United States - USL League OneData current as of 23 July 2026

Athletic Club Boise vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics

Athletic Club Boise vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Athletic Club Boise play Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match date is 3 May 2026 at 03:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Athletic Club Boise: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Athletic Club Boise scores 1.47 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.93 and concedes 1.21. League average: 2.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Athletic Club Boise 59%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 57%. Over 2.5: Athletic Club Boise 59%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 64%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Athletic Club Boise has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.52. Athletic Club Boise: 13.7 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 12.5.

Match halves

Athletic Club Boise: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.88. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.07.

Goals by minute

Athletic Club Boise: 76-90+ (6 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

The favorite is Athletic Club Boise: the hosts dominate possession (60% vs 28%) and create more shots (avg. 13.5 shots and 5.5 on target at home vs 10 shots and 3.5 on target for Chattanooga away), giving them greater match control. Offensively Boise averages 2.5 goals per home game with xG 1.64, while visitors average 2.0 goals away with xG 1.18, so the hosts generate noticeably more high-quality chances despite similar conversion (19% vs 20%). Defensively the hosts’ advantage is even clearer — they concede 0.5 goals per home game on average with 50% of matches keeping a clean sheet, whereas Chattanooga concedes 1.5 goals away and has zero clean sheets. Form also favors Boise: 1.2 points on average in the last 5 matches vs 0.8 for the visitors, and the hosts’ last five results are lddwd compared to Chattanooga’s wldll, indicating a weaker run for the visitors. Considering the possession edge, higher xG (1.64 vs 1.18), better shots-on-target stats (5.5 vs 3.5) and lower average goals conceded (0.5 vs 1.5), I estimate probabilities of 70% for a home win, 20% for a draw and 10% for an away win.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
13Shots12
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
3Shots on target4
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
1.64xG1.42
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
7Corners5
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
84Dangerous attacks53
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
11Fouls18
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
0Cards2
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
1.47Goals scored / match1.93
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
1.41Goals conceded / match1.21
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
55%Average possession38%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
4.24Shots on target / match4.64
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.65Shots per match12.5
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
4.24Shots on target4.64
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
10.8%Shot conversion15.4%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
55%Possession38%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
1.6xG for1.52
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
1.39xG against1.56
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

Shooting quality

Athletic Club Boise: BalancedChattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attacking
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
Accuracy (shots on target)31%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Athletic Club Boise · 2.4 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Athletic Club Boise
LWLWW
Season result split
47% W18% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-6
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Chattanooga Red Wolves
WWLWW
Season result split
57% W7% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-1-5
1.79 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.47 goals / match - Athletic Club Boise · 1.93 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.41 goals / match - Athletic Club Boise · 1.21 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Athletic Club Boise scoring profile: very strong

Athletic Club Boise scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Athletic Club Boise keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

25Goals scored (season)27
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
24Goals conceded (season)17
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
2.88Average goals in match3.14
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
6Goals scored (last 5)9
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal86%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
47%2 goals57%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
6%3 goals21%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
6%4 goals21%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
41%2 goals43%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
18%3 goals7%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
6%4 goals0%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
Athletic Club Boise - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 17 matches
57%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 14 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time36%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
12%BTTS in both halves0%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
24%Scored in both halves29%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
60%BTTS - last 540%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Athletic Club Boise · 1.5 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Athletic Club Boise - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing
Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
36% leading43% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.5
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.86
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
1Average goals (1st half)1.57
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
59%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
59%No goal before half-time43%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per match (2nd half)1.71
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)1.07
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.57
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
35%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves
29%No goal after half-time43%
Athletic Club BoiseChattanooga Red Wolves

Athletic Club Boise - second-half results

47% W6% R47% P
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding196%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

50% W21% R29% P
21
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding158%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Athletic Club Boise - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.62.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Athletic Club Boise
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
2
2
31-45
4
6
46-60
5
4
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
5
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
7
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.01
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Athletic Club Boise

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
172%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Athletic Club BoiseLigaChattanooga Red Wolves
Average goals in match 2.882.85 3.14
Both teams scored 59%55% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%59% 64%
Clean sheets 29%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 65%73% 79%
Goal after half-time 100%80% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Athletic Club Boise vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

The USL League One match finished Athletic Club Boise 2:1 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Athletic Club Boise vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

Athletic Club Boise score 1.47 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.93. The USL League One average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Athletic Club Boise's matches and 57% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.

What form are Athletic Club Boise and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?

Over the last 5 games Athletic Club Boise have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Athletic Club Boise vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

The statistical background for Athletic Club Boise vs Chattanooga Red Wolves — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.