Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema: match statistics
Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Bahardar played against Fasil Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The game was played on December 24, 2025. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Bahardar has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Fasil Ketema has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Bahardar scores 0.90 goals per game and allows 0.90. Fasil Ketema scores 0.90 and allows 0.30. Games in this league average 1.80 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Bahardar's games and 30% of Fasil Ketema's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 0%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 28% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Fasil Ketema has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 1.22 per game. Bahardar takes 8.0 shots per game, while Fasil Ketema takes 7.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Bahardar leads at halftime in 10% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Fasil Ketema leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Bahardar's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For Fasil Ketema, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ethiopia Premier League games average 1.80 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 28% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Bahardar | Fasil Ketema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Fasil Ketema is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Bahardar · 1.8 pts / game - Fasil Ketema
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fasil Ketema is 200% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.9 goals / game - Bahardar · 0.3 goals / game - Fasil Ketema
Bahardar scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 meczów), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 70% (7 of 10 meczów).
Fasil Ketema scores in 80% of games (8 of 10 meczów), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 50% (5 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bahardar
Over / Under - Fasil Ketema
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fasil Ketema is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - Bahardar · 1.6 pts / game - Fasil Ketema
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bahardar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Fasil Ketema - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Bahardar
Fasil Ketema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Bahardar | Liga | Fasil Ketema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.80 | 1.80 | ▼ 1.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 44% | ▼ 30% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 30% | 28% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 37% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 30% | 58% | ▼ 40% |
| Goal after half-time | • 60% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Bahardar 0:0 Fasil Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema?
Bahardar score 0.90 goals per game on average and Fasil Ketema 0.90. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Bahardar's matches and 30% of Fasil Ketema's.
What form are Bahardar and Fasil Ketema in?
Over the last 5 games Bahardar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Fasil Ketema 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema?
The statistical background for Bahardar vs Fasil Ketema — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.