 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Atalanta II is 8% better for: goals scored per game.

1.37 goals / game - Atalanta II · 1.27 goals / game - Audace Cerignola

Atalanta II scoring profile: strong

Atalanta II scores in 63% of games (19 of 30 meczów), while Audace Cerignola keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 meczów).

Audace Cerignola scoring profile: very strong

Audace Cerignola scores in 67% of games (20 of 30 meczów), while Atalanta II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 meczów).

41Goals scored (season)38
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
37Goals conceded (season)38
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
2.6Average goals per game2.53
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
6Goals scored (last 5)6
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal67%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
33%2 goals37%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
17%3 goals17%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
10%4 goals7%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal63%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
37%2 goals40%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
3%3 goals17%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
3%4 goals7%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

47%
Audace Cerignola - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 30 meczów
48%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time23%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
7%BTTS in both halves7%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
23%Scored in both halves27%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
40%BTTS - last 540%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Atalanta II is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / game - Atalanta II · 1.23 pts / game - Audace Cerignola

Atalanta II - half-time state
30% leading50% draw20% trailing
Audace Cerignola - half-time state
23% leading53% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per game (1st half)1.23
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.07
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
60%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
57%No goal before half-time57%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per game (2nd half)1.37
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.47
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
40%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola
57%No goal after half-time50%
Atalanta IIAudace Cerignola

Atalanta II - second-half results

23% W33% D43% L
42
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Audace Cerignola - second-half results

33% W37% D30% L
37
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Atalanta II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.00
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.61.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Audace Cerignola - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Atalanta II
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
10
6
16-30
7
4
31-45
4
10
46-60
8
9
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Audace Cerignola
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
4
6
16-30
7
6
31-45
8
5
46-60
4
7
61-75
10
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.57
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+134%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Atalanta II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Audace Cerignola

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).

Teams vs league

Atalanta IILigaAudace Cerignola
Average goals per game 2.602.47 2.53
Both teams scored 50%48% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%46% 50%
Clean sheets 20%30% 37%
Goal before half-time 63%66% 60%
Goal after half-time 77%79% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / game
1.02
Away goals / game
+42%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Atalanta IIGoalSergej Levak
  2. Atalanta IIGoalAlessandro Cortinovis
  3. Atalanta IIYellow cardGiulio Misitano
  4. Audace CerignolaGoalGaetano Vitale
  5. Audace CerignolaGoalClaudio Parlato
  6. Audace CerignolaSubstitutionOn: Zak RuggieroOff: Ludovico D'Orazio
  7. Atalanta IISubstitutionOn: Andrea BonanomiOff: Alessandro Cortinovis
  8. Audace CerignolaYellow cardLorenzo Paolucci
  9. Audace CerignolaGoalAndrea Gasbarro
  10. Atalanta IIYellow cardSergej Levak

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Atalanta II's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Audace Cerignola. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Audace Cerignola
2 : 4
Atalanta II

FAQ

What was the result of Atalanta II vs Audace Cerignola?

The Serie C Group C match finished Atalanta II 3:2 Audace Cerignola. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Atalanta II vs Audace Cerignola?

Atalanta II score 1.37 goals per game on average and Audace Cerignola 1.27. The Serie C Group C average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Atalanta II's matches and 47% of Audace Cerignola's.

What form are Atalanta II and Audace Cerignola in?

Over the last 5 games Atalanta II have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Audace Cerignola 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Atalanta II vs Audace Cerignola?

The statistical background for Atalanta II vs Audace Cerignola — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.