Banfield vs Tigre: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match with a slight edge for a draw. Banfield displays solid home form with a 50% win rate and a positive goal difference (+3) at their own stadium; however, their last five overall matches show weaker performance (1.2 points per game). Tigre boasts a better seasonal record (4 wins, 5 draws) and a higher shot conversion rate (13%), but they play cautiously away, drawing half of their matches and averaging just 0.8 points per game in their last five outings. Both teams are characterized by similar goal averages (2.5 goals per match) and xG, suggesting tactical balance. Considering Tigre's draw-oriented form (4 of their last 5 matches ended in draws) and Banfield's home effectiveness, the most likely scenario is a share of the points.
Banfield vs Tigre: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Banfield played against Tigre in Primera División (Argentina). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Banfield has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Tigre has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Banfield scores 1.10 goals per game and allows 1.30. Tigre scores 1.60 and allows 0.90. Games in this league average 2.02 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Banfield's games and 70% of Tigre's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 40%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tigre has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.34 per game. Banfield takes 11.6 shots per game, while Tigre takes 12.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Banfield leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Tigre leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.90 after halftime.
When the teams score
Banfield's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Tigre, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Primera División games average 2.02 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match with a slight edge for a draw. Banfield displays solid home form with a 50% win rate and a positive goal difference (+3) at their own stadium; however, their last five overall matches show weaker performance (1.2 points per game). Tigre boasts a better seasonal record (4 wins, 5 draws) and a higher shot conversion rate (13%), but they play cautiously away, drawing half of their matches and averaging just 0.8 points per game in their last five outings. Both teams are characterized by similar goal averages (2.5 goals per match) and xG, suggesting tactical balance. Considering Tigre's draw-oriented form (4 of their last 5 matches ended in draws) and Banfield's home effectiveness, the most likely scenario is a share of the points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Banfield | Tigre | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Banfield is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Banfield · 0.8 pts / game - Tigre
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tigre is 45% better for: goals scored per game.
1.1 goals / game - Banfield · 1.6 goals / game - Tigre
Tigre is 44% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.3 goals / game - Banfield · 0.9 goals / game - Tigre
Banfield scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 meczów), while Tigre keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 meczów).
Tigre scores in 90% of games (9 of 10 meczów), while Banfield keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Banfield
Over / Under - Tigre
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tigre is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Banfield · 1.9 pts / game - Tigre
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Banfield - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Tigre - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 40%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Banfield
Tigre
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Banfield | Liga | Tigre | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.40 | 2.02 | ▲ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 33% | ▲ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 34% | ▼ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 58% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Banfield's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Tigre. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Banfield vs Tigre?
The Primera División match finished Banfield 1:0 Tigre. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Banfield and Tigre?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Banfield won 2, Tigre won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Banfield vs Tigre?
Banfield score 1.10 goals per game on average and Tigre 1.60. The Primera División average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Banfield's matches and 70% of Tigre's.
What form are Banfield and Tigre in?
Over the last 5 games Banfield have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Tigre 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banfield vs Tigre?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Banfield vs Tigre: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.