Avia Świdnik vs Chełmianka Chełm: match statistics
Avia Świdnik vs Chełmianka Chełm: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Avia Świdnik played against Chełmianka Chełm in 3 Liga Group 4 (Poland). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Avia Świdnik has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Chełmianka Chełm has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Avia Świdnik scores 2.54 goals per game and allows 1.13. Chełmianka Chełm scores 1.88 and allows 0.92. Games in this league average 3.16 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Avia Świdnik's games and 58% of Chełmianka Chełm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 50%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chełmianka Chełm has the higher season xG average, 1.72 to 1.65 per game. Avia Świdnik takes 8.0 shots per game, while Chełmianka Chełm takes 2.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Avia Świdnik leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.79 goals per game after halftime. Chełmianka Chełm leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Avia Świdnik's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (33 goals). For Chełmianka Chełm, it is minutes 0-15 (21 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3 Liga Group 4 games average 3.16 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Avia Świdnik holds an advantage in offensive efficiency: the hosts score on average 2.42 goals at home and have a 33% conversion rate, compared to 1.83 goals away and 22% shooting efficiency for Chełmianka. Avia has scored 61 goals this season versus the visitors' 45 goals, and at home they have 0% of matches without a goal (they always score), which increases their chances of winning. The visitors, however, create more chances — on average 12.25 shots and 4.5 on target per match, and their away xG is 1.50 versus the hosts' xG of 1.44, which indicates a real threat. Both teams concede on average 1.17 goals per match, but Chełmianka has a higher clean sheet rate (42% vs 33%) and better form over the last 5 matches (PPG 2.6 vs the hosts' 2.0). In summary, given the 2.42 home goals and 33% conversion, I give a slight edge to Avia, although the visitors remain dangerous due to a higher volume of shots and superior form.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS rates of 58% (Avia 58%, Chełmianka 58%) versus the league rate of 56%, which already favors the "both teams to score" option (BTTS - Yes). In the last 5 matches BTTS was 60% for Avia and 80% for Chełmianka; Avia scored 14 goals (2.8 per match), Chełmianka 15 goals (3.0 per match), and both conceded 4 goals each (0.8 per match), indicating significant attacking activity combined with defensive vulnerability. Chance-quality analysis: Avia has a season xG of 2.18 and 8.5 shots on target per game versus Chełmianka with season xG against 1.03 and 4.5 shots on target against; at the same time Chełmianka’s last 5 matches show an average attacking xG of 1.68 and season goals per match of 1.83 while Avia’s last 5 xG against is 1.07 — this presents realistic scoring opportunities for both sides. Clean sheet percentage is 42% for both teams (i.e. No Goal in 42% of matches), and 0:0 matches occur only in 8% of cases; given Avia’s higher conversion (26% vs 22% for Chełmianka) and recent form over the last 5 rounds, the BTTS scenario is stronger. Weighing season-long data and strong signals from the last 5 matches, I assess BTTS probability at 72% and No BTTS at 28%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model and defensive comparison yield combined expected goals of approximately 2.88: Avia’s xG is 2.18 versus Chełmianka’s defense xG allowed of 1.03, which averages to ~1.61 for Avia; similarly Chełmianka’s xG of 1.50 versus Avia’s defense 1.03 gives ~1.27 for the visitors. With total lambda = 2.88, a Poisson distribution implies roughly a 78% chance of Over 1.5 goals, ~55% for Over 2.5 and ~33% for Over 3.5. Historical data corroborate the offensive nature: Chełmianka have 92% of matches Over 1.5 goals, Avia 67%, and in their last 5 matches Avia scored 14 goals (avg 2.8), Chełmianka 15 goals (avg 3.0) with each conceding 4. Shot metrics support this picture: Avia averages 19.0 shots and 8.5 on target with a 26% conversion, Chełmianka 12.25 shots and 4.5 on target with a 22% conversion, therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (pick: Over at the 1.5 line).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Avia Świdnik shows a strong signal for a lead at the break: they led at half-time in 8 matches (73% of their games) and average 1.18 first-half goals versus 0.7 for Chełmianka. Additionally, the hosts’ xG is 2.18 compared to 1.50 for the visitors, and average shots on target are 8.5 vs 4.5, indicating a clear home advantage in chance creation. Nevertheless, Avia’s matches end with both teams scoring in 58% of cases, and the visitors average 0.8 goals in the second half, so there is a real risk of conceding after the break. The hosts earn an average of 2.42 points per match versus 1.83 for the visitors and have a higher shot conversion rate (26% vs 22%), so the most likely scenario is maintaining the lead at half-time and a home victory (HT/FT 1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Avia Świdnik | Chełmianka Chełm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 25% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.21 | 0.60 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.71 | 2.65 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Avia Świdnik is 35% better for: goals scored per game.
2.54 goals / game - Avia Świdnik · 1.88 goals / game - Chełmianka Chełm
Chełmianka Chełm is 23% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.13 goals / game - Avia Świdnik · 0.92 goals / game - Chełmianka Chełm
Avia Świdnik scores in 100% of games (24 of 24 meczów), while Chełmianka Chełm keeps a clean sheet in 42% (10 of 24 meczów).
Chełmianka Chełm scores in 92% of games (22 of 24 meczów), while Avia Świdnik keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Avia Świdnik
Over / Under - Chełmianka Chełm
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chełmianka Chełm is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Avia Świdnik · 1.83 pts / game - Chełmianka Chełm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Avia Świdnik - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Chełmianka Chełm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +8 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (33 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (22). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (21 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Avia Świdnik
Chełmianka Chełm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 4).
Teams vs league
| Avia Świdnik | Liga | Chełmianka Chełm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.67 | 3.16 | ▼ 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 58% | • 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 24% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 46% | 54% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 42% | 56% | ▲ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Avia Świdnik's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Chełmianka Chełm. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Avia Świdnik vs Chełmianka Chełm?
The 3 Liga Group 4 match finished Avia Świdnik 1:0 Chełmianka Chełm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Avia Świdnik vs Chełmianka Chełm?
Avia Świdnik score 2.54 goals per game on average and Chełmianka Chełm 1.88. The 3 Liga Group 4 average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Avia Świdnik's matches and 58% of Chełmianka Chełm's.
What form are Avia Świdnik and Chełmianka Chełm in?
Over the last 5 games Avia Świdnik have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Chełmianka Chełm 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Avia Świdnik vs Chełmianka Chełm?
The statistical background for Avia Świdnik vs Chełmianka Chełm — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


