Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Azam vs Simba: match statistics
Azam vs Simba: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Azam plays Simba in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Chamazi Stadium.
Recent form
Azam has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Simba has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Azam scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 0.83. Simba scores 1.80 and allows 0.40. Games in this league average 2.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Azam's games and 40% of Simba's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 40%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Azam has the higher season xG average, 1.90 to 1.71 per game. Azam takes 11.8 shots per game, while Simba takes 8.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Azam leads at halftime in 67% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Simba leads at halftime in 60% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Azam's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Simba, it is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.48 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Azam | Simba | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 55% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Simba is 15% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Azam · 3 pts / game - Simba
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Simba is 107% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.83 goals / game - Azam · 0.4 goals / game - Simba
Azam scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 games), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 games).
Simba scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Azam
Over / Under - Simba
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Azam is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.33 pts / game - Azam · 2.2 pts / game - Simba
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Azam - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Simba - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Azam
Simba
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Azam | Liga | Simba | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.67 | 2.48 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 48% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 42% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 27% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 75% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 71% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Azam's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Simba. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.