Japan - J1 LeagueData current as of October 18, 2026

Avispa Fukuoka vs Mito Hollyhock: match statistics

Avispa Fukuoka vs Mito Hollyhock: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Avispa Fukuoka played against Mito Hollyhock in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Avispa Fukuoka has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Mito Hollyhock has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Avispa Fukuoka scores 1.60 goals per game and allows 1.80. Mito Hollyhock scores 2.00 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 3.08 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Avispa Fukuoka's games and 100% of Mito Hollyhock's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 60%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Avispa Fukuoka has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.41 per game. Avispa Fukuoka takes 15.6 shots per game, while Mito Hollyhock takes 13.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Avispa Fukuoka leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Mito Hollyhock leads at halftime in 60% and scores 0.80 after halftime.

When the teams score

Avispa Fukuoka's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Mito Hollyhock, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

J1 League games average 3.08 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams have a very similar season record: Avispa Fukuoka have scored 6 goals and conceded 6, while Mito Hollyhock have scored 6 and conceded 5. The hosts are clearly more solid defensively at home, conceding just 0.5 goals on average with opponents’ xG at 0.90, whereas Mito allow 1.5 goals and 1.48 xG away from home. However, the visitors create more chances, averaging 15.5 shots and 4.5 on target per match compared with Avispa’s 12 and 4, while their xG stands at 1.58 versus 1.29 for the hosts. Both teams’ form remains average: Avispa have collected 0.8 points per match in their last five games, while Mito have averaged 1 point, with records of 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, and 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, respectively. Avispa’s defensive advantage at home should offset the visitors’ greater attacking activity, making a draw the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal signal clearly supports goals from both sides: Avispa and Mito both have a 100% BTTS rate, and neither team has kept a clean sheet yet. Mito scores an average of 2.0 goals per match, while Avispa concedes an average of 1.0, although the hosts allow opponents a high xG of 1.84. Avispa should also create chances, as their average xG stands at 1.46, while Mito concedes an average of 1.5 goals and allows opponents an xG of 1.48. Caution is warranted due to Avispa’s last five matches, in which BTTS occurred in only 40% of games. However, Mito has recorded 80% over the same period, with both teams averaging 1.2 goals. As a result, the more likely scenario is that each side scores at least one goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have gone above this line in 100% of their league matches so far. Avispa average 1.0 goals at home but create chances worth 1.46 xG, while Mito score as many as 2.0 goals per away game with 1.58 xG. Neither team has kept a clean sheet yet, and both teams have scored in 100% of their matches, which clearly reduces the likelihood of a very tight match. In their last five appearances, the teams conceded 1.2 and 1.4 goals per game respectively, while the league average stands at a high 3.05 goals. The 2.5 line remains more balanced, as Avispa have had 100% of their matches finish below it so far; therefore, Over 1.5 offers the safer edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time followed by a Mito win is the most likely outcome, as Avispa have been level at the break in 40% of their last five matches, while Mito have not been leading after 45 minutes in 60% of their games during this period. The visitors look clearly stronger after the break: they average 1.0 goal in second halves compared with 0.0 for the hosts, while their second-half points tally stands at 2.0 per match versus Avispa’s 0.5. Mito also have the more effective attack across the competition, scoring an average of 2.0 goals per game compared with the hosts’ 1.0, while their xG stands at 1.58 versus 1.46. Avispa concede an average of 1.0 goal, but their defensive xG against is high at 1.84, whereas Mito create more high-quality chances and record 4.5 shots on target per match compared with their opponents’ 4.0. Both teams have scored and conceded in 100% of their matches so far, meaning that an evenly matched start does not rule out a later turnaround in favor of the more clinical visitors.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
16Shots10
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
5Shots on target4
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
1.76xG1.08
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
5Corners2
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
56Dangerous attacks22
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
4Fouls10
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
2Cards3
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
1.6Goals scored / game2
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
1.8Goals allowed / game1.4
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
43%Average possession37%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
6.2Shots on target / game4.4
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.6Shots per game13.8
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
6.2Shots on target4.4
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
10.3%Shot conversion14.5%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
43%Possession37%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
1.71xG for1.41
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
1.13xG against1.7
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock

Shooting quality

Avispa Fukuoka: AttackingMito Hollyhock: Counter-attacking
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
Accuracy (shots on target)40%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Mito Hollyhock is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Avispa Fukuoka · 1.6 pts / game - Mito Hollyhock

Avispa Fukuoka
LWLLL
Season result split
20% W0% D80% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 at home
1-0-2
LWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Mito Hollyhock
LDWDW
Season result split
40% W40% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mito Hollyhock is 25% better for: goals scored per game.

1.6 goals / game - Avispa Fukuoka · 2 goals / game - Mito Hollyhock

Mito Hollyhock is 29% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.8 goals / game - Avispa Fukuoka · 1.4 goals / game - Mito Hollyhock

Avispa Fukuoka scoring profile: very strong

Avispa Fukuoka scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 games), while Mito Hollyhock keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 games).

Mito Hollyhock scoring profile: very strong

Mito Hollyhock scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Avispa Fukuoka keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).

8Goals scored (season)10
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
9Goals conceded (season)7
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
3.4Average goals per game3.4
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
8Goals scored (last 5)10
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal100%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
60%2 goals40%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
20%3 goals40%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
0%4 goals20%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
60%2 goals40%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
40%3 goals0%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
0%4 goals0%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time20%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
20%BTTS in both halves0%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
40%Scored in both halves40%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time80%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mito Hollyhock is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / game - Avispa Fukuoka · 2 pts / game - Mito Hollyhock

Avispa Fukuoka - half-time state
40% leading20% draw40% trailing
Mito Hollyhock - half-time state
60% leading20% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per game (1st half)2
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
1Goals scored (1st half)1.2
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
1.8Average goals (1st half)1.8
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
20%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
40%No goal before half-time20%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.2
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.6
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
40%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock
40%No goal after half-time40%
Avispa FukuokaMito Hollyhock

Avispa Fukuoka - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 20%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Mito Hollyhock - second-half results

20% W60% D20% L
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 40%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Avispa Fukuoka - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game1.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.81.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Mito Hollyhock - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.20
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.81.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Avispa Fukuoka
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
4
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Mito Hollyhock
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
4
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.40
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
80%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Avispa Fukuoka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.67
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Mito Hollyhock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.89
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

Avispa FukuokaLigaMito Hollyhock
Average goals per game▲ 3.403.08▲ 3.40
Both teams scored▼ 60%62%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 80%60%• 60%
Clean sheets• 20%21%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%72%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▼ 80%84%▼ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.08
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.62
Home goals / game
1.46
Away goals / game
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Mito HollyhockYellow cardArata Watanabe
  2. Avispa FukuokaYellow cardKokoro Maeda
  3. Avispa FukuokaGoalShu MorookaAssist: Daiki Fukazawa
  4. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Koshi OsakiOff: Yu Funabashi
  5. Avispa FukuokaYellow cardShu Morooka
  6. Avispa FukuokaSubstitutionOn: Shintaro NagoOff: Werik Silva Pinto
  7. Mito HollyhockYellow cardYoshiki Torikai
  8. Avispa FukuokaSubstitutionOn: Daiki MiyaOff: Yuma Tsujioka
  9. Mito HollyhockYellow cardYasuki Kimoto
  10. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Ryo NemotoOff: Yoshiki Torikai
  11. Mito HollyhockGoalYasuki KimotoAssist: Sho Omori
  12. Avispa FukuokaSubstitutionOn: Kazuki FujimotoOff: Yu Hashimoto

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Avispa Fukuoka vs Mito Hollyhock?

The J1 League match finished Avispa Fukuoka 1:1 Mito Hollyhock. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Avispa Fukuoka vs Mito Hollyhock?

Avispa Fukuoka score 1.60 goals per game on average and Mito Hollyhock 2.00. The J1 League average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Avispa Fukuoka's matches and 100% of Mito Hollyhock's.

What form are Avispa Fukuoka and Mito Hollyhock in?

Over the last 5 games Avispa Fukuoka have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Mito Hollyhock 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Avispa Fukuoka vs Mito Hollyhock?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.