Avispa Fukuoka vs Gamba Osaka: match statistics
Avispa Fukuoka vs Gamba Osaka: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Avispa Fukuoka played against Gamba Osaka in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on November 30, 2025. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Avispa Fukuoka has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Gamba Osaka has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Avispa Fukuoka scores 0.92 goals per game and allows 1.03. Gamba Osaka scores 1.36 and allows 1.47. Games in this league average 2.40 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of Avispa Fukuoka's games and 42% of Gamba Osaka's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 47%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Gamba Osaka has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.42 per game. Avispa Fukuoka takes 12.9 shots per game, while Gamba Osaka takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Avispa Fukuoka leads at halftime in 11% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. Gamba Osaka leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.92 after halftime.
When the teams score
Avispa Fukuoka's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Gamba Osaka, it is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
J1 League games average 2.40 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Avispa Fukuoka | Gamba Osaka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gamba Osaka is 48% better for: goals scored per game.
0.92 goals / game - Avispa Fukuoka · 1.36 goals / game - Gamba Osaka
Avispa Fukuoka is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.03 goals / game - Avispa Fukuoka · 1.47 goals / game - Gamba Osaka
Avispa Fukuoka scores in 64% of games (23 of 36 meczów), while Gamba Osaka keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 meczów).
Gamba Osaka scores in 67% of games (24 of 36 meczów), while Avispa Fukuoka keeps a clean sheet in 42% (15 of 36 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Avispa Fukuoka
Over / Under - Gamba Osaka
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Avispa Fukuoka is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / game - Avispa Fukuoka · 0.94 pts / game - Gamba Osaka
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Avispa Fukuoka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Gamba Osaka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Avispa Fukuoka
Gamba Osaka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Avispa Fukuoka | Liga | Gamba Osaka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.94 | 2.40 | ▲ 2.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 47% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 44% | ▲ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 31% | • 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 42% | 60% | ▲ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 75% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Avispa Fukuoka's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Gamba Osaka. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Avispa Fukuoka vs Gamba Osaka?
The J1 League match finished Avispa Fukuoka 1:0 Gamba Osaka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Avispa Fukuoka vs Gamba Osaka?
Avispa Fukuoka score 0.92 goals per game on average and Gamba Osaka 1.36. The J1 League average is 2.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Avispa Fukuoka's matches and 42% of Gamba Osaka's.
What form are Avispa Fukuoka and Gamba Osaka in?
Over the last 5 games Avispa Fukuoka have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Gamba Osaka 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Avispa Fukuoka vs Gamba Osaka?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.