Bali United vs Persijap: match statistics
Bali United, despite weak form in the last five matches (0 wins), holds an advantage in home games with 45% clean sheets and a solid xG coefficient (1.55). Persijap presents catastrophic away statistics – 80% losses, zero clean sheets, and a goal difference of -16, making them one of the weakest teams on the road in the league. Although the guests show better form in the last five matches overall (1.8 PPG), their streak of ten away matches without a win and an average of 2.3 goals conceded per away match significantly lower their chances. Bali United, playing before their own crowd and having the possession advantage (51%), should exploit Persijap's defensive weaknesses. A draw is a realistic option due to Bali United's high percentage of draws at home (45%), yet the hosts' advantage in key statistics speaks for their victory.
Bali United vs Persijap: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Bali United played against Persijap in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on February 28, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Bali United has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Persijap has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Bali United scores 1.41 goals per game and allows 1.41. Persijap scores 0.91 and allows 1.77. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 55% of Bali United's games and 55% of Persijap's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 59%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Bali United has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.43 per game. Bali United takes 12.9 shots per game, while Persijap takes 11.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Bali United leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.95 goals per game after halftime. Persijap leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.64 after halftime.
When the teams score
Bali United's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Persijap, it is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 1 games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Bali United, despite weak form in the last five matches (0 wins), holds an advantage in home games with 45% clean sheets and a solid xG coefficient (1.55). Persijap presents catastrophic away statistics – 80% losses, zero clean sheets, and a goal difference of -16, making them one of the weakest teams on the road in the league. Although the guests show better form in the last five matches overall (1.8 PPG), their streak of ten away matches without a win and an average of 2.3 goals conceded per away match significantly lower their chances. Bali United, playing before their own crowd and having the possession advantage (51%), should exploit Persijap's defensive weaknesses. A draw is a realistic option due to Bali United's high percentage of draws at home (45%), yet the hosts' advantage in key statistics speaks for their victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Bali United | Persijap | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Persijap is 350% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Bali United · 1.8 pts / game - Persijap
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bali United is 55% better for: goals scored per game.
1.41 goals / game - Bali United · 0.91 goals / game - Persijap
Bali United is 26% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.41 goals / game - Bali United · 1.77 goals / game - Persijap
Bali United scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 meczów), while Persijap keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 meczów).
Persijap scores in 64% of games (14 of 22 meczów), while Bali United keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bali United
Over / Under - Persijap
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bali United is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / game - Bali United · 0.82 pts / game - Persijap
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bali United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Persijap - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Bali United
Persijap
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Bali United | Liga | Persijap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.82 | 2.66 | • 2.68 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 53% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 51% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 26% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 70% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | • 82% | 82% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Bali United's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Persijap. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Bali United vs Persijap?
The Liga 1 match finished Bali United 0:0 Persijap. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bali United vs Persijap?
Bali United score 1.41 goals per game on average and Persijap 0.91. The Liga 1 average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Bali United's matches and 55% of Persijap's.
What form are Bali United and Persijap in?
Over the last 5 games Bali United have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Persijap 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bali United vs Persijap?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.