Faroe Islands - Faroe Islands Premier LeagueData current as of September 06, 2026

B36 vs KÍ: match statistics

B36 crest
B36
1 : 1half-time 1:0
KÍ crest

B36 vs KÍ: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

B36 played against KÍ in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The game was played on May 9, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

B36 has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. KÍ has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

B36 scores 2.13 goals per game and allows 0.50. KÍ scores 2.00 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.51 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 38% of B36's games and 50% of KÍ's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 25%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KÍ has the higher season xG average, 1.80 to 1.58 per game. B36 takes 13.3 shots per game, while KÍ takes 14.0.

First-half and second-half trends

B36 leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.50 goals per game after halftime. KÍ leads at halftime in 63% and scores 0.88 after halftime.

When the teams score

B36's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For KÍ, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Faroe Islands Premier League games average 2.51 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorite is B36, who win 75% of matches at home and keep 75% clean sheets, averaging 2.5 goals scored and only 0.25 conceded per home game. Over the whole season B36 have 17 goals compared to KÍ's 16, and in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 11 goals (4W,1L) while KÍ have 12 goals with a 3W,2D record. KÍ away average is 2.0 goals scored and 0.5 conceded; their away xG is 2.34 and they register on average 7.75 shots on target per game, indicating a higher volume of quality chances. xG analysis shows KÍ generate more expected goals (2.34 vs 1.78 for B36), but B36 are more efficient in finishing (16% conversion at home vs 11% for KÍ) and defend real shots significantly better (0.25 conceded goals vs 0.5 for KÍ). Therefore I assign higher chances to the hosts: 60% for a B36 win, 20% for a draw and 20% for a KÍ win, mainly due to the combination of home efficiency (2.5 goals and 16% conversion) and the hosts’ defensive resilience (75% clean sheets).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I recommend No BTTS due to the strong defensive profiles of both teams: each side concedes only 0.5 goals per game this season and has a 50% clean sheet rate, while the league-wide clean sheet rate is as high as 68%. KÍ concedes 0.2 goals on average in the last 5 matches (1 goal in 5) while scoring 2.4, whereas B36 concedes 0.8 and scores 2.2, indicating visitors rarely allow opponents to score. Although KÍ generates more chances (xG 2.34 vs 1.27 for B36 and 19.0 shots vs 9.0), KÍ’s xG against over the last 5 matches is only 0.66 versus 1.25 against B36, which reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. Additionally, the seasonal BTTS rate for both teams is 50% (league 48%), and the league average goals per game is only 2.5, so the numerical balance and high clean sheet percentage point to a stronger signal for "No".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model based on xG and shooting statistics indicates a goals edge: xG is 1.07 for B36 and 1.58 for KÍ, totaling 2.65 expected goals, which according to a Poisson distribution gives ~74% probability of Over 1.5 goals and ~49% probability of Over 2.5 goals. KÍ generates heavy pressure with 19 shots and 7.75 on target per match versus B36’s 9 and 3.5, and despite lower conversion (11% vs 22%) KÍ’s xG = 2.34 shows a real ability to create chances. Both teams average 2.0 goals scored and 0.5 conceded season-to-date, and in the last 5 rounds they have scored 11 and 12 and conceded 4 and 1 respectively, indicating an uptick in scoring form. Seasonal over1.5 rates are 50% for B36 and 75% for KÍ, so historically at least one side often delivers more than 1.5 goals; therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is B36 leading at half-time and the hosts winning the match (1/1): the hosts led at the break in 3 of 4 cases (leadingAtHT_home 3, 75.0%) and average 1.25 goals by HT with 0.0 conceded (scoredAVGHT_home 1.25, concededAVGHT_home 0.0; seasonCSPercentageHT_home 100.0%). KÍ averages 1.0 goal by HT and concedes 0.25 (scoredAVGHT_away 1.0, concededAVGHT_away 0.25), so the hosts hold a first-half advantage of 1.25 vs 1.0. Over the full match both teams average 2.0 goals (seasonScoredAVG_home 2.0 and seasonScoredAVG_away 2.0), but the visitors create more chances (xG_for_avg_away 2.34 vs xG_for_avg_home 1.27 and 7.75 shots on target vs 3.5). Despite the visitors’ higher xG, B36 compensates with a much higher finishing efficiency (shot_conversion_rate_home 22% vs 11%), therefore I assign the highest probability to 1/1 (45%), with lower chances for a draw or a visitor turnaround (e.g. X/X 15%, 1/2 10%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

42Possession (%)58
B36
11Shots21
B36
4Shots on target5
B36
1.44xG2.25
B36
4Corners11
B36
64Dangerous attacks82
B36
8Fouls7
B36
0Cards1
B36

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.13Goals scored / game2
B36
0.5Goals allowed / game0.5
B36
56%Average possession62%
B36
4Shots on target / game5.63
B36

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.25Shots per game14
B36
4Shots on target5.63
B36
16%Shot conversion14.3%
B36
56%Possession62%
B36
1.58xG for1.8
B36
1.17xG against0.85
B36

Shooting quality

B36: Efficient finishing: Dominant
B36
Accuracy (shots on target)30%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.530.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

B36
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
63% W38% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-0
2.25 pts / game · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
WWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-0
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 away
2-2-0
WDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 0.73BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

B36 is 6% better for: goals scored per game.

2.13 goals / game - B36 · 2 goals / game - KÍ

B36 scoring profile: strong

B36 scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 meczów).

KÍ scoring profile: mixed

KÍ scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while B36 keeps a clean sheet in 63% (5 of 8 meczów).

17Goals scored (season)16
B36
4Goals conceded (season)4
B36
2.63Average goals per game2.5
B36
9Goals scored (last 5)10
B36
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
B36

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
B36
63%2 goals38%
B36
25%3 goals25%
B36
25%4 goals25%
B36

How often they concede at least...

38%1 goal50%
B36
13%2 goals0%
B36
0%3 goals0%
B36
0%4 goals0%
B36

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time0%
B36
13%BTTS in both halves0%
B36
38%Scored in both halves25%
B36

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
B36
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
B36
40%BTTS - last 540%
B36

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

38%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
B36
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
B36
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
B36

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
B36
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
B36
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
B36

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KÍ is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - B36 · 2.13 pts / game - KÍ

B36 - half-time state
25% leading75% draw0% trailing
KÍ - half-time state
63% leading25% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)2.13
B36
0.63Goals scored (1st half)1.13
B36
0.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.13
B36
0.88Average goals (1st half)1.25
B36
75%Clean sheet before half-time88%
B36
63%No goal before half-time38%
B36

After half-time (2nd half)

2.25Points per game (2nd half)1.63
B36
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
B36
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
B36
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.25
B36
75%Clean sheet after half-time63%
B36
25%No goal after half-time63%
B36

B36 - second-half results

63% W38% R0% P
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding252%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KÍ - second-half results

38% W50% R13% P
17
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at halftime in 63% of games and wins 50%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

B36 - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.20
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
KÍ - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.80
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game1.41.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

B36
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
0
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
5
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.56
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

B36

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.67
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
146%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.95
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
190%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
34%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).

Teams vs league

B36Liga
Average goals per game 2.632.51 2.50
Both teams scored 38%49% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%46% 25%
Clean sheets 63%33% 50%
Goal before half-time 38%61% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%78% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / game
1.05
Away goals / game
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Yellow cardJean Carlos de Brito
  2. B36SubstitutionOn: Börge PetersenOff: Heini Vatnsdal
  3. SubstitutionOn: Jonn JohannesenOff: Filip Brattbakk
  4. SubstitutionOn: Erlend HustadOff: Páll Klettskard

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from B36's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against . Games average 3.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

B36 Tórshavn
0 : 3
KÍ Klaksvík
KÍ Klaksvík
2 : 1
B36 Tórshavn
B36 Tórshavn
1 : 3
KÍ Klaksvík

FAQ

What was the result of B36 vs KÍ?

The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished B36 1:1 KÍ. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between B36 and KÍ?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches B36 won 0, KÍ won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before B36 vs KÍ?

B36 score 2.13 goals per game on average and KÍ 2.00. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 38% of B36's matches and 50% of KÍ's.

What form are B36 and KÍ in?

Over the last 5 games B36 have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and KÍ 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for B36 vs KÍ?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for B36 vs KÍ: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.