Audace Cerignola vs Sorrento Calcio: match statistics
Audace Cerignola holds a clear advantage in home matches with a 40% win rate and a solid goal difference (+3). The hosts average 1.53 goals per game at home alongside 40% clean sheets, indicating a stable defense. Sorrento Calcio shows very poor away form with just a 27% win rate and a negative goal difference (-11), scoring an average of only 0.73 goals per away match. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.61 vs 1.06), and the visitors fail to score in 47% of their away games. Both teams' recent form (Cerignola 1.2 PPG vs Sorrento 0.6 PPG) further supports a home victory, although their instability in the last five matches might leave the door open for a draw.
Audace Cerignola vs Sorrento Calcio: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Audace Cerignola played against Sorrento Calcio in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on March 15, 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Audace Cerignola has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Sorrento Calcio has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Audace Cerignola scores 1.29 goals per game and allows 1.32. Sorrento Calcio scores 1.03 and allows 1.42. Games in this league average 2.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Audace Cerignola's games and 52% of Sorrento Calcio's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 48%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Audace Cerignola has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.20 per game. Audace Cerignola takes 12.6 shots per game, while Sorrento Calcio takes 9.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Audace Cerignola leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.77 goals per game after halftime. Sorrento Calcio leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
Audace Cerignola's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (10 goals). For Sorrento Calcio, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group C games average 2.48 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Audace Cerignola holds a clear advantage in home matches with a 40% win rate and a solid goal difference (+3). The hosts average 1.53 goals per game at home alongside 40% clean sheets, indicating a stable defense. Sorrento Calcio shows very poor away form with just a 27% win rate and a negative goal difference (-11), scoring an average of only 0.73 goals per away match. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.61 vs 1.06), and the visitors fail to score in 47% of their away games. Both teams' recent form (Cerignola 1.2 PPG vs Sorrento 0.6 PPG) further supports a home victory, although their instability in the last five matches might leave the door open for a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Audace Cerignola | Sorrento Calcio | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Audace Cerignola is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Audace Cerignola · 0.6 pts / game - Sorrento Calcio
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Audace Cerignola is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
1.29 goals / game - Audace Cerignola · 1.03 goals / game - Sorrento Calcio
Audace Cerignola is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.32 goals / game - Audace Cerignola · 1.42 goals / game - Sorrento Calcio
Audace Cerignola scores in 68% of games (21 of 31 meczów), while Sorrento Calcio keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 31 meczów).
Sorrento Calcio scores in 65% of games (20 of 31 meczów), while Audace Cerignola keeps a clean sheet in 35% (11 of 31 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Audace Cerignola
Over / Under - Sorrento Calcio
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Audace Cerignola - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sorrento Calcio - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Audace Cerignola
Sorrento Calcio
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Audace Cerignola | Liga | Sorrento Calcio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.61 | 2.48 | • 2.45 |
| Both teams scored | • 48% | 49% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 52% | 47% | • 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 30% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 67% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 78% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Audace Cerignola's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Sorrento Calcio. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Audace Cerignola vs Sorrento Calcio?
The Serie C Group C match finished Audace Cerignola 3:2 Sorrento Calcio. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Audace Cerignola vs Sorrento Calcio?
Audace Cerignola score 1.29 goals per game on average and Sorrento Calcio 1.03. The Serie C Group C average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Audace Cerignola's matches and 52% of Sorrento Calcio's.
What form are Audace Cerignola and Sorrento Calcio in?
Over the last 5 games Audace Cerignola have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Sorrento Calcio 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Audace Cerignola vs Sorrento Calcio?
The statistical background for Audace Cerignola vs Sorrento Calcio — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


