Athletic Club Boise vs NY Cosmos: match statistics
Athletic Club Boise vs NY Cosmos: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Athletic Club Boise played against NY Cosmos in USL League One (United States). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Athletic Club Boise has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. NY Cosmos has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Athletic Club Boise scores 1.58 goals per game and allows 1.38. NY Cosmos scores 1.25 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.94 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Athletic Club Boise's games and 63% of NY Cosmos's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 71%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Athletic Club Boise has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.57 per game. Athletic Club Boise takes 13.9 shots per game, while NY Cosmos takes 12.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Athletic Club Boise leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. NY Cosmos leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.88 after halftime.
When the teams score
Athletic Club Boise's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For NY Cosmos, it is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL League One games average 2.94 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Athletic Club Boise sit in 5th place, while NY Cosmos are only 16th, and the hosts’ overall season record (12 wins and 7 losses) clearly surpasses that of the visitors, who have lost 14 of their 24 matches. Boise are unbeaten in their last five games, collecting 11 points and conceding just 5 goals during that run, whereas Cosmos have allowed opponents to score 8 times. At home, the hosts win 58% of their matches, score an average of 1.50 goals and create chances worth 1.79 xG, while allowing just 1.14 xG at their own end. The New Yorkers’ biggest issue is their away defensive record: they concede an average of 2.46 goals per match, lose 69% of such fixtures and have kept a clean sheet in only 8% of them. The visitors have recently improved their finishing, scoring 11 goals in their last five appearances, but Boise’s edge in possession (58% to 49%), shots on target (4.75 to 3.85) and chance quality points to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is clear, as BTTS - Yes occurred in 55% of Athletic Club Boise’s matches this season and as many as 69% of NY Cosmos’ matches, compared with the league average of 59%. Over the last five matches, these figures rose to 60% for the hosts and 80% for the visitors, while the teams averaged 1.8 and 2.2 goals respectively. Cosmos have had a very weak defense over the course of the season, conceding 2.46 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in only 8% of their appearances, which strongly supports a goal for the hosts. Boise also create solid chances, averaging 1.67 xG and 5.27 shots on target per match, while the visitors generated 1.81 xG across their last five fixtures. Athletic Club Boise have kept a clean sheet in 36% of their matches, but Cosmos’ current attacking efficiency and their 2.2 goals per match in the recent run make a goal for the visitors more likely than a No Goal outcome for either side.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Athletic Club Boise averages 1.67 xG per match, while NY Cosmos allows as much as 1.76 xG and concedes an average of 2.46 goals, clearly favoring goals for the home side. Cosmos also has solid offensive potential: it scores an average of 1.31 goals and generates 1.48 xG, while Boise allows opponents 1.42 xG. At least 2 goals were scored in 73% of Boise’s matches and in all of Cosmos’ games, while over their last five appearances the teams scored 1.8 and 2.2 goals per match, respectively. The Over 1.5 goals line therefore has the strongest support from both seasonal trends and current form, with a projected total of 3.15 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is Athletic Club Boise leading at the break and the home side winning, as NY Cosmos concede an average of as many as 1.31 goals before half-time, while Boise allow opponents just 0.45 goals in this phase of the match. The visitors were trailing at half-time in 62% of their matches, while the hosts have a higher season-long xG, 1.67 compared with 1.48, and average 5.27 shots on target per match versus Cosmos’ 3.85. Boise’s advantage is even more pronounced in full-time results: they win 36% of their matches, whereas Cosmos win only 15% and lose as many as 69%. Recent form also supports the hosts, who have averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.0 conceded across their last five appearances and remain unbeaten, while the Cosmos defense has conceded an average of 1.6 goals.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Athletic Club Boise | NY Cosmos | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Athletic Club Boise is 38% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Athletic Club Boise · 1.6 pts / game - NY Cosmos
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Athletic Club Boise is 26% better for: goals scored per game.
1.58 goals / game - Athletic Club Boise · 1.25 goals / game - NY Cosmos
Athletic Club Boise is 45% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.38 goals / game - Athletic Club Boise · 2 goals / game - NY Cosmos
Athletic Club Boise scores in 88% of games (21 of 24 games), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 games).
NY Cosmos scores in 79% of games (19 of 24 games), while Athletic Club Boise keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Athletic Club Boise
Over / Under - NY Cosmos
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Athletic Club Boise is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / game - Athletic Club Boise · 0.83 pts / game - NY Cosmos
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Athletic Club Boise - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
NY Cosmos - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Athletic Club Boise
NY Cosmos
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Athletic Club Boise | Liga | NY Cosmos | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.96 | 2.94 | ▲ 3.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 59% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 59% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 24% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 96% | 81% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Athletic Club Boise's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against NY Cosmos. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Athletic Club Boise vs NY Cosmos?
The USL League One match finished Athletic Club Boise 2:1 NY Cosmos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Athletic Club Boise vs NY Cosmos?
Athletic Club Boise score 1.58 goals per game on average and NY Cosmos 1.25. The USL League One average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Athletic Club Boise's matches and 63% of NY Cosmos's.
What form are Athletic Club Boise and NY Cosmos in?
Over the last 5 games Athletic Club Boise have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and NY Cosmos 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Athletic Club Boise vs NY Cosmos?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


