Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraChamazi StadiumData current as of September 07, 2026

Azam vs KMC: match statistics

Azam crest
Azam
3 : 0half-time 3:0
KMC crest
KMC

Azam vs KMC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Azam played against KMC in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on May 25, 2026. Venue: Chamazi Stadium. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

Azam has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. KMC has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Azam scores 1.43 goals per game and allows 0.39. KMC scores 0.59 and allows 1.64. Games in this league average 2.11 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 22% of Azam's games and 32% of KMC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 35% and 36%, compared with league averages of 35% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Azam has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.29 per game. Azam takes 10.0 shots per game, while KMC takes 6.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Azam leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.74 goals per game after halftime. KMC leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.32 after halftime.

When the teams score

Azam's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For KMC, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.11 goals. Both teams score in 35% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Azam is the clear favorite in this matchup: at home they win 67% of matches and have 100% clean sheets (0 goals conceded per home match on average), while KMC has not recorded a single away win (0% wins and 92% losses). Offensively Azam averages 1.5 goals per home match with xG 1.88; in the last 5 matches they scored 9 goals (4 wins, 1 loss). KMC away scores only 0.67 goals per match, xG 1.14, and lost all last 5 away games, conceding 10 goals. The hosts create significantly more chances: 12.9 shots per home match and 4.5 on target with a 14% conversion rate, whereas KMC averages 7 shots with 2.67 on target and a 6% conversion, indicating higher finishing efficiency for Azam. Defensively the gap is also notable — Azam’s average xG against at home is 0.86, while KMC records xG against 1.38 away and concedes 2.08 goals per away match on average. Considering possession (58% vs 49%) and average points in the last 5 (2.4 for Azam vs 0 for KMC), a home victory is more likely.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict No BTTS (both teams not to score) with a 70% probability because Azam have only 20% home games with both teams scoring this season and 20% in the last 5 — well below the league BTTS level of 34%. KMC have an away BTTS of 42% (last 5: 40%), but their away goals average is only 0.67 this season and 1.0 in the last 5, so the visitors often fail to score. Azam scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 per game) while conceding 0.8 in that period, whereas KMC conceded 10 goals in their last 5 (2.0 per game) — this suggests only the home side is likely to find the net. xG metrics confirm the home advantage: Azam xG_for 1.46 versus KMC xG_against_away 1.38, and KMC generate 1.14 xG with a shot conversion of 6%, which limits their realistic scoring chances. Considering these numbers and KMC's poor form (lllll), I assess 'No' at 70% versus 30% for 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project approximately 3.11 total goals in the match, with Azam around 1.64 goals and KMC around 1.47 goals. The basis is xG and form: Azam averages 1.46 xG per home match and 1.82 xG in the last 5 games, while KMC has attacking xG 1.14 for the season and 1.40 in the last 5; additionally KMC conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 per game). Seasonal data are mixed — Azam scored 33 and conceded 9 goals this season, season-long Over 2.5 for Azam is 20% versus 50% for KMC, but in the last 5 both teams have Over 2.5 at 40%. A Poisson model with lambda=3.11 estimates probabilities of Over 1.5 ≈82%, Over 2.5 ≈60% and Over 3.5 ≈38%. I back the Over on the 1.5 line as the strongest signal: Azam’s offensive edge in the last 5 (9 goals, xG 1.82) and KMC’s poor defense (36 conceded this season and 2.0 in the last 5) increase the likelihood of at least 2 goals in the match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Azam is in much better form: in the last 5 matches they have 4 wins (80% win rate), while KMC have lost all 5 games (100% defeats). At half-time Azam led in 60% of their last 5 matches (3 of 5) and have an average goals at the break of 1.0 versus 0.2 for KMC, which gives a strong signal for the home side to lead at the break. For the full match the statistics also favor Azam: average goals in the last 5 matches are 1.8 for Azam versus 1.0 for KMC, and average goals conceded are 0.8 vs 2.0, suggesting an advantage in goal difference. Additionally, the home side’s xG is 1.46 compared to 1.14 for KMC, and average shots on target are 3.5 versus 2.67, increasing the likelihood that Azam will hold their lead and win. Therefore the safest HT/FT pick is 1/1 (home leading at half-time and winning), and I assign the highest probability to this scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

3 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

60Possession (%)40
AzamKMC
11Shots8
AzamKMC
3Shots on target0
AzamKMC
1.24xG0.76
AzamKMC
6Corners5
AzamKMC
46Dangerous attacks35
AzamKMC
6Fouls10
AzamKMC
0Cards0
AzamKMC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.43Goals scored / game0.59
AzamKMC
0.39Goals allowed / game1.64
AzamKMC
50%Average possession43%
AzamKMC
3.17Shots on target / game2.55
AzamKMC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.96Shots per game6.68
AzamKMC
3.17Shots on target2.55
AzamKMC
14.4%Shot conversion8.8%
AzamKMC
50%Possession43%
AzamKMC
1.58xG for1.29
AzamKMC
1.01xG against1.61
AzamKMC

Shooting quality

Azam: Efficient finishingKMC: Balanced
AzamKMC
Accuracy (shots on target)32%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Azam
WWLWW
Season result split
52% W43% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-4-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
KMC
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
9% W14% R77% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-17
0.41 pts / game · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-11
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.90BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Azam is 142% better for: goals scored per game.

1.43 goals / game - Azam · 0.59 goals / game - KMC

Azam is 321% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.39 goals / game - Azam · 1.64 goals / game - KMC

Azam scoring profile: very strong

Azam scores in 70% of games (16 of 23 meczów), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 meczów).

KMC scoring profile: more difficult

KMC scores in 41% of games (9 of 22 meczów), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 78% (18 of 23 meczów).

33Goals scored (season)13
AzamKMC
9Goals conceded (season)36
AzamKMC
1.83Average goals per game2.23
AzamKMC
9Goals scored (last 5)5
AzamKMC
4Goals conceded (last 5)10
AzamKMC

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal41%
AzamKMC
52%2 goals14%
AzamKMC
22%3 goals5%
AzamKMC
0%4 goals0%
AzamKMC

How often they concede at least...

22%1 goal86%
AzamKMC
9%2 goals36%
AzamKMC
4%3 goals32%
AzamKMC
4%4 goals9%
AzamKMC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time14%
AzamKMC
0%BTTS in both halves5%
AzamKMC
26%Scored in both halves9%
AzamKMC

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
AzamKMC
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
AzamKMC
20%BTTS - last 540%
AzamKMC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
AzamKMC
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
AzamKMC
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
AzamKMC

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
AzamKMC
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
AzamKMC
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
AzamKMC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Azam is 96% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.78 pts / game - Azam · 0.91 pts / game - KMC

Azam - half-time state
43% leading48% draw9% trailing
KMC - half-time state
14% leading50% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.78Points per game (1st half)0.91
AzamKMC
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.27
AzamKMC
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
AzamKMC
0.87Average goals (1st half)1
AzamKMC
91%Clean sheet before half-time50%
AzamKMC
52%No goal before half-time73%
AzamKMC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.83Points per game (2nd half)0.68
AzamKMC
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)0.32
AzamKMC
0.22Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
AzamKMC
0.96Average goals (2nd half)1.18
AzamKMC
78%Clean sheet after half-time41%
AzamKMC
52%No goal after half-time77%
AzamKMC

Azam - second-half results

48% W39% R13% P
41
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KMC - second-half results

9% W41% R50% P
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding64%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 9%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Azam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.00
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.61.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
KMC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.80
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Azam
ScoredConceded
6
0
0-15
5
1
16-30
5
3
31-45
8
2
46-60
5
2
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

KMC
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
7
31-45
4
6
46-60
0
7
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.02
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

KMC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

AzamLigaKMC
Average goals per game 1.832.11 2.23
Both teams scored 22%35% 32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%38% 36%
Clean sheets 78%40% 14%
Goal before half-time 52%57% 64%
Goal after half-time 61%62% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.11
Average goals per game
35%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / game
0.82
Away goals / game
+56%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defensive advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Faisal Salum⚽ 2
Iddy Seleman NadoA 1
Yoro Mamadou Diaby⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AzamGoalFaisal Salum
  2. AzamGoalFaisal SalumAssist: Iddy Seleman Nado
  3. AzamGoalYoro Mamadou Diaby

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Azam vs KMC?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Azam 3:0 KMC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Azam vs KMC?

Azam score 1.43 goals per game on average and KMC 0.59. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Azam's matches and 32% of KMC's.

What form are Azam and KMC in?

Over the last 5 games Azam have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and KMC 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Azam vs KMC?

The statistical background for Azam vs KMC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.