Australia - A-LeagueData current as of 24 July 2026

Auckland vs Melbourne City FC: match statistics

Auckland crest
Auckland
8 : 7half-time 1:0
Melbourne City FC crest
Melbourne City FC

Auckland vs Melbourne City FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Auckland play Melbourne City FC in A-League (Australia). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 07:00. Final score: 8:7.

Current form

Auckland: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Melbourne City FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Auckland scores 1.60 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Melbourne City FC scores 1.26 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Auckland 67%, Melbourne City FC 52%. Over 2.5: Auckland 57%, Melbourne City FC 44%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Auckland has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.54. Auckland: 15.6 shots per match, Melbourne City FC: 13.1.

Match halves

Auckland: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.73. Melbourne City FC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Auckland: 31-45+ (10 goals). Melbourne City FC: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A-League: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Auckland has the advantage in quality of chances at home: average xG 2.02 and 18.77 shots per match (including 6.31 on target), while Melbourne on the road generates an average 1.38 xG and 12.15 shots with 3.92 on target. The hosts have scored 42 goals this season and average 1.54 goals per home match, but are in poor form — 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses in the last 5 matches and only 0.6 points per game in that span. Melbourne arrive in good form (4 wins in the last 5 and 11 goals in those matches, 2.4 PPG), although away they score only 1.15 goals on average and have 23% of matches without a goal. Defensively Auckland concedes 1.31 goals at home on average (xG against 1.21), while Melbourne concede 1.54 goals away (xG against 1.46), which gives the hosts a defensive edge in this matchup. Considering the clear xG advantage (2.02 vs 1.38), higher shot volume and lower share of scoreless matches for Auckland (8% vs 23%), I predict a slight home advantage, although a draw remains a realistic scenario.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
AucklandMelbourne City FC
17Shots17
AucklandMelbourne City FC
6Shots on target4
AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.83xG2
AucklandMelbourne City FC
6Corners6
AucklandMelbourne City FC
45Dangerous attacks88
AucklandMelbourne City FC
13Fouls16
AucklandMelbourne City FC
4Cards1
AucklandMelbourne City FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.6Goals scored / match1.26
AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.03Goals conceded / match1.26
AucklandMelbourne City FC
50%Average possession55%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
5.13Shots on target / match4.22
AucklandMelbourne City FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.63Shots per match13.11
AucklandMelbourne City FC
5.13Shots on target4.22
AucklandMelbourne City FC
10.2%Shot conversion9.6%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
50%Possession55%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.7xG for1.54
AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.3xG against1.37
AucklandMelbourne City FC

Shooting quality

Auckland: AttackingMelbourne City FC: Balanced
AucklandMelbourne City FC
Accuracy (shots on target)33%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Melbourne City FC is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Auckland · 2 pts / match - Melbourne City FC

Auckland
DDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
43% W37% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-11-6
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-6-4
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Melbourne City FC
WWWLD
Season result split
37% W33% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-8
1.44 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-7-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auckland is 27% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - Auckland · 1.26 goals / match - Melbourne City FC

Auckland is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Auckland · 1.26 goals / match - Melbourne City FC

Auckland scoring profile: very strong

Auckland scores in 93% of matches (28 of 30 matches), while Melbourne City FC keeps a clean sheet in 37% (10 of 27 matches).

Melbourne City FC scoring profile: very strong

Melbourne City FC scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Auckland keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).

48Goals scored (season)34
AucklandMelbourne City FC
31Goals conceded (season)34
AucklandMelbourne City FC
2.63Average goals in match2.52
AucklandMelbourne City FC
8Goals scored (last 5)9
AucklandMelbourne City FC
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
AucklandMelbourne City FC

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal78%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
47%2 goals33%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
13%3 goals11%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
3%4 goals4%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal63%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
30%2 goals30%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
3%3 goals19%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
0%4 goals7%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
Melbourne City FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 27 matches
60%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time19%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
10%BTTS in both halves4%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
37%Scored in both halves22%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
60%BTTS - last 580%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auckland is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.7 pts / match - Auckland · 1.37 pts / match - Melbourne City FC

Auckland - half-time state
43% leading40% draw17% trailing
Melbourne City FC - half-time state
33% leading37% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.7Points per match (1st half)1.37
AucklandMelbourne City FC
0.87Goals scored (1st half)0.59
AucklandMelbourne City FC
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.15
AucklandMelbourne City FC
57%Clean sheet before half-time59%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
27%No goal before half-time48%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.37
AucklandMelbourne City FC
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
AucklandMelbourne City FC
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
AucklandMelbourne City FC
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.37
AucklandMelbourne City FC
60%Clean sheet after half-time52%
AucklandMelbourne City FC
43%No goal after half-time52%
AucklandMelbourne City FC

Auckland - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
51
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Melbourne City FC - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
37
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Auckland - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Melbourne City FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Auckland
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
8
5
16-30
10
7
31-45
8
4
46-60
7
4
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Melbourne City FC
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
8
3
16-30
4
6
31-45
3
2
46-60
6
5
61-75
9
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Auckland

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Melbourne City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A-League).

Teams vs league

AucklandLigaMelbourne City FC
Average goals in match 2.632.82 2.52
Both teams scored 67%60% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%56% 44%
Clean sheets 30%23% 37%
Goal before half-time 83%72% 74%
Goal after half-time 77%82% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Auckland 1 - 0 - 1 Melbourne City FC. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Auckland vs Melbourne City FC?

The A-League match finished Auckland 8:7 Melbourne City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Auckland and Melbourne City FC?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Auckland won 1, Melbourne City FC won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Auckland vs Melbourne City FC?

Auckland score 1.60 goals per game on average and Melbourne City FC 1.26. The A-League average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Auckland's matches and 52% of Melbourne City FC's.

What form are Auckland and Melbourne City FC in?

Over the last 5 games Auckland have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Melbourne City FC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auckland vs Melbourne City FC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auckland vs Melbourne City FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.