Banants vs Alashkert: match statistics
Banants vs Alashkert: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Banants play Alashkert in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:4.
Current form
Banants: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Alashkert: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Banants scores 1.59 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. Alashkert scores 1.56 and concedes 0.85. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Banants 41%, Alashkert 48%. Over 2.5: Banants 41%, Alashkert 41%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Alashkert has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.31. Banants: 10.9 shots per match, Alashkert: 11.2.
Match halves
Banants: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.93. Alashkert: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.70.
Goals by minute
Banants: 76-90+ (12 goals). Alashkert: 0-15 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Armenian Premier League: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Banants holds a clear offensive advantage and superior form: they have scored 38 goals this season versus 30 by Alashkert, and in the last 5 matches have 10 goals compared to the visitors' 6. At home Banants averages 2.56 goals per game and 5.11 shots on target with a conversion rate of 22%, while Alashkert away records 1.5 goals per game, 3.9 shots on target and a 14% conversion. Defensively the hosts are stronger: Banants concedes 0.89 goals at home and keeps 44% clean sheets, whereas Alashkert concedes 1.2 goals away and has only 10% clean sheets. The xG of both teams is similar (Banants xG 1.43 vs Alashkert xG 1.35), but Banants' higher finishing efficiency and better points return in the last 5 matches (2.0 points per game vs 1.4) favor a home win. Therefore I tip a Banants victory and estimate probabilities of 65% for the hosts, 20% for a draw and 15% for an Alashkert win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Banants | Alashkert | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Alashkert is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Banants · 2.2 pts / match - Alashkert
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Alashkert is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.96 goals / match - Banants · 0.85 goals / match - Alashkert
Banants scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Alashkert keeps a clean sheet in 37% (10 of 27 matches).
Alashkert scores in 85% of matches (23 of 27 matches), while Banants keeps a clean sheet in 48% (13 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Banants
Over / Under — Alashkert
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Banants - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Alashkert - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Banants
Alashkert
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Banants | Liga | Alashkert | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.56 | 2.56 | ▼ 2.41 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 44% | ▲ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 46% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 33% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 69% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | • 78% | 78% | • 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Banants 1 - 0 - 1 Alashkert. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Banants vs Alashkert?
The Armenian Premier League match finished Banants 0:4 Alashkert. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Banants and Alashkert?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Banants won 1, Alashkert won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Banants vs Alashkert?
Banants score 1.59 goals per game on average and Alashkert 1.56. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Banants's matches and 48% of Alashkert's.
What form are Banants and Alashkert in?
Over the last 5 games Banants have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Alashkert 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banants vs Alashkert?
The statistical background for Banants vs Alashkert — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.