Portugal - LigaProEstádio do Clube Desportivo das AvesData current as of September 13, 2026

AVS vs Farense: match statistics

AVS crest
AVS
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Farense crest
Farense

AVS vs Farense: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

AVS played against Farense in LigaPro (Portugal). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Estádio do Clube Desportivo das Aves. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

AVS has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Farense has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 1.75 points per game.

Scoring records

AVS scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 1.20. Farense scores 1.75 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.31 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of AVS's games and 100% of Farense's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 75%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Farense has the higher season xG average, 1.93 to 1.28 per game. AVS takes 11.2 shots per game, while Farense takes 17.3.

First-half and second-half trends

AVS leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Farense leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

AVS's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Farense, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

LigaPro games average 2.31 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Farense are 8th, while AVS are 13th, and over their last five matches the visitors have averaged 1.4 points per game compared with 1.0 for the hosts. Away from home, the Faro-based side average 2 goals, 16.5 shots and 7 shots on target per match, clearly outperforming AVS, who average 1 goal, 10.5 shots and 4 attempts on target. The visitors’ advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG stands at 1.89, compared with 1.26 for AVS. AVS concede just 0.5 goals per home match, but allow opponents an xG of 1.97, suggesting that their defensive results to date may be difficult to sustain against such an active attack. Farense have not been held scoreless in any away match, making a narrow victory for the visitors the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is very strong: AVS and Farense have recorded BTTS at a rate of 100% in the current campaign, and neither team has kept a clean sheet so far. The hosts score an average of 1.5 goals and concede 1.0, while the visitors score 2.0 goals and concede 1.5 per match. Their attacking potential is supported by high average xG figures of 1.98 for AVS and 1.89 for Farense, with AVS allowing opponents as much as 2.25 xG across their last five matches. BTTS landed in 60% of AVS's and 80% of Farense's last five games, while the visitors conceded an average of 1.6 goals during this period. Although the league-wide BTTS average is only 41%, the combination of two teams yet to keep a clean sheet and their consistent chance creation clearly favors a scenario in which both teams score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The signal for at least two goals is very strong, as both AVS and Farense have gone over the 1.5-goal line in 100% of their league matches so far. The two teams average 1.5 and 2.0 goals scored respectively, and neither has kept a clean sheet yet. Their creative potential also supports an open game: AVS’s average xG is 1.98, while Farense’s stands at 1.89, with 18.0 and 16.5 shots per match respectively. In their last five matches, Farense recorded 1.93 xG, while AVS’s opponents created as much as 2.25 xG on average, which further boosts the outlook for the visitors. The Over 1.5 line offers a clearer edge than higher goal lines, as it provides protection against a 1:1 or 2:0 result.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an AVS victory, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 80% of their last five matches, compared with 60% for Farense; neither team held a lead during that period. First halves are clearly cautious: AVS score an average of 0.2 goals and concede 0.4, while Farense also score 0.2 goals but concede 0.6. After the break, AVS have the more favorable profile, scoring an average of 1.5 goals and conceding just 0.5, while also winning the second half in 100% of the available matches. The hosts also have a stronger full-season home record, scoring 1.5 goals per match and conceding 1.0, whereas Farense concede an average of 1.5 goals away from home. Although the visitors are offensively effective, AVS’s xG stands at 1.98 compared with Farense’s 1.89, while the hosts’ defensive xG of 1.00 is significantly better than the visitors’ 1.78.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
AVSFarense
11Shots13
AVSFarense
4Shots on target6
AVSFarense
1.27xG1.62
AVSFarense
6Corners2
AVSFarense
42Dangerous attacks54
AVSFarense
-1Fouls-1
AVSFarense
4Cards2
AVSFarense

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.2Goals scored / game1.75
AVSFarense
1.2Goals allowed / game1.25
AVSFarense
46%Average possession52%
AVSFarense
3.6Shots on target / game7
AVSFarense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.2Shots per game17.25
AVSFarense
3.6Shots on target7
AVSFarense
10.7%Shot conversion10.1%
AVSFarense
46%Possession52%
AVSFarense
1.28xG for1.93
AVSFarense
2.24xG against1.39
AVSFarense

Shooting quality

AVS: BalancedFarense: Attacking
AVSFarense
Accuracy (shots on target)32%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Farense is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - AVS · 1.75 pts / game - Farense

AVS
LDDWL
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 2.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Farense
WWDL
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.93Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Farense is 46% better for: goals scored per game.

1.2 goals / game - AVS · 1.75 goals / game - Farense

AVS scoring profile: very strong

AVS scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Farense keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).

Farense scoring profile: very strong

Farense scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while AVS keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).

6Goals scored (season)7
AVSFarense
6Goals conceded (season)5
AVSFarense
2.4Average goals per game3
AVSFarense
6Goals scored (last 5)7
AVSFarense
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
AVSFarense

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal100%
AVSFarense
40%2 goals50%
AVSFarense
0%3 goals25%
AVSFarense
0%4 goals0%
AVSFarense

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
AVSFarense
40%2 goals25%
AVSFarense
0%3 goals0%
AVSFarense
0%4 goals0%
AVSFarense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time25%
AVSFarense
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AVSFarense
0%Scored in both halves25%
AVSFarense

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
AVSFarense
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AVSFarense
60%BTTS - last 5100%
AVSFarense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
AVSFarense
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
AVSFarense
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AVSFarense

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
AVSFarense
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
AVSFarense
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
AVSFarense

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AVS is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / game - AVS · 0.5 pts / game - Farense

AVS - half-time state
0% leading80% draw20% trailing
Farense - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per game (1st half)0.5
AVSFarense
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.25
AVSFarense
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
AVSFarense
0.6Average goals (1st half)1
AVSFarense
60%Clean sheet before half-time25%
AVSFarense
80%No goal before half-time75%
AVSFarense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per game (2nd half)2.5
AVSFarense
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
AVSFarense
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
AVSFarense
1.8Average goals (2nd half)2
AVSFarense
20%Clean sheet after half-time50%
AVSFarense
40%No goal after half-time0%
AVSFarense

AVS - second-half results

40% W20% D40% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Farense - second-half results

75% W25% D0% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

AVS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.61.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Farense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.502.50
Goals scored / game0.31.5
Goals allowed / game0.80.5
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal75%100%
2 goals25%75%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal75%0%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 25% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

AVS
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Farense
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
80%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

AVS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.96
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.96
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+1.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Farense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
147%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LigaPro).

Teams vs league

AVSLigaFarense
Average goals per game 2.402.31 3.00
Both teams scored 60%40% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%42% 75%
Clean sheets 20%33% 0%
Goal before half-time 40%77% 75%
Goal after half-time 100%75% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per game
40%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / game
1.19
Away goals / game
+-5%
Home attack advantage
+-5%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AVSSubstitutionOn: Hiago Souza Lima SantosOff: Roni Medeiros de Moura
  2. FarenseYellow cardSarpeet Singh
  3. AVSYellow cardLazar Rosić
  4. FarenseYellow cardJoseph N'Duquidi
  5. AVSYellow cardRegis N'do

FAQ

What was the result of AVS vs Farense?

The LigaPro match finished AVS 0:0 Farense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before AVS vs Farense?

AVS score 1.20 goals per game on average and Farense 1.75. The LigaPro average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 60% of AVS's matches and 100% of Farense's.

What form are AVS and Farense in?

Over the last 5 games AVS have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Farense 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AVS vs Farense?

The statistical background for AVS vs Farense — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.