Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II: match statistics
Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Atlanta United II played against Chicago Fire II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on August 18, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Atlanta United II has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Chicago Fire II has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Atlanta United II scores 2.05 goals per game and allows 1.64. Chicago Fire II scores 2.00 and allows 1.59. Games in this league average 3.27 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of Atlanta United II's games and 68% of Chicago Fire II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 82%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Atlanta United II has the higher season xG average, 1.88 to 1.60 per game. Atlanta United II takes 16.3 shots per game, while Chicago Fire II takes 13.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Atlanta United II leads at halftime in 45% of its games and scores 1.23 goals per game after halftime. Chicago Fire II leads at halftime in 45% and scores 0.86 after halftime.
When the teams score
Atlanta United II's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Chicago Fire II, it is minutes 31-45+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS Next Pro games average 3.27 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Atlanta United II have a clear home advantage: they win 60% of their home matches and average 2.7 goals scored there, while Chicago Fire II win only 18% of their away games. The hosts create more high-quality chances, recording an average xG of 1.95 compared with Chicago’s 1.43, while also registering 17.4 shots and 6.4 on target per match, compared with 12.09 and 4.64 for the visitors. Neither defense is particularly solid, with Atlanta conceding 1.7 goals per home game and Chicago 1.73 away from home, which supports the prospect of both teams scoring. The visitors are in good recent form, having scored 19 goals in their last five matches and won three of them, but their away record and 45% loss rate on the road favor the hosts. Atlanta should be able to capitalise on their greater attacking intensity and superior chance quality, although Chicago’s scoring form reduces confidence in this selection.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is clear, as Chicago Fire II had both teams score in 82% of their matches this season, compared with 60% for Atlanta United II. The visitors kept a clean sheet in only 9% of their games and concede an average of 1.73 goals, while Atlanta score as many as 2.5 goals per home match. Chicago are currently highly effective in attack: they have scored 19 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 3.8, while Atlanta conceded 1.8 goals over the same period. Both sides also create a solid number of chances, with an average xG of 1.80 for the hosts and 1.43 for the visitors, alongside xGA of 1.43 and 1.55 respectively. The high rates of matches featuring at least three goals—90% for Atlanta and 82% for Chicago—further support an open game in which both teams should find the back of the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Atlanta United II score an average of 2.5 goals per game, while Chicago Fire II concede 1.73, clearly supporting the hosts’ high-scoring potential. The visitors are equally offensive in their current form: they have scored 19 goals in their last five matches, averaging 3.8 per game, with an average xG of 1.93. The 1.5-goal line was surpassed in 90% of Atlanta’s matches and 91% of Chicago’s, while both teams average 14.1 and 12.09 shots, respectively. An additional argument is Chicago’s very low clean-sheet rate, at just 9%, making Over 1.5 the strongest and safest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Atlanta United II were leading at half-time in 6 of their 10 matches, compared with just 3 of Chicago Fire II’s 11, while the hosts average 1.50 goals before the break against 0.82 for their opponents. Atlanta’s advantage over the full season is also clear: they win 60% of their matches and average 2.50 goals, compared with Chicago’s 18% win rate and 1.55 goals per game. The hosts also create better chances, as reflected by an average xG of 1.80 versus 1.43 and a shot conversion rate of 18% compared with the visitors’ 13%. However, Chicago are in excellent recent form, scoring 3.8 goals per game across their last five appearances, so turnaround scenarios or a visitors’ win after the break still retain a significant probability. The strongest individual HT/FT outcome remains 1/1, as Atlanta more often imposes itself from the outset, while Chicago’s weak defense concedes an average of 1.73 goals per match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Atlanta United II | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Chicago Fire II is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Atlanta United II · 1.8 pts / game - Chicago Fire II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Atlanta United II scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 meczów), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 meczów).
Chicago Fire II scores in 82% of games (18 of 22 meczów), while Atlanta United II keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Atlanta United II
Over / Under - Chicago Fire II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire II is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.59 pts / game - Atlanta United II · 1.68 pts / game - Chicago Fire II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Atlanta United II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Chicago Fire II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 41%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 3.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Atlanta United II
Chicago Fire II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Atlanta United II | Liga | Chicago Fire II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.68 | 3.27 | ▲ 3.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 59% | 61% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 66% | ▲ 82% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 22% | • 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 76% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 84% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Atlanta United II's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Chicago Fire II. Games average 4.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Atlanta United II 2:1 Chicago Fire II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Atlanta United II and Chicago Fire II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Atlanta United II won 3, Chicago Fire II won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II?
Atlanta United II score 2.05 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire II 2.00. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Atlanta United II's matches and 68% of Chicago Fire II's.
What form are Atlanta United II and Chicago Fire II in?
Over the last 5 games Atlanta United II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Chicago Fire II 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


