Austin II vs Whitecaps II: match statistics
Austin II vs Whitecaps II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Austin II played against Whitecaps II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on August 16, 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Recent form
Austin II has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Whitecaps II has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Austin II scores 2.05 goals per game and allows 0.86. Whitecaps II scores 1.32 and allows 2.18. Games in this league average 3.25 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of Austin II's games and 73% of Whitecaps II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 68%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Austin II has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.60 per game. Austin II takes 13.5 shots per game, while Whitecaps II takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Austin II leads at halftime in 57% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Whitecaps II leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.77 after halftime.
When the teams score
Austin II's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (11 goals). For Whitecaps II, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS Next Pro games average 3.25 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Austin II top the home standings, while Whitecaps II sit 26th in the away classification, clearly highlighting the difference in levels. The hosts win 64% of their home matches, score an average of 2.09 goals, and have failed to score in none of their home games, whereas the visitors have not won a single away match and lose as many as 82% of such fixtures. Whitecaps II’s away defense concedes an average of 2.55 goals per match with an xG against of 1.93, and keeps a clean sheet in only 9% of appearances. Austin II create more quality chances, posting a home xG of 1.61 compared with Whitecaps II’s 1.41 away from home, while also averaging 5 shots on target per match against 3.91 for their opponents. Recent form also favors the hosts: they have collected 8 points from five matches, while Whitecaps II have managed just 4 and conceded 13 goals during that period.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The “Yes” pick is supported by a high seasonal BTTS rate: 64% in Austin II matches and as much as 82% in Whitecaps II fixtures, compared with the league average of 61%. Whitecaps II concede an average of 2.55 goals per match, rising to 2.6 over their last five appearances, which significantly increases Austin II’s chances of scoring. The hosts produce an average xG of 1.80, while the visitors record 1.41, with both sides keeping clean sheets in only 9% of matches. Austin II have been more solid defensively recently, conceding 1.0 goal per match, but Whitecaps II have averaged 1.4 goals scored during this period and generated an xG of 1.43. Additionally, over 2.5 goals and goals from both teams occurred simultaneously in 73% of Whitecaps II matches, making a scenario with both sides scoring the most likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile clearly favors goals: at least 2 goals were scored in 91% of Austin II matches and in 82% of Whitecaps II games. Whitecaps II concede an average of 2.55 goals per match, rising to 2.60 over their last five appearances, while Austin II have scored 1.80 goals during the same period. The hosts’ attacking potential is supported by an average xG of 1.80, whereas the visitors’ defense allows an average of 1.93 xG. The visitors should also contribute, as both teams conceded at least one goal in 91% of their matches, while the percentage of games in which both teams scored stands at 64% and 82%, respectively. The Over 1.5 goals line is the strongest pick, supported by both a very high historical frequency and a forecast of 3.30 goals in the match overall.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Austin II have a clear advantage at half-time: in their last five matches, they were leading after 45 minutes in 60% of games, while Whitecaps II have not once gone into the break ahead and were trailing in 60% of cases. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.2 goals scored and just 0.4 conceded before half-time, whereas the visitors scored 0.6 and conceded as many as 1.6. Whitecaps II have also performed very poorly in terms of results throughout the season: they have not won a single match, lost 82% of their games, and concede an average of 2.55 goals per match. Austin II create more chances, as reflected by their average xG of 1.80 compared with 1.41 for their opponents, while the visitors' defense allows an average xG of 1.93. The most likely scenario is therefore for Austin II to take the lead at the break and maintain it until the end of the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Austin II | Whitecaps II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Austin II is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Austin II · 0.8 pts / game - Whitecaps II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Austin II is 55% better for: goals scored per game.
2.05 goals / game - Austin II · 1.32 goals / game - Whitecaps II
Austin II is 153% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.86 goals / game - Austin II · 2.18 goals / game - Whitecaps II
Austin II scores in 100% of games (21 of 21 games), while Whitecaps II keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 22 games).
Whitecaps II scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 games), while Austin II keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Austin II
Over / Under - Whitecaps II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Austin II is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Austin II · 0.86 pts / game - Whitecaps II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Austin II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 57% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Whitecaps II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Austin II
Whitecaps II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Austin II | Liga | Whitecaps II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.90 | 3.25 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 61% | ▲ 73% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 66% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 22% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 75% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 84% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Austin II's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Whitecaps II. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Austin II vs Whitecaps II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Austin II 4:1 Whitecaps II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Austin II and Whitecaps II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Austin II won 1, Whitecaps II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Austin II vs Whitecaps II?
Austin II score 2.05 goals per game on average and Whitecaps II 1.32. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Austin II's matches and 73% of Whitecaps II's.
What form are Austin II and Whitecaps II in?
Over the last 5 games Austin II have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Whitecaps II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Austin II vs Whitecaps II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Austin II vs Whitecaps II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.