Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Bahardar play Fasil Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 24 December 2025 at 14:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Bahardar: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Fasil Ketema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Bahardar scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. Fasil Ketema scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Bahardar 32%, Fasil Ketema 26%. Over 2.5: Bahardar 18%, Fasil Ketema 18%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Bahardar has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.14. Bahardar: 8.3 shots per match, Fasil Ketema: 7.2.

Match halves

Bahardar: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.53. Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Bahardar: 46-60 (8 goals). Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
BahardarFasil Ketema
18Shots24
BahardarFasil Ketema
5Shots on target7
BahardarFasil Ketema
1.82xG2.44
BahardarFasil Ketema
2Corners4
BahardarFasil Ketema
47Dangerous attacks62
BahardarFasil Ketema
16Fouls14
BahardarFasil Ketema
0Cards0
BahardarFasil Ketema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

BahardarFasil Ketema
0.74Goals scored / match0.74
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.74Goals conceded / match0.74
BahardarFasil Ketema
51%Average possession46%
BahardarFasil Ketema
2.84Shots on target / match2.24
BahardarFasil Ketema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.26Shots per match7.24
BahardarFasil Ketema
2.84Shots on target2.24
BahardarFasil Ketema
8.9%Shot conversion10.2%
BahardarFasil Ketema
51%Possession46%
BahardarFasil Ketema
1.26xG for1.14
BahardarFasil Ketema
1.2xG against1.1
BahardarFasil Ketema

Shooting quality

Bahardar: BalancedFasil Ketema: Balanced
BahardarFasil Ketema
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Bahardar · 1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Bahardar
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W55% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-21-8
1.26 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-10-5
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Fasil Ketema
LWWLW
Season result split
37% W34% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-13-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-9-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bahardar scoring profile: more difficult

Bahardar scores in 47% of matches (18 of 38 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: mixed

Fasil Ketema scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 53% (20 of 38 matches).

28Goals scored (season)28
BahardarFasil Ketema
28Goals conceded (season)28
BahardarFasil Ketema
1.47Average goals in match1.47
BahardarFasil Ketema
2Goals scored (last 5)4
BahardarFasil Ketema
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
BahardarFasil Ketema

How often they score at least...

47%1 goal58%
BahardarFasil Ketema
24%2 goals11%
BahardarFasil Ketema
3%3 goals5%
BahardarFasil Ketema
0%4 goals0%
BahardarFasil Ketema

How often they concede at least...

47%1 goal45%
BahardarFasil Ketema
21%2 goals21%
BahardarFasil Ketema
5%3 goals8%
BahardarFasil Ketema
0%4 goals0%
BahardarFasil Ketema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time8%
BahardarFasil Ketema
0%BTTS in both halves3%
BahardarFasil Ketema
8%Scored in both halves8%
BahardarFasil Ketema

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS16%
BahardarFasil Ketema
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
BahardarFasil Ketema
20%BTTS - last 50%
BahardarFasil Ketema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

39%Min. 1 goal before half-time34%
BahardarFasil Ketema
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
BahardarFasil Ketema
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
BahardarFasil Ketema

2nd half

47%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
BahardarFasil Ketema
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
BahardarFasil Ketema
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
BahardarFasil Ketema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Bahardar · 1.42 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Bahardar - half-time state
11% leading68% draw21% trailing
Fasil Ketema - half-time state
24% leading71% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.42
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.21Goals scored (1st half)0.32
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.13
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.61Average goals (1st half)0.45
BahardarFasil Ketema
71%Clean sheet before half-time87%
BahardarFasil Ketema
79%No goal before half-time71%
BahardarFasil Ketema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.39Points per match (2nd half)1.18
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.34Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
BahardarFasil Ketema
0.87Average goals (2nd half)1.03
BahardarFasil Ketema
71%Clean sheet after half-time63%
BahardarFasil Ketema
66%No goal after half-time63%
BahardarFasil Ketema

Bahardar - second-half results

26% W61% R13% P
38
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding218%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
54
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Bahardar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Bahardar
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
6
16-30
5
6
31-45
8
3
46-60
5
4
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
6
0
31-45
3
9
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.48
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
83%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Bahardar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

BahardarLigaFasil Ketema
Average goals in match 1.471.78 1.47
Both teams scored 32%40% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 18%28% 18%
Clean sheets 53%40% 55%
Goal before half-time 39%56% 34%
Goal after half-time 47%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Bahardar 1 - 0 - 0 Fasil Ketema. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Bahardar 0:0 Fasil Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema?

Bahardar score 0.74 goals per game on average and Fasil Ketema 0.74. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Bahardar's matches and 26% of Fasil Ketema's.

What form are Bahardar and Fasil Ketema in?

Over the last 5 games Bahardar have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Fasil Ketema 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema?

The statistical background for Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.