Latvia - VirsligaĶekavas stadionsData current as of September 06, 2026

Auda vs Liepāja: match statistics

Auda crest
Auda
3 : 1half-time 2:0
Liepāja crest
Liepāja

Auda vs Liepāja: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Auda played against Liepāja in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on May 22, 2026. Venue: Ķekavas stadions. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Auda has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Liepāja has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Auda scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.46. Liepāja scores 1.23 and allows 1.46. Games in this league average 3.10 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 69% of Auda's games and 62% of Liepāja's. The Over 2.5 rates are 77% and 54%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Auda has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.43 per game. Auda takes 12.8 shots per game, while Liepāja takes 11.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Auda leads at halftime in 46% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Liepāja leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.77 after halftime.

When the teams score

Auda's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For Liepāja, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 3.10 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda is the match favorite: at home they average 2.33 goals per game (26 goals this season, 12 in the last 5), while Liepāja score only 0.83 goals per away game (16 goals this season, 7 in the last 5). The hosts register an average of 5 shots on target per game and a conversion rate of 18% at home, whereas the visitors have 3.67 shots on target and a 6% conversion rate away, indicating a significant efficiency edge. xG is similar (1.67 xG for Auda at home vs 1.56 xG for Liepāja away), but Auda fail to score in only 17% of home matches versus 50% of Liepāja’s away matches, which further favors the hosts. In the last 5 matches Auda have scored 12 goals and recorded 3 wins with an average of 1.8 points per game, while Liepāja have 7 goals and 1.4 points per game and a negative away goal difference of -6, therefore I predict an Auda victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The primary case for BTTS - Yes is Auda’s very high seasonal rate of matches with both teams scoring: 86%, combined with zero clean sheets (0%) and an average of 1.14 goals conceded per match, meaning the hosts almost always concede at least one goal. Liepāja has a seasonal BTTS of only 33% and a low goals scored average of 0.83, but its xG_for_avg is 1.56 and over the last 5 matches it averaged 1.4 goals, i.e. it creates chances despite poor finishing (conversion rate 6%). Auda scores 1.57 goals seasonally and has a high conversion of 16%, and in the last 5 matches scored 12 goals (2.4 avg) and conceded 9 (1.8 avg), which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Additionally, the league’s BTTS is 60% with an average goals per match of 3.07, and in H2H xG terms against Auda’s defense (xG_against 1.26) Liepāja generates xG 1.56, suggesting realistic chances for an away goal. Considering the strong signal from Auda (86% BTTS, 0% clean sheets) and Liepāja’s offensive numbers in xG and the last 5 matches, I assess the probability of BTTS at 70% for Yes and 30% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and goals-per-game analysis points to a high-goals potential: Auda’s xG is 1.32 and xG against Liepāja is 1.47, yielding expected home goals of ~1.40; Liepāja’s xG is 1.56 and xG against Auda 1.26, yielding expected away goals of ~1.41, total 2.81. This aligns with form and seasonal stats: Auda averages 1.57 goals per home game, Liepāja 0.83, and in the last 5 matches Auda averaged 2.4 goals, Liepāja 1.4 (combined 3.8). Line statistics show Over 1.5 goals occurs frequently — 86% of Auda’s home matches and 67% of Liepāja’s matches; Over 2.5 is moderately likely (57% for hosts, 50% for guests, league average 55%). Given the projected 2.81 goals, Auda’s high rate of both teams scoring (86% at home) and Auda’s superior finishing (conversion rate 16% vs 6% for Liepāja), I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal; Over 2.5 also has an edge but is less certain.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Auda led at half-time in 4 of 7 matches this season (57%) and averages 0.57 goals by the break versus 0.33 for Liepāja, with no draws at half-time (0%). In the second half Auda averages 1.00 goal scored and 0.71 conceded, while Liepāja scores 0.50 and concedes 1.00 after the break, giving Auda a better post-break balance and a greater chance to hold or extend a lead. Despite higher xG for the visitors (1.56 vs 1.32), Auda converts chances far more efficiently (conversion rate 16% vs 6%) and registers more shots on target (4.43 vs 3.67), supporting a higher home win percentage (43% vs 33%). Additionally, 86% of Auda’s home matches have featured both teams scoring, so the most likely scenario is Auda leading at the break and the home side winning at full-time (HT/FT 1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

62Possession (%)38
AudaLiepāja
14Shots10
AudaLiepāja
5Shots on target3
AudaLiepāja
1.83xG1.25
AudaLiepāja
7Corners4
AudaLiepāja
83Dangerous attacks57
AudaLiepāja
19Fouls19
AudaLiepāja
2Cards3
AudaLiepāja

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2Goals scored / game1.23
AudaLiepāja
1.46Goals allowed / game1.46
AudaLiepāja
57%Average possession53%
AudaLiepāja
4.62Shots on target / game4.08
AudaLiepāja

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.77Shots per game11.69
AudaLiepāja
4.62Shots on target4.08
AudaLiepāja
15.7%Shot conversion10.5%
AudaLiepāja
57%Possession53%
AudaLiepāja
1.57xG for1.43
AudaLiepāja
1.21xG against1.36
AudaLiepāja

Shooting quality

Auda: Efficient finishingLiepāja: Balanced
AudaLiepāja
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Auda is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Auda · 1.4 pts / game - Liepāja

Auda
WWWLL
Season result split
62% W8% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-1-4
1.92 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Liepāja
DLLWW
Season result split
38% W23% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-5
1.38 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 63% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Auda · 1.23 goals / game - Liepāja

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 92% of games (12 of 13 meczów), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 meczów).

Liepāja scoring profile: very strong

Liepāja scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 meczów).

26Goals scored (season)16
AudaLiepāja
19Goals conceded (season)19
AudaLiepāja
3.46Average goals per game2.69
AudaLiepāja
12Goals scored (last 5)7
AudaLiepāja
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
AudaLiepāja

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal69%
AudaLiepāja
62%2 goals38%
AudaLiepāja
15%3 goals8%
AudaLiepāja
8%4 goals8%
AudaLiepāja

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal92%
AudaLiepāja
38%2 goals31%
AudaLiepāja
23%3 goals8%
AudaLiepāja
8%4 goals8%
AudaLiepāja

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time0%
AudaLiepāja
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AudaLiepāja
46%Scored in both halves23%
AudaLiepāja

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
AudaLiepāja
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
AudaLiepāja
60%BTTS - last 560%
AudaLiepāja

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

92%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
AudaLiepāja
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
AudaLiepāja
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
AudaLiepāja

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
AudaLiepāja
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
AudaLiepāja
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
AudaLiepāja

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.62 pts / game - Auda · 1.31 pts / game - Liepāja

Auda - half-time state
46% leading23% draw31% trailing
Liepāja - half-time state
38% leading15% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.62Points per game (1st half)1.31
AudaLiepāja
1Goals scored (1st half)0.46
AudaLiepāja
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
AudaLiepāja
1.77Average goals (1st half)1.08
AudaLiepāja
46%Clean sheet before half-time54%
AudaLiepāja
23%No goal before half-time62%
AudaLiepāja

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per game (2nd half)1.23
AudaLiepāja
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
AudaLiepāja
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
AudaLiepāja
1.69Average goals (2nd half)1.62
AudaLiepāja
46%Clean sheet after half-time23%
AudaLiepāja
38%No goal after half-time46%
AudaLiepāja

Auda - second-half results

31% W46% R23% P
21
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at halftime in 46% of games and wins 62%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Liepāja - second-half results

31% W31% R38% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Auda - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game1.41.0
Goals allowed / game1.20.6
Average goals per game2.61.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Liepāja - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.22.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Auda
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
4
31-45
6
3
46-60
2
2
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Liepāja
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
0
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
0
2
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Liepāja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

AudaLigaLiepāja
Average goals per game 3.463.10 2.69
Both teams scored 69%59% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 77%57% 54%
Clean sheets 23%21% 8%
Goal before half-time 92%77% 85%
Goal after half-time 85%87% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.10
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / game
1.45
Away goals / game
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LiepājaYellow cardVladislavs Sorokins
  2. AudaYellow cardYouba Traore
  3. AudaGoalJosé MendietaAssist: Kader Kone
  4. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Djibril GueyeOff: Kyvon Leidsman
  5. AudaSubstitutionOn: Meleye DiagneOff: Kader Kone
  6. AudaYellow cardAriel Arroyo
  7. AudaSubstitutionOn: Ariel ArroyoOff: Ibrahim Pekegnon Kone
  8. LiepājaYellow cardAndrii Korobenko
  9. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Danila PatijčuksOff: Ivans Patrikejevs

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Auda's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against Liepāja. Games average 2.20 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.

Liepāja
1 : 2
Auda
FK Auda Riga
1 : 2
FK Liepāja
FK Liepāja
2 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Liepāja
0 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
3 : 0
FK Liepāja

FAQ

What was the result of Auda vs Liepāja?

The Virsliga match finished Auda 3:1 Liepāja. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Auda and Liepāja?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Auda won 2, Liepāja won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs Liepāja?

Auda score 2.00 goals per game on average and Liepāja 1.23. The Virsliga average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Auda's matches and 62% of Liepāja's.

What form are Auda and Liepāja in?

Over the last 5 games Auda have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Liepāja 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs Liepāja?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auda vs Liepāja: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.