Azam vs Namungo: match statistics
Azam vs Namungo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Azam play Namungo in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 5 May 2026 at 17:30. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Azam: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Namungo: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Azam scores 1.52 and concedes 0.41 goals per match. Namungo scores 0.86 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Azam 17%, Namungo 48%. Over 2.5: Azam 34%, Namungo 24%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Azam has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.33. Azam: 10.2 shots per match, Namungo: 8.9.
Match halves
Azam: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.69. Namungo: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.45.
Goals by minute
Azam: 31-45+ (11 goals). Namungo: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Azam, playing at home, statistically dominates: at home they have 56% wins, 44% draws and 0% losses this season, averaging 1.44 goals scored per match and conceding 0.0 (100% clean sheets). Namungo sit 10th and away have only 10% wins, 40% draws and 50% losses; as visitors they average 0.6 goals scored and concede 1.3. Form favors the hosts — in the last 5 matches Azam won 3 and drew 2, scoring 8 and conceding 1, while Namungo in their last 5 have 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses with a 4-8 goal record; average points in the last 5 are 2.2 for Azam versus 0.6 for Namungo. Azam creates clearly better chances: home xG 1.78 vs Namungo away xG 1.04, hosts average 4.43 shots on target and 12.71 attempts per match compared to 2.4 on target and 6.3 attempts for the visitors, with conversion rates 15% vs 10%. Considering the hosts’ flawless defence (0.0 goals conceded at home) and superiority in chance quality and possession (57% vs 48%), I predict an Azam win; therefore I assign 65% to the home side, 25% to a draw and 10% to an away win for Namungo.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Azam | Namungo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Azam is 33% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Azam · 1.8 pts / match - Namungo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Azam is 77% better for: goals scored per match.
1.52 goals / match - Azam · 0.86 goals / match - Namungo
Azam is 161% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.41 goals / match - Azam · 1.07 goals / match - Namungo
Azam scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).
Namungo scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 79% (23 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Azam
Over / Under — Namungo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Azam is 74% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.86 pts / match - Azam · 1.07 pts / match - Namungo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Azam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Namungo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Azam
Namungo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Azam | Liga | Namungo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.93 | 2.17 | ▼ 1.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 17% | 35% | ▲ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 34% | 39% | ▼ 24% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 79% | 39% | ▼ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | • 59% | 60% | • 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 59% | 63% | ▲ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Azam 0 - 1 - 0 Namungo. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Azam vs Namungo?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Azam 1:0 Namungo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Azam vs Namungo?
Azam score 1.52 goals per game on average and Namungo 0.86. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Azam's matches and 48% of Namungo's.
What form are Azam and Namungo in?
Over the last 5 games Azam have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Namungo 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Azam vs Namungo?
The statistical background for Azam vs Namungo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.