Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraChamazi StadiumData current as of 22 July 2026

Azam vs KMC: match statistics

Azam crest
Azam
3 : 0half-time 3:0
KMC crest
KMC

Azam vs KMC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Azam play KMC in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 25 May 2026 at 20:00. Venue: Chamazi Stadium. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Azam: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. KMC: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Azam scores 1.52 and concedes 0.41 goals per match. KMC scores 0.57 and concedes 1.75. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Azam 17%, KMC 32%. Over 2.5: Azam 34%, KMC 39%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Azam has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.21. Azam: 10.2 shots per match, KMC: 6.6.

Match halves

Azam: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.69. KMC: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.29.

Goals by minute

Azam: 31-45+ (11 goals). KMC: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Azam is the clear favorite in this matchup: at home they win 67% of matches and have 100% clean sheets (0 goals conceded per home match on average), while KMC has not recorded a single away win (0% wins and 92% losses). Offensively Azam averages 1.5 goals per home match with xG 1.88; in the last 5 matches they scored 9 goals (4 wins, 1 loss). KMC away scores only 0.67 goals per match, xG 1.14, and lost all last 5 away games, conceding 10 goals. The hosts create significantly more chances: 12.9 shots per home match and 4.5 on target with a 14% conversion rate, whereas KMC averages 7 shots with 2.67 on target and a 6% conversion, indicating higher finishing efficiency for Azam. Defensively the gap is also notable — Azam’s average xG against at home is 0.86, while KMC records xG against 1.38 away and concedes 2.08 goals per away match on average. Considering possession (58% vs 49%) and average points in the last 5 (2.4 for Azam vs 0 for KMC), a home victory is more likely.

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
AzamKMC
11Shots8
AzamKMC
3Shots on target0
AzamKMC
1.24xG0.76
AzamKMC
6Corners5
AzamKMC
46Dangerous attacks35
AzamKMC
6Fouls10
AzamKMC
0Cards0
AzamKMC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.52Goals scored / match0.57
AzamKMC
0.41Goals conceded / match1.75
AzamKMC
52%Average possession44%
AzamKMC
3.38Shots on target / match2.46
AzamKMC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.17Shots per match6.64
AzamKMC
3.38Shots on target2.46
AzamKMC
14.9%Shot conversion8.6%
AzamKMC
52%Possession44%
AzamKMC
1.56xG for1.21
AzamKMC
1.02xG against1.57
AzamKMC

Shooting quality

Azam: Efficient finishingKMC: Balanced
AzamKMC
Accuracy (shots on target)33%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Azam
WWLWW
Season result split
59% W34% R7% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-10-2
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-4-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
KMC
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
7% W11% R82% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-23
0.32 pts / match · goal difference -33
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-14
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Azam is 167% better for: goals scored per match.

1.52 goals / match - Azam · 0.57 goals / match - KMC

Azam is 327% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.41 goals / match - Azam · 1.75 goals / match - KMC

Azam scoring profile: very strong

Azam scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 28 matches).

KMC scoring profile: more difficult

KMC scores in 39% of matches (11 of 28 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 79% (23 of 29 matches).

44Goals scored (season)16
AzamKMC
12Goals conceded (season)49
AzamKMC
1.93Average goals in match2.32
AzamKMC
8Goals scored (last 5)3
AzamKMC
3Goals conceded (last 5)10
AzamKMC

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal39%
AzamKMC
59%2 goals14%
AzamKMC
21%3 goals4%
AzamKMC
0%4 goals0%
AzamKMC

How often they concede at least...

21%1 goal89%
AzamKMC
10%2 goals43%
AzamKMC
7%3 goals36%
AzamKMC
3%4 goals7%
AzamKMC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time18%
AzamKMC
0%BTTS in both halves7%
AzamKMC
24%Scored in both halves11%
AzamKMC

BTTS and goal count

10%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
AzamKMC
24%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
AzamKMC
0%BTTS - last 540%
AzamKMC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
AzamKMC
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
AzamKMC
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
AzamKMC

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
AzamKMC
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
AzamKMC
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
AzamKMC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Azam is 148% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.86 pts / match - Azam · 0.75 pts / match - KMC

Azam - half-time state
48% leading41% draw10% trailing
KMC - half-time state
11% leading43% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.86Points per match (1st half)0.75
AzamKMC
0.83Goals scored (1st half)0.29
AzamKMC
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.93
AzamKMC
1Average goals (1st half)1.21
AzamKMC
90%Clean sheet before half-time43%
AzamKMC
48%No goal before half-time71%
AzamKMC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.76Points per match (2nd half)0.68
AzamKMC
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.29
AzamKMC
0.24Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
AzamKMC
0.93Average goals (2nd half)1.07
AzamKMC
79%Clean sheet after half-time43%
AzamKMC
55%No goal after half-time79%
AzamKMC

Azam - second-half results

45% W41% R14% P
54
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KMC - second-half results

7% W46% R46% P
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-18
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding64%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 7%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Azam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
KMC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.6
Average goals in match1.80.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Azam
ScoredConceded
7
0
0-15
6
1
16-30
11
4
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
3
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

KMC
ScoredConceded
0
9
0-15
3
8
16-30
5
10
31-45
4
8
46-60
0
7
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-20.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

KMC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

AzamLigaKMC
Average goals in match 1.932.17 2.32
Both teams scored 17%35% 32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 34%39% 39%
Clean sheets 79%39% 11%
Goal before half-time 59%60% 68%
Goal after half-time 59%63% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Azam vs KMC?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Azam 3:0 KMC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Azam vs KMC?

Azam score 1.52 goals per game on average and KMC 0.57. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Azam's matches and 32% of KMC's.

What form are Azam and KMC in?

Over the last 5 games Azam have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and KMC 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Azam vs KMC?

The statistical background for Azam vs KMC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.