Aurora vs Wilstermann: match statistics
Aurora vs Wilstermann: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Aurora played against Wilstermann in LFPB (Bolivia). The game was played on November 30, 2025. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Aurora has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Wilstermann has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Aurora scores 1.72 goals per game and allows 2.16. Wilstermann scores 0.88 and allows 2.20. Games in this league average 3.46 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 80% of Aurora's games and 60% of Wilstermann's. The Over 2.5 rates are 76% and 52%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Aurora has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.31 per game. Aurora takes 15.6 shots per game, while Wilstermann takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Aurora leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.96 goals per game after halftime. Wilstermann leads at halftime in 8% and scores 0.56 after halftime.
When the teams score
Aurora's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Wilstermann, it is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
LFPB games average 3.46 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Aurora | Wilstermann | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Aurora is 95% better for: goals scored per game.
1.72 goals / game - Aurora · 0.88 goals / game - Wilstermann
Aurora scores in 84% of games (21 of 25 meczów), while Wilstermann keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 25 meczów).
Wilstermann scores in 64% of games (16 of 25 meczów), while Aurora keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Aurora
Over / Under - Wilstermann
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Aurora is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.12 pts / game - Aurora · 0.56 pts / game - Wilstermann
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Aurora - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Wilstermann - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 12%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Aurora
Wilstermann
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LFPB).
Teams vs league
| Aurora | Liga | Wilstermann | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.88 | 3.46 | ▼ 3.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 65% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 76% | 65% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 20% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 80% | ▼ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | • 88% | 87% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Aurora's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Wilstermann. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Aurora vs Wilstermann?
The LFPB match finished Aurora 1:0 Wilstermann. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Aurora vs Wilstermann?
Aurora score 1.72 goals per game on average and Wilstermann 0.88. The LFPB average is 3.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Aurora's matches and 60% of Wilstermann's.
What form are Aurora and Wilstermann in?
Over the last 5 games Aurora have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Wilstermann 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aurora vs Wilstermann?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Aurora vs Wilstermann: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.