Lithuania - A LygaData current as of September 05, 2026

Banga vs Kauno Žalgiris: match statistics

Banga crest
Banga
2 : 2half-time 2:1
Kauno Žalgiris crest
Kauno Žalgiris

Banga vs Kauno Žalgiris: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Banga played against Kauno Žalgiris in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on May 1, 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

Banga has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Kauno Žalgiris has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Banga scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 0.70. Kauno Žalgiris scores 2.80 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.40 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 30% of Banga's games and 40% of Kauno Žalgiris's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 80%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kauno Žalgiris has the higher season xG average, 1.72 to 1.36 per game. Banga takes 12.2 shots per game, while Kauno Žalgiris takes 14.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Banga leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Kauno Žalgiris leads at halftime in 60% and scores 1.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

Banga's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Kauno Žalgiris, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

A Lyga games average 2.40 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 0.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The visitors, Kauno Žalgiris, are clear favorites — reflected by their 1st place and a season record of 8 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss compared to Banga’s 4 wins, 2 draws, 4 losses. Recent form also favors the visitors: Kauno Žalgiris have scored 16 goals and won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Banga have 9 goals and recorded 3 wins and 2 draws in their last five. Offensively the visitors dominate the metrics — 28 goals this season (avg. 3.0 away), 13.75 shots per match and 6.5 shots on target with a 22% conversion rate, versus Banga at home: 12 goals, 11.8 shots per match, 4.2 shots on target and 15% conversion. Quality of chances is supported by xG: visitors have xG 1.72 away vs 1.31 for the hosts, and defensively Kauno Žalgiris concede on average 0.5 goals away with 50% clean sheets, while Banga concede 0.8 at home with 20% clean sheets; additionally the visitors have no matches without scoring (0%), whereas the hosts failed to score in 40% of games. Considering the goal margin (28 vs 12), superior chance quality and efficiency, and the visitors’ 100% away win rate, I estimate Kauno Žalgiris win probability at ~65%, draw 15% and Banga win 20%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistics favor the “no” scenario (one of the teams fails to score): both teams concede only 0.5 goals per match on average this season, and the league has a high clean sheet rate of 76%. Banga keeps a clean sheet in 67% of matches this season, Kauno Žalgiris in 50%, increasing the likelihood that at least one side won’t score. Additionally, Kauno Žalgiris have only 20% BTTS in their last 5 matches, concede on average 0.4 goals and score on average 3.2 goals (16 goals in 5 matches), which more often results in one-sided scorelines than mutual scoring. A counter signal comes from Banga with 60% BTTS in their last 5 matches and an average of 1.8 goals scored, and both teams have season xG of 1.72, so the risk of both teams scoring exists but is weaker than the tendency toward clean sheets. Based on this, I recommend a “no” (No Goal) with 70% probability and “yes” (BTTS - Yes) at 30%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams show strong offensive potential: Banga averages 2.67 goals at home, Kauno Žalgiris scores 3.00 goals away, and both teams have xG of 1.72 each (3.44 xG combined). Models based on 3.44 xG give roughly an 86% probability of Over 1.5 goals and about 67% for Over 2.5 goals, which aligns with seasonal Over2.5 rates (67% for Banga, 100% for Kauno Žalgiris). In the last 5 matches Banga averaged 1.8 goals, Kauno Žalgiris 3.2 (5.0 goals combined), and average shots on target 5.83 vs 6.5 with conversion rates of 18%/22% further support goals. Although both teams officially concede only 0.5 goals on average, opponent xG are 1.01 and 1.18, suggesting a higher likelihood of conceding than clean sheet rates imply (Banga 67% CS). Given the highest probability and relatively low risk, I pick Over 1.5 (ou_pred_line 1.5) as the strongest betting signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back HT/FT 1/2: home team leading at the break, but visitors taking the final win. This season Banga led at half-time in 4 of 6 matches (67%), averaging 1.5 goals by the break and conceding only 0.17 goals before half-time, scoring a total of 10 first-half goals versus 6 for opponents. Meanwhile Kauno Žalgiris has a 100% win rate this season, scores on average 3.0 goals per match versus the hosts’ 2.67, and features better shot conversion (22% vs 18%) and a higher number of shots on target (6.5 vs 5.83). Both teams share an equal average xG of 1.72 per match, but the visitors clearly convert their chances more often and dominate after the break — they scored 3 goals in the 46–60 minute window while the hosts concede 1 goal there. On this basis the most likely scenario is that Banga leads at the break (67% season rate), but Kauno Žalgiris produces a turnaround and wins by full-time; therefore 1/2 is the strongest signal, with lower probabilities for a draw or a home win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

27Possession (%)73
BangaKauno Žalgiris
8Shots24
BangaKauno Žalgiris
3Shots on target6
BangaKauno Žalgiris
0.86xG2.34
BangaKauno Žalgiris
4Corners8
BangaKauno Žalgiris
20Dangerous attacks59
BangaKauno Žalgiris
9Fouls14
BangaKauno Žalgiris
4Cards1
BangaKauno Žalgiris

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

BangaKauno Žalgiris
1.2Goals scored / game2.8
BangaKauno Žalgiris
0.7Goals allowed / game0.5
BangaKauno Žalgiris
45%Average possession64%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
3.7Shots on target / game6.1
BangaKauno Žalgiris

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.2Shots per game14.3
BangaKauno Žalgiris
3.7Shots on target6.1
BangaKauno Žalgiris
9.8%Shot conversion19.6%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
45%Possession64%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
1.36xG for1.72
BangaKauno Žalgiris
1.19xG against1.08
BangaKauno Žalgiris

Shooting quality

Banga: BalancedKauno Žalgiris: Dominant
BangaKauno Žalgiris
Accuracy (shots on target)30%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kauno Žalgiris is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Banga · 2 pts / game - Kauno Žalgiris

Banga
LDWDW
Season result split
40% W20% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-4
1.40 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Kauno Žalgiris
DWWLW
Season result split
80% W10% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-1-1
2.50 pts / game · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-0-0
Last 5 away
4-0-0
WWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kauno Žalgiris is 133% better for: goals scored per game.

1.2 goals / game - Banga · 2.8 goals / game - Kauno Žalgiris

Kauno Žalgiris is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.7 goals / game - Banga · 0.5 goals / game - Kauno Žalgiris

Banga scoring profile: more difficult

Banga scores in 50% of games (5 of 10 meczów), while Kauno Žalgiris keeps a clean sheet in 60% (6 of 10 meczów).

Kauno Žalgiris scoring profile: very strong

Kauno Žalgiris scores in 100% of games (10 of 10 meczów), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 meczów).

12Goals scored (season)28
BangaKauno Žalgiris
7Goals conceded (season)5
BangaKauno Žalgiris
1.9Average goals per game3.3
BangaKauno Žalgiris
5Goals scored (last 5)14
BangaKauno Žalgiris
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
BangaKauno Žalgiris

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
40%2 goals70%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
10%3 goals50%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
10%4 goals40%
BangaKauno Žalgiris

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal40%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
0%2 goals10%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
0%3 goals0%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
0%4 goals0%
BangaKauno Žalgiris

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time10%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
20%Scored in both halves60%
BangaKauno Žalgiris

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
60%BTTS - last 540%
BangaKauno Žalgiris

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time90%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
BangaKauno Žalgiris

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time70%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
BangaKauno Žalgiris

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kauno Žalgiris is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Banga · 2 pts / game - Kauno Žalgiris

Banga - half-time state
30% leading60% draw10% trailing
Kauno Žalgiris - half-time state
60% leading20% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)2
BangaKauno Žalgiris
0.6Goals scored (1st half)1.3
BangaKauno Žalgiris
0.1Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
BangaKauno Žalgiris
0.7Average goals (1st half)1.6
BangaKauno Žalgiris
90%Clean sheet before half-time70%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
70%No goal before half-time30%
BangaKauno Žalgiris

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per game (2nd half)2.4
BangaKauno Žalgiris
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
BangaKauno Žalgiris
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
BangaKauno Žalgiris
1.2Average goals (2nd half)1.7
BangaKauno Žalgiris
40%Clean sheet after half-time80%
BangaKauno Žalgiris
60%No goal after half-time10%
BangaKauno Žalgiris

Banga - second-half results

30% W30% R40% P
15
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kauno Žalgiris - second-half results

70% W30% R0% P
20
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Banga - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.00
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.8
Average goals per game0.41.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kauno Žalgiris - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.20
Goals scored / game1.21.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+5+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Banga
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
5
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
4
3
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Kauno Žalgiris
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
8
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
9
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-69%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Banga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Kauno Žalgiris

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
264%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
37%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

BangaLigaKauno Žalgiris
Average goals per game 1.902.40 3.30
Both teams scored 30%40% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%48% 80%
Clean sheets 30%38% 60%
Goal before half-time 40%66% 90%
Goal after half-time 80%70% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.40
Average goals per game
40%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / game
1.06
Away goals / game
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BangaSubstitutionOn: Valdas AntužisOff: Aleksandras Levšinas
  2. BangaSubstitutionOn: Aaron AppiahOff: Ignas Venckus
  3. BangaYellow cardSidas Praleika
  4. BangaRed cardDovydas Norvilas
  5. Kauno ŽalgirisYellow cardValdas Paulauskas
  6. BangaYellow cardAaron-Pamilerin Olugbogi
  7. Kauno ŽalgirisGoalAnton Tolordava

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Donatas ŠimėnasMatches officiated: 8
4.25Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins38%Draws25%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Banga's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses against Kauno Žalgiris. Games average 0.80 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Kauno Žalgiris
1 : 0
Banga
FK Kauno Žalgiris
0 : 0
FK Banga Gargždai
FK Banga Gargždai
0 : 0
FK Kauno Žalgiris
FK Banga Gargždai
0 : 2
FK Kauno Žalgiris
FK Kauno Žalgiris
0 : 1
FK Banga Gargždai

FAQ

What was the result of Banga vs Kauno Žalgiris?

The A Lyga match finished Banga 2:2 Kauno Žalgiris. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Banga and Kauno Žalgiris?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Banga won 1, Kauno Žalgiris won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 0.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Banga vs Kauno Žalgiris?

Banga score 1.20 goals per game on average and Kauno Žalgiris 2.80. The A Lyga average is 2.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Banga's matches and 40% of Kauno Žalgiris's.

What form are Banga and Kauno Žalgiris in?

Over the last 5 games Banga have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kauno Žalgiris 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banga vs Kauno Žalgiris?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.