Austin vs Colorado Rapids: match statistics
Austin vs Colorado Rapids: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Austin played against Colorado Rapids in MLS (United States). The game was played on September 10, 2026. Venue: Q2 Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Austin has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Colorado Rapids has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Austin scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 1.83. Colorado Rapids scores 1.35 and allows 1.35. Games in this league average 3.21 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Austin's games and 39% of Colorado Rapids's. The Over 2.5 rates are 70% and 48%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Colorado Rapids has the higher season xG average, 1.34 to 1.26 per game. Austin takes 10.9 shots per game, while Colorado Rapids takes 11.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Austin leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. Colorado Rapids leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
Austin's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Colorado Rapids, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.21 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Austin have significantly stronger home figures: they average 1.4 goals per match, with an xG of 1.43, while Colorado score just 0.91 goals away from home and create chances worth 0.95 xG. The hosts lose 30% of their home matches, whereas the visitors lose as many as 73% of their away games, with a -9 goal difference on the road. The Rapids’ away defense concedes an average of 1.73 goals and keeps a clean sheet in just 18% of matches, which favors Austin, who have failed to score in only 10% of their home fixtures. However, Colorado arrive on the back of 4 wins in their last 5 matches and have conceded just 3 goals during that period, so the draw remains a significant risk. Despite the visitors’ stronger recent run, Austin’s advantage in the quality of their home chances, 55% possession and their opponents’ poor away record all point towards a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No scenario is more likely primarily due to Colorado’s poor away finishing: the team averages just 0.83 goals scored away from home and fails to score in 50% of such matches. Austin concedes only 0.82 goals per home game and keeps a clean sheet in 55% of its home fixtures, which clearly limits the visitors’ chances of scoring. The seasonal BTTS rates for both teams are only 36% for Austin and 42% for Colorado, significantly below the league average of 62%. The hosts should have good conditions to score, as they create an average of 1.76 xG and Colorado concedes 1.83 goals away from home, but this does not guarantee a goal for the visitors. Austin’s last five matches produced BTTS in 80% of cases, but Colorado recorded no such match during the same period, strengthening the pick that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Austin score an average of 1.91 goals at home, while Colorado concede 1.83 away from home, which clearly supports the home side to score. However, the visitors are significantly weaker offensively on the road, averaging just 0.83 goals and 0.96 xG, while Austin allow an average of 1.00 xG and keep a clean sheet in 55% of matches. The overall profile does not point to an open game: 73% of Austin’s matches and 67% of Colorado’s games finished with Under 3.5 goals. In their last five appearances, both teams scored 1.2 and 0.8 goals per match respectively, further limiting the likelihood of a high-scoring game. The projected total of 2.45 goals gives a clear edge to the Under 3.5 goals option, with 1:0, 2:0 or 2:1 remaining realistic scoreline scenarios.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Austin win 73% of their matches and score an average of 1.91 goals, while Colorado lose 75% of their games, score just 0.83 goals, and concede 1.83. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in their attacking performance: their average xG is 1.76 compared with 0.96 for the visitors, while shots on target stand at 5.00 versus 2.92. Austin held a lead at the break in 36% of matches, while Colorado went into half-time behind in as many as 42% of games, supporting the scenario of the hosts leading at half-time. Even if the score is level at the break, a later Austin victory remains a strong scenario, as the hosts score an average of 1.36 goals after half-time, compared with just 0.33 for the Rapids. The 1/1 pick remains the most consistent, as Austin keep a clean sheet in 55% of matches, while Colorado fail to score in 50% of games.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Austin | Colorado Rapids | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Colorado Rapids is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Austin · 1.8 pts / game - Colorado Rapids
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Colorado Rapids is 7% better for: goals scored per game.
1.26 goals / game - Austin · 1.35 goals / game - Colorado Rapids
Colorado Rapids is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.83 goals / game - Austin · 1.35 goals / game - Colorado Rapids
Austin scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 games), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 games).
Colorado Rapids scores in 70% of games (16 of 23 games), while Austin keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Austin
Over / Under - Colorado Rapids
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Austin is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / game - Austin · 1.17 pts / game - Colorado Rapids
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Austin - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Colorado Rapids - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Austin
Colorado Rapids
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Austin | Liga | Colorado Rapids | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.09 | 3.21 | ▼ 2.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 63% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 62% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 21% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | • 78% | 77% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 81% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Austin's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Colorado Rapids. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Austin vs Colorado Rapids?
The MLS match finished Austin 1:1 Colorado Rapids. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Austin vs Colorado Rapids?
Austin score 1.26 goals per game on average and Colorado Rapids 1.35. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Austin's matches and 39% of Colorado Rapids's.
What form are Austin and Colorado Rapids in?
Over the last 5 games Austin have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Colorado Rapids 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Austin vs Colorado Rapids?
The statistical background for Austin vs Colorado Rapids — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


