Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Azam vs Young Africans: match statistics
Azam vs Young Africans: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Azam plays Young Africans in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Recent form
Azam has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Young Africans has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Azam scores 1.58 goals per game and allows 0.33. Young Africans scores 2.50 and allows 0.17. Games in this league average 1.94 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 25% of Azam's games and 17% of Young Africans's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 50%, compared with league averages of 31% for BTTS and 31% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Young Africans has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.42 per game. Azam takes 8.8 shots per game, while Young Africans takes 7.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Azam leads at halftime in 58% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Young Africans leads at halftime in 42% and scores 1.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Azam's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). For Young Africans, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 1.94 goals. Both teams score in 31% of games, and 31% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Azam | Young Africans | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.22 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.51 | 0.77 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Young Africans is 18% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Azam · 2.6 pts / game - Young Africans
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Young Africans is 58% better for: goals scored per game.
1.58 goals / game - Azam · 2.5 goals / game - Young Africans
Young Africans is 94% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.33 goals / game - Azam · 0.17 goals / game - Young Africans
Azam scores in 75% of games (9 of 12 meczów), while Young Africans keeps a clean sheet in 83% (10 of 12 meczów).
Young Africans scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 meczów), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 75% (9 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Azam
Over / Under - Young Africans
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Azam is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.08 pts / game - Azam · 1.83 pts / game - Young Africans
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Azam - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 58% of games and wins 50%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Young Africans - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 83%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +8 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Azam
Young Africans
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Azam | Liga | Young Africans | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.92 | 1.94 | ▲ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 31% | ▼ 17% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 31% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 75% | 42% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 51% | ▲ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 60% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.