AZ II vs Roda JC: match statistics
AZ II vs Roda JC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
AZ II played against Roda JC in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The game was played on April 24, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
AZ II has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Roda JC has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
AZ II scores 1.59 goals per game and allows 2.05. Roda JC scores 1.59 and allows 1.41. Games in this league average 3.21 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of AZ II's games and 65% of Roda JC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 70% and 62%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
AZ II has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.59 per game. AZ II takes 13.7 shots per game, while Roda JC takes 14.2.
First-half and second-half trends
AZ II leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Roda JC leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.89 after halftime.
When the teams score
AZ II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (12 goals). For Roda JC, it is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eerste Divisie games average 3.21 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Roda JC is the favorite in this match: they sit 9th in the table versus AZ II in 19th, and this season Roda have 14 wins, 13 draws and 10 losses compared to the hosts’ 11 wins, 4 draws and 22 losses. In the last 5 matches AZ have scored 6 and conceded 13 (avg 1.2 scored and 2.6 conceded per game) with an average of 1.2 points from those five games, while Roda have scored 9 and conceded 5 (1.8 and 1.0) with a points average of 1.6. At home AZ average 1.33 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per match with xG 1.78 and xG against 1.35, whereas Roda away average 1.83 scored and 1.33 conceded with xG 1.53 and xG against 1.54, which shows AZ creates slightly more chances but fails to convert them. Roda have higher shot conversion 13% versus AZ’s 9%, are less likely to finish matches goalless (11% vs 33%) and win away far more often than AZ do at home (56% vs 17%), which is a key advantage. Considering Roda’s more stable defense (1.33 conceded vs 2.00), better conversion and more favorable trends over the last five matches, I predict an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Roda JC shows a strong signal for BTTS - Yes: their season BTTS rate is 78% versus 53% for AZ II, with a league average BTTS of 62%. Scoring stats indicate Roda averages 1.83 goals per match while AZ II concedes 1.47; AZ II averages 1.37 goals while Roda concedes 1.33 — both sides have figures supporting at least one goal. xG confirms chance creation: AZ II xG_for 1.65 against Roda xG_against 1.54, and Roda xG_for 1.53 against AZ II xG_against 1.42, meaning both teams are roughly +0.1 xG versus the opponent’s defense. Although AZ II has a poorer recent BTTS trend (20% in last 5) with 1.2 goals scored and 2.6 conceded on average, Roda’s last 5 show 60% BTTS with 1.8 scored and 1.0 conceded, offsetting concerns about the home form. Additionally, low clean sheet rates (26% for AZ II and 17% for Roda), a high league goals average of 3.21 and 78% of Roda’s matches over 2.5 goals make the BTTS - Yes scenario more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Matches between AZ II and Roda JC frequently exceed 1.5 goals: AZ II have 79% of their games this season with at least 2 goals, Roda JC 89%, an average of 84% between the two, which strongly supports the Over 1.5 market. Calculated expected goals (xG) are about 1.60 for AZ II (xG_for 1.65 vs xG_conceded by Roda 1.54 → average 1.60) and 1.48 for Roda JC (xG_for 1.53 vs xG_conceded by AZ II 1.42 → 1.48), totaling ~3.08 goals. Over 2.5 looks moderately likely: AZ II have 47% of matches above 2.5 this season, Roda 78% (average ~63%), which aligns with the combined xG ~3.08. Over 3.5 is less likely (32% AZ II vs 50% Roda, average 41%), so the safest and strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Roda JC is the clear favorite: the visitors average 2.0 points per match and win 56% of games, while AZ II average 1.0 point per match and have a 21% win rate, which strongly supports an away victory. However, the situation at Half-Time is balanced — AZ II score an average of 0.63 goals in the first half, Roda 0.78, and draws at the break occur frequently (37% for the hosts, 33% for the visitors); additionally, 74–83% of matches see at least one goal before the break, so I expect a goal-filled but tied Half-Time. After the break Roda’s superiority becomes apparent: the visitors score an average of 1.06 goals in the second half versus 0.74 for the hosts, concede only 0.50 and have a second-half differential of +10 compared to 0 for AZ II, which suggests a turnaround in favor of the visitors after Half-Time. Taking this into account, the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a Roda win after 90 minutes (X/2). Therefore I assigned the highest weight to X/2 (30%), followed by 2/2 (20%) and X/X (12%) as possible alternatives arising from partial balance at Half-Time and the visitors’ higher effectiveness in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| AZ II | Roda JC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Roda JC is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - AZ II · 1.6 pts / game - Roda JC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Roda JC is 45% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.05 goals / game - AZ II · 1.41 goals / game - Roda JC
AZ II scores in 70% of games (26 of 37 meczów), while Roda JC keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 37 meczów).
Roda JC scores in 81% of games (30 of 37 meczów), while AZ II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (5 of 37 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - AZ II
Over / Under - Roda JC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Roda JC is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.89 pts / game - AZ II · 1.16 pts / game - Roda JC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AZ II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Roda JC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
AZ II
Roda JC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).
Teams vs league
| AZ II | Liga | Roda JC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.65 | 3.21 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 59% | 62% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 64% | ▼ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 21% | • 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 92% | 77% | • 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 81% | 85% | • 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from AZ II's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Roda JC. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of AZ II vs Roda JC?
The Eerste Divisie match finished AZ II 2:0 Roda JC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before AZ II vs Roda JC?
AZ II score 1.59 goals per game on average and Roda JC 1.59. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 59% of AZ II's matches and 65% of Roda JC's.
What form are AZ II and Roda JC in?
Over the last 5 games AZ II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Roda JC 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AZ II vs Roda JC?
The statistical background for AZ II vs Roda JC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


